Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography Canon IXUS 300HS, Compact F2 with Manual Av & Tv

views
     
-kytz-
post Aug 15 2010, 01:21 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,573 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(ozak @ Aug 15 2010, 12:57 AM)
It commbine the backlit cmos and F2.0 to achive the noise free low light. You can see I capture those I-city light with auto mode. Just handheld. No tripod.
*
Ehh i didn't know using f/2.0 aperture can produce less noise! tongue.gif
-kytz-
post Aug 15 2010, 10:13 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,573 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(ozak @ Aug 15 2010, 09:43 AM)
To shot in low light, normally I choose F and speed priority over ISO in manual mode. Either tripod or handheld. Unless I have no choice.

I don't like to shot in high ISO. The noise make the picture look teribble. Mostly I limit it max ISO400.  

This is indirectly to produce less noise.
*
ISO400 is pretty much the limit for all of us compact users here nod.gif Be it LX3,S90,G11 or 300HS .

But resizing it to about 800x600 does "reduce" the noise considerably but you pixel peep, it's a whole different story tongue.gif

Oh ya and having a f/2.0 lens does help out with higher shutter speed or lower ISO but doesn't at all produce "real bokeh" due to the puny sensor



This post has been edited by -kytz-: Aug 15 2010, 10:15 PM
-kytz-
post Aug 29 2010, 03:30 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,573 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE
Mostly those camera with super duper spec in a small body won't give good quality picture. The most common example is pixel. With clamping alot of pixel in a compact camera will produce a shit picture. My office have this kind of camera which 10M pixel. The picture look shit and my 6M pixel camera is much much more better.


Well, i'm guessing you were shooting at low light?Most compacts don't fare well at low light situations

And there is more to just MegaPixels which affects Picture Quality.Too many factors to consider such as lens quality,built in processor, sensor type/quality,settings such as aperture,shutter speed,ISO performance,built in Noise reduction which will either balance out the detail:noise ratio or just bluntly go for pure NR(in the case of G11), built in Optical Image Stabilisation(different manufacturers have different terms for this)

So blaming picture quality solely on the amount of Megapixels isn't fair.There are other factors to consider too smile.gif

QUOTE
I would choose wider lens than zoom lens. I can overcome the zoom picture by croping the picture in a software with come with the camera purchase. 10M pixel can crop alot without scarify the quality. Makesure your hand don't shake alot. While wide lens is good for indoor, group people and small space. I can't modify the picturet in software. Accept I walk few feet more behind to take the picture. Wider lens is more common use.


Agree on this.Wide angle lens is very desirable on compacts drool.gif

QUOTE
You zoom to max, but the camera tell you, need open flash and not stable because high F and enable lower down. The picture look shit too. Otherwise use tripod which you're not willing to bring along to holiday. Try check those DSLR lens that can zoom 300-400mm and F1.8 cost how much.


It's like that.Superzooms or compacts with high zoom range will have a significantly higher F value to cover the whole range eh smile.gif

And picture quality/details/sharpness will therefore be compromised through out the focal length because of the huge range there smile.gif

Don't think there are any 300-400mm f/1.8 in the market now.Perhaps i remember a 300mm F2.0 from Sony or Olympus? hmm.gif Would probably cost Rm20K anyway tongue.gif

QUOTE
If you in compact camera, choose the spec is most common use. That you able to shot without the camera tell you can't shot. Otherwise go for DSLR.

Anyway, I suspect some typo in this 1000HS max f3.4 which a bit high. At least f2.7 can give kua?


Sometimes you gotta understand the limitations and compromise of a superzoom.It's technically harder to produce a high zoom range lens with very wide aperture.Even DSLRs don't have those lenses sweat.gif Oh wai, got 300mm f/2 but need to pay Rm20k tongue.gif


Added on August 29, 2010, 3:31 pm@Galaxy Go for the 300HS .Definitely better than the 1000HS nod.gif

This post has been edited by -kytz-: Aug 29 2010, 03:31 PM
-kytz-
post Sep 1 2010, 06:47 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,573 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(claxxion @ Sep 1 2010, 06:01 PM)
I realised that my 300HS tends to have this inconsistent focusing problem. Sometimes when youre in the rush, pictures come out all blurry. Is this due to the f2.0 aperture or am i focusing at the wrong places? hmm.gif
*
Your hands shaky izzit?
-kytz-
post Sep 1 2010, 11:27 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,573 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(k-bkeat @ Sep 1 2010, 11:11 PM)
guys. im a novice here. does this camera has a feature like produce considerately good photo if ur hand shake slightly while taking phot? or taking pictures of moving objects?
*
Getting a blur image is because your camera used a slow shutter speed to compensate for the lack of exposure due to low light.Either this or the camera bumps up the ISO and you'll get noisy images.That's only if you're using fully Auto la

Using a manual PnS like the 300HS enables you to fully take control of the camera's shutter speed, aperture and ISO settings to your desire.You can freeze water drops or take a long exposure of a night scene, produce "bokeh" or stunning landscapes with great depth of field.Everything is within your control!

That's why manual PnS are so desirable nowadays brows.gif

This post has been edited by -kytz-: Sep 1 2010, 11:41 PM
-kytz-
post Sep 9 2010, 02:21 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,573 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(littleprawn @ Sep 7 2010, 11:40 PM)
after reading from page 1-9, i think to buy tis cam dy~ haha~
still considering between ixus 300hs and s95~

wanna take a lot pixs for my Bali, Yogyakarta, and Siem Reap trip ler~
*
Obviously the S95 gets to pawn biggrin.gif

Inappropriate comparison tongue.gif

*runs*
-kytz-
post Sep 10 2010, 11:20 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,573 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(k-bkeat @ Sep 10 2010, 08:10 AM)
i  pressed add attachment n uploaded. but after it finish upload. it nvr appear in my post. or any good website can recommend? like flikr all those.
*
Had this problem numerous of times before.Guess it's due to network time out? tongue.gif

Try imageshack smile.gif And do remember to resize it lol

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0268sec    0.54    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 03:57 PM