Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

10 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography Canon IXUS 300HS, Compact F2 with Manual Av & Tv

views
     
eugenechiuu
post Aug 7 2010, 03:02 AM

Gadget/Food Enthusiast
*******
Senior Member
2,909 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: London, United Kingdom or Kota Kinabalu, Sabah


how does this camera compared to Powershot SD3500?
ozak
post Aug 7 2010, 10:04 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
17,021 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


300HS have few feature more than SD3500. But still depend on your shooting style and habit. If you like everything auto, nothing much different.

300HS have less pixel than SD3500. That is good with small camera. Too much pixel is bad for small camera.
TSstimix
post Aug 7 2010, 11:35 AM

Dunno
Group Icon
Moderator
3,542 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong, Selangor



I tested both b4 getting this..For sure Canon much better-lah..You can check my nite shooting on previous page.. biggrin.gif all without tripod. Canon having bigger sensor size compare to TX5/7. But there's few features Sony have but not canon such as swipe panorama & all the weather proof fearures of TX5.. smile.gif

QUOTE(c_calvin @ Aug 7 2010, 02:34 AM)
i know that this camera can take good picture in low lighting condition but most of the review I've read so far tested the camera on a tripod.
Just wondering how's the quality of handheld low light image of this camera? It is comparable to those handheld twilight shots by Sony TX5, TX7 ?
*
ozak
post Aug 7 2010, 12:33 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
17,021 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


Man, I like the fisheye function. thumbup.gif Set to max and take a few shot of myself. My face look like a dog.Ha....
skydrake
post Aug 7 2010, 01:48 PM

XiiX
*****
Senior Member
992 posts

Joined: May 2009


QUOTE(stimix @ Aug 3 2010, 03:32 PM)
175gm abit heavier than few 140-150gm older Ixus & actually IXUS 200IS even heavier at 225gm  biggrin.gif
*
Weight (Body ONLY) 200is >> Approx. 130g (4.59oz.) 300hs>> Approx. 150g (5.29oz.)

i got this info from canon malaysia web tongue.gif
i just weight this on my on hands.. seriously.. 300hs is very heavy, for me i mean
Galaxy Angel
post Aug 7 2010, 08:22 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
584 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur



QUOTE(ozak @ Aug 3 2010, 07:53 PM)
Ok. Brought liao. tongue.gif  Not much color to choose. Only red, white and black. The red is dam plastically. It maybe cause by the shinning surface I guess. I choose the white.

Price camera only - RM1200.
Screen protector - RM20
SDHC 16Gb CL10 - RM159
Camera bag - RM15
Total - RM1394.

Those accessory brought from LYP. Still cheaper than their offer package which throw in 4gb SDHC and a leather bag. The original leather bag is damn ugly. sad.gif  Really not suit to this camera design.

user posted image

user posted image

Don't no my palm big or the camera small. hmm.gif

user posted image
*
Hi Bro Ozak:

May I know which shop (which floor and the shop name) you bought the camera in LYP? I plan to get one as well. rclxms.gif
Can you pls post the camera bag here for us to see? Thanks a lot brother.
ozak
post Aug 8 2010, 12:39 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
17,021 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


Follow stimix recomend. Brought at boeing sg.wang. Don't no which floor liao. There is only 2 boeing shop in there.

The bag is normal small camera bag that sell alot in LYP 2nd floor or 3rd floor. You can't miss it.
TSstimix
post Aug 8 2010, 09:14 AM

Dunno
Group Icon
Moderator
3,542 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong, Selangor



I refer to 210IS worf..Most important is the PQ biggrin.gif & reasonable size not like those prosumers/DSLR...cannot put inside pocket wan biggrin.gif

Anyway my sos kicap from here wor:

Ixus 300HS 175gm inc batteries: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Cano...on_sd4000is.asp
Ixus 210i :225gn inc batteries: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Cano...non_sx210is.asp


QUOTE(skydrake @ Aug 7 2010, 01:48 PM)
Weight (Body ONLY) 200is >> Approx. 130g (4.59oz.) 300hs>> Approx. 150g (5.29oz.)

i got this info from canon malaysia web tongue.gif
i just weight this on my on hands.. seriously.. 300hs is very heavy, for me i mean
*
ozak
post Aug 12 2010, 05:10 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
17,021 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


Some shot morning and night using 300HS.

Using fisheye mode.
user posted image

Using Fooliage.
user posted image

Color Swap
user posted image

Miniauture Mode
user posted image

Close up
user posted image

Macro at night
user posted image

Using nightscene
user posted image

Auto Mode
user posted image
TSstimix
post Aug 12 2010, 08:34 PM

Dunno
Group Icon
Moderator
3,542 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong, Selangor



Haha I was at I-City Y'day!!
ozak
post Aug 12 2010, 09:04 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
17,021 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


Better go there at weekday. I when there last saturday. So crowded. More late more people.
c_calvin
post Aug 14 2010, 03:26 AM

¯\(º_o)/¯
******
Senior Member
1,346 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
Just got this camera yesterday biggrin.gif

Did you guys found out that when using smart auto mode, this camera seems to have the tendency to choose a higher ISO most of the time? blink.gif
In the end i have to switch to shooting mode to choose a lower ISO.
maxilias
post Aug 14 2010, 03:43 AM

VIP
******
Senior Member
1,184 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(Galaxy Angel @ Aug 7 2010, 08:22 PM)
Hi Bro Ozak:

May I know which shop (which floor and the shop name) you bought the camera in LYP? I plan to get one as well.  rclxms.gif
Can you pls post the camera bag here for us to see? Thanks a lot brother.
*
wau..i feel like going back to compact digi cam now!!!...
TSstimix
post Aug 14 2010, 09:18 AM

Dunno
Group Icon
Moderator
3,542 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong, Selangor



I seldom use the smart auto function biggrin.gif Anyway even at higher ISO, this backlite cmos sensor still can capture noise free images up to ISO 1600 smile.gif My only dislike using Auto mode - you can't tweak the colour to vivid. (Well I think)
QUOTE(c_calvin @ Aug 14 2010, 03:26 AM)
Just got this camera yesterday  biggrin.gif

Did you guys found out that when using smart auto mode, this camera seems to have the tendency to choose a higher ISO most of the time?  blink.gif
In the end i have to switch to shooting mode to choose a lower ISO.
*
c_calvin
post Aug 15 2010, 12:25 AM

¯\(º_o)/¯
******
Senior Member
1,346 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
QUOTE(stimix @ Aug 14 2010, 09:18 AM)
I seldom use the smart auto function  biggrin.gif Anyway even at higher ISO, this backlite cmos sensor still can capture noise free images up to ISO 1600 smile.gif  My only dislike using Auto mode - you can't tweak the colour to vivid. (Well I think)
*
yeah i guess that's the good thing bout this camera biggrin.gif
the image at high ISO is still nice compared to my previous camera where images starting from ISO 800 and above is totally unusable sweat.gif
ozak
post Aug 15 2010, 12:57 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
17,021 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


It commbine the backlit cmos and F2.0 to achive the noise free low light. You can see I capture those I-city light with auto mode. Just handheld. No tripod.
-kytz-
post Aug 15 2010, 01:21 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,573 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(ozak @ Aug 15 2010, 12:57 AM)
It commbine the backlit cmos and F2.0 to achive the noise free low light. You can see I capture those I-city light with auto mode. Just handheld. No tripod.
*
Ehh i didn't know using f/2.0 aperture can produce less noise! tongue.gif
ozak
post Aug 15 2010, 09:43 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
17,021 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


QUOTE(-kytz- @ Aug 15 2010, 01:21 AM)
Ehh i didn't know using f/2.0 aperture can produce less noise!  tongue.gif
*
To shot in low light, normally I choose F and speed priority over ISO in manual mode. Either tripod or handheld. Unless I have no choice.

I don't like to shot in high ISO. The noise make the picture look teribble. Mostly I limit it max ISO400.

This is indirectly to produce less noise.
maxilias
post Aug 15 2010, 01:43 PM

VIP
******
Senior Member
1,184 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(-kytz- @ Aug 15 2010, 01:21 AM)
Ehh i didn't know using f/2.0 aperture can produce less noise!  tongue.gif
*
as long ISO is not too high, then wont be so much of noise.
TSstimix
post Aug 15 2010, 09:58 PM

Dunno
Group Icon
Moderator
3,542 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong, Selangor



This is what F2 did this Afternoon..lucky shot:

user posted image
Auto exposure, 1/1,002 sec, f/2, ISO 125

This is how Higher ISO images using F2 (well not really too high haha:
user posted image
Auto exposure, 1/60 sec, f/2, ISO 250


10 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0242sec    0.46    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 10:11 PM