QUOTE(TOS @ Aug 31 2023, 05:36 PM)
For those with MoneyOwl accounts:
https://www.moneyowl.com.sg/medias/moneyowl...ss-by-end-2023/
https://links.sgx.com/FileOpen/iFAST%20Corp...t&FileID=771257
I just transferred my money out of FSM SG into MoneyOwl, and now it's returning to iFAST...
MoneyOwl will host a Zoom meeting (joinly, together with iFAST) at 7pm tomorrow. Those with MoneyOwl account can check your email for registration details. The registration link is: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN...A#/registrationhttps://www.moneyowl.com.sg/medias/moneyowl...ss-by-end-2023/
https://links.sgx.com/FileOpen/iFAST%20Corp...t&FileID=771257
I just transferred my money out of FSM SG into MoneyOwl, and now it's returning to iFAST...
Some other useful resources:
Why iFAST? Hear from MoneyOwl’s CEO
MoneyOwl to Wind Down Financial Advisory Business (Includes key timeline and dates to note)
Interesting paragraph from the microsite link above:
QUOTE
Does the compensation model of the company matter? We had thought about this quite a lot, not just for the wind-down, but for the industry and market in general. MoneyOwl believes that commissions do create a conflict of interest. But we have never taken the stance that all commissioned advisers are bad advisers or that all salaried advisers are good advisers. In practice, there are many commissioned advisers who do a good job and truly care for their clients. Being fee-based or fee-only also does not mean that there won’t be other types of conflicts of interests. For example, if the adviser just wants to grow volume of AUM to maximise wrap fees at all costs, this could put the client at risk if growth becomes unsustainable or if clients are pushed to invest even when they should not. From what we see in other countries who have banned commissions, advisers also tended not to be as interested in those who don’t have that much to invest.
This post has been edited by TOS: Sep 3 2023, 01:39 PM
Sep 3 2023, 01:34 PM

Quote
0.0225sec
0.67
6 queries
GZIP Disabled