We comparing our Sony 85mm F/1.4 Carl Zeiss lens with the Sigma 85mm f1.4 le. Not with Zeiss that can be used on Canon which are all MF.
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V41!, The Orange Legion
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V41!, The Orange Legion
|
|
May 31 2010, 10:40 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,844 posts Joined: Nov 2008 From: Damansara Utama |
We comparing our Sony 85mm F/1.4 Carl Zeiss lens with the Sigma 85mm f1.4 le. Not with Zeiss that can be used on Canon which are all MF.
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31 2010, 10:41 AM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
uncle ian aaaa... this one sony thread ma, sure on sony zeiss de lorr..
|
|
|
May 31 2010, 10:41 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,131 posts Joined: Jan 2008 |
True true, but the sigma 85 F1.4 price is quite far off from the CZ 85 F1.4 , its nearly double..
|
|
|
May 31 2010, 10:41 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,982 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
|
|
|
May 31 2010, 10:42 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,053 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Kuching |
every Zeiss mentioned in this thread should be implied as referring to Sony-made Zeiss.... unless stated otherwise.
haha. |
|
|
May 31 2010, 10:45 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
15,856 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Zion |
but sony bodies have built in AF motor right? |
|
|
|
|
|
May 31 2010, 10:46 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
May 31 2010, 10:53 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,468 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Taman Melati, KL |
QUOTE(8tvt @ May 31 2010, 10:46 AM) i already got 55-200.. so 75-300 is ok for me i guess.. big beercan is manufactured by konica minolta , well known , 70210 fixed F4 aperture .changing lens no prob since i'm on casual.. just that what's big beercan has compare to sony? sony do not have similar len compare to beercan This post has been edited by likito: May 31 2010, 10:53 AM |
|
|
May 31 2010, 10:54 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,844 posts Joined: Nov 2008 From: Damansara Utama |
Big beercan is 75-300 f4.5-5.6. Beercan only 70-210 f4.
|
|
|
May 31 2010, 10:55 AM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
the big beercan is the 75-300mm f/4.5-5.6, not a constant aperture
the 70 210 is only a beercan |
|
|
May 31 2010, 10:58 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
i comparing this 2 on the first page..
Minolta 75-300mm F4.5-5.6 (big beercan) = RM1000-1500 Sony 75-300mm F4.5-5.6 = RM450-550 there must be something special to make the price differ.. what's that? |
|
|
May 31 2010, 11:06 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,468 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Taman Melati, KL |
ops , sorry .. really paiseh
|
|
|
May 31 2010, 11:13 AM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
8tvt, i'd say its the build quality, then the sharpness comparison... finally is the KM colors... which is punchier than the sony's
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31 2010, 11:14 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,053 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Kuching |
the question is, whats the zoom for?
|
|
|
May 31 2010, 11:15 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,131 posts Joined: Jan 2008 |
QUOTE(8tvt @ May 31 2010, 10:58 AM) i comparing this 2 on the first page.. It has better minolta colours, or u call that classic colours... and the focusing is faster than the current 75-300...Minolta 75-300mm F4.5-5.6 (big beercan) = RM1000-1500 Sony 75-300mm F4.5-5.6 = RM450-550 there must be something special to make the price differ.. what's that? Well, think about it, the Minolta is like an antique while the sony you could get it off the streets anytime. |
|
|
May 31 2010, 11:16 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,053 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Kuching |
QUOTE(Soony @ May 31 2010, 11:15 AM) It has better minolta colours, or u call that classic colours... and the focusing is faster than the current 75-300... but for casual user i dont think its worth it to pay the extra rm500Well, think about it, the Minolta is like an antique while the sony you could get it off the streets anytime. |
|
|
May 31 2010, 11:19 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
124 posts Joined: Sep 2009 |
|
|
|
May 31 2010, 11:20 AM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
mike, thats why u dont see the demand for the BBC unlike the BC, which its value comes into play in the form of constant aperture, weight and IQ
This post has been edited by lwliam: May 31 2010, 11:20 AM |
|
|
May 31 2010, 11:21 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,053 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Kuching |
|
|
|
May 31 2010, 11:23 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,844 posts Joined: Nov 2008 From: Damansara Utama |
BBC = Big beercan
BC = Beercan |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0188sec
0.47
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 10:24 PM |