Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
133 Pages « < 26 27 28 29 30 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Nokia N8 Thread V1 Its now OFFICIAL, The next revolutionises cameraphones

views
     
stimix
post Apr 29 2010, 11:25 PM

Dunno
Group Icon
Moderator
3,542 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong, Selangor



For what u wanna take dark place wor..Anyway for your curiosity..I have to admit..SE Vivaz having more boises than Pana at very-very low lighting..both also bad but Pana abit better..But using flash, The picture although clearer using Pana..but overexposed wor..I dun like flaghed picture..Yes SE vivaz LED is hopel;ess to me..but I just refused to use any articial lights..haha..Photos taken using any artifiail light are hopeless wna..

QUOTE(cheebc @ Apr 29 2010, 11:20 PM)
well try go to some dark place and take some photos without any light and tell me how your photo looks like?
*
BBXiong
post Apr 29 2010, 11:31 PM

CFX
*******
Senior Member
6,317 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
QUOTE(freakenstein @ Apr 29 2010, 11:24 PM)
It maybe possible thou , Technology is advancing each and everyday and moreover , remember the Nokia CEO or something said that 1 day cameraphones will replace DSLRs (That could be possible too. IMO)
*
eventually, maybe, but not even in this coming 10 years i think

camera now, even DSLR, u cant dump the ISO to a very high value without noise yet...
and phone camera now, due to it's packed camera, obviously could hardly even bump to what a DSLR call low value(800) that can have proper quality...
there are just too many factors on DSLR that cameraphone will not be replacing it in near future
stimix
post Apr 29 2010, 11:33 PM

Dunno
Group Icon
Moderator
3,542 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong, Selangor



Let see.....I dun even dare to say a cam phone better than cheap digicam b4 vivaz..haha..now I'm a believer liao
TSaspire2oo6
post Apr 29 2010, 11:34 PM

Banned
*********
All Stars
35,468 posts

Joined: Oct 2006

There is a difference between a camera phone, DSLR and digital camera.

Phones camera are actually digital zoom means they only enlarge the picture not really go there.

Optical lens really goes nearer to the object. Most phones are still in digital zoom. For point and shoot N8 its a nice phone
BBXiong
post Apr 29 2010, 11:35 PM

CFX
*******
Senior Member
6,317 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
stimix: that camera u tested is low end?? i not really that familiar with camera models...i wonder how it perform against better PnS cams?


Added on April 29, 2010, 11:36 pm
QUOTE(aspire2oo6 @ Apr 29 2010, 11:34 PM)
There is a difference between a camera phone, DSLR and digital camera.

Phones camera are actually digital zoom means they only enlarge the picture not really go there.

Optical lens really goes nearer to the object. Most phones are still in digital zoom. For point and shoot N8 its a nice phone
*
ya....optical zoom for phones also...that long waited but yet to exist feature....

This post has been edited by BBXiong: Apr 29 2010, 11:36 PM
ZeneticX
post Apr 29 2010, 11:40 PM

stars for what
********
All Stars
12,411 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: KL - Cardiff - Subang - Sydney



QUOTE(BBXiong @ Apr 29 2010, 11:35 PM)
ya....optical zoom for phones also...that long waited but yet to exist feature....
*
optical zoom for camera phone possible

http://gizmodo.com/5369970/samsung-amoled-...3x-optical-zoom

but... sweat.gif sweat.gif
BBXiong
post Apr 29 2010, 11:43 PM

CFX
*******
Senior Member
6,317 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
i recall they claim optical zoom also caused quality lost...
and that thing is like a camera with GSM antenna... sweat.gif sweat.gif
TSaspire2oo6
post Apr 29 2010, 11:46 PM

Banned
*********
All Stars
35,468 posts

Joined: Oct 2006

the curious part for me with Nokia N8 is how is the quality of the speaker.
because if u read everywhere dolby only available if u plug it to a system with surround sound system. So what speaker is the phone itself really using? Is it better than Nokia 5800XM or worse hmmmm

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Apr 29 2010, 11:46 PM
cheebc
post Apr 29 2010, 11:47 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
365 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Melaka


QUOTE(BBXiong @ Apr 29 2010, 11:35 PM)
stimix: that camera u tested is low end?? i not really that familiar with camera models...i wonder how it perform against better PnS cams?


Added on April 29, 2010, 11:36 pm

ya....optical zoom for phones also...that long waited but yet to exist feature....
*
u mean this 1? biggrin.gif

user posted image

still, optical zoom got its limitation, especially the thickness...


Added on April 29, 2010, 11:51 pm
QUOTE(aspire2oo6 @ Apr 29 2010, 11:46 PM)
the curious part for me with Nokia N8 is how is the quality of the speaker.
because if u read everywhere dolby only available if u plug it to a system with surround sound system. So what speaker is the phone itself really using? Is it better than Nokia 5800XM or worse hmmmm
*
no i think it support dolby, not its speaker. i mean, u can plug n8 to your home theatre and enjoy it.

This post has been edited by cheebc: Apr 29 2010, 11:51 PM
TSaspire2oo6
post Apr 29 2010, 11:53 PM

Banned
*********
All Stars
35,468 posts

Joined: Oct 2006

QUOTE(cheebc @ Apr 29 2010, 11:47 PM)
u mean this 1?  biggrin.gif

user posted image

still, optical zoom got its limitation, especially the thickness...


Added on April 29, 2010, 11:51 pm

no i think it support dolby, not its speaker. i mean, u can plug n8 to your home theatre and enjoy it.
*
Correct it support only thru HDMI. Den The curious part what speaker is it using? Some ppl confuse thinking the phone speaker is dolby surround keke
ZeneticX
post Apr 29 2010, 11:55 PM

stars for what
********
All Stars
12,411 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: KL - Cardiff - Subang - Sydney



tht thing seriously is a phone camera not camera phone lol,look at the options beside the shutter key

regarding the speaker,nokia speaker so far i think the quality is all bout the same.jz tht the XM series have louder speakers.and yeah dolby oni through home theater system
pojam
post Apr 29 2010, 11:55 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
798 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Subang


Expected price?
BuFung
post Apr 29 2010, 11:55 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
8,407 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


optical zoom of course will coz quality drop too because ur aperature getting small, the light go to ur sensor reduce.. to compensate this u need a longer shuttle time OR a higher sensitivity(ISO)... then there are more complication coming in and reduce the quality of the picture..

of course .. it is not like digital Chop... I dont call it a zoom.. basically it is not a zoom but just a chopping of the photo...


Added on April 29, 2010, 11:59 pmHDMI/DOLBY... that is pointless.... u going to enjoy Dolby Digital surround on a < 4" screen? that is a real joke...

This post has been edited by BuFung: Apr 29 2010, 11:59 PM
stimix
post Apr 30 2010, 12:03 AM

Dunno
Group Icon
Moderator
3,542 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong, Selangor



What do u think if it was RM1400 2 yrs ago.still low end/ It just a rank below LX3 when both camera came out almsot sme time.. biggrin.gif
QUOTE(BBXiong @ Apr 29 2010, 11:35 PM)
stimix: that camera u tested is low end?? i not really that familiar with camera models...i wonder how it perform against better PnS cams?


Added on April 29, 2010, 11:36 pm

ya....optical zoom for phones also...that long waited but yet to exist feature....
*

Added on April 30, 2010, 12:07 amLol..u missed my review between Pana TZ15 7 vivaz earlier..options modes probably lesser but quality wise..just compare those photos takenn,,walao eh...still no want wanna believe although physial proof already shown biggrin.gif
QUOTE(ZeneticX @ Apr 29 2010, 11:55 PM)
tht thing seriously is a phone camera not camera phone lol,look at the options beside the shutter key

regarding the speaker,nokia speaker so far i think the quality is all bout the same.jz tht the XM series have louder speakers.and yeah dolby oni through home theater system
*
This post has been edited by stimix: Apr 30 2010, 12:07 AM
BBXiong
post Apr 30 2010, 12:09 AM

CFX
*******
Senior Member
6,317 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
QUOTE(stimix @ Apr 30 2010, 12:03 AM)
What do u think if it was RM1400 2 yrs ago.still low end/ It just a rank below LX3 when both camera came out almsot sme time.. biggrin.gif

Added on April 30, 2010, 12:07 amLol..u missed my review between Pana TZ15 7 vivaz earlier..options modes probably lesser but quality wise..just compare those photos takenn,,walao eh...still no want wanna believe although physial proof already shown  biggrin.gif
*
in that case i feel like stabbing myself liao...i bought LX-3 last xmas and this phone came out...zzzzz
cheebc
post Apr 30 2010, 12:11 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
365 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Melaka


QUOTE(BuFung @ Apr 29 2010, 11:55 PM)
HDMI/DOLBY... that is pointless.... u going to enjoy Dolby Digital surround on a < 4" screen? that is a real joke...
*
no u dont watch them on n8, but it act as a player, thats what the HDMI connector is for, to plug it on ur system.
stimix
post Apr 30 2010, 12:12 AM

Dunno
Group Icon
Moderator
3,542 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong, Selangor



nahhh I think LX 3 still better...especially in dark area..that's where both Lumix TZ15 & even Vivaz failed haha...Let see N8...Low light Vivaz still produced stunning images but not dark area
ZeneticX
post Apr 30 2010, 12:13 AM

stars for what
********
All Stars
12,411 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: KL - Cardiff - Subang - Sydney



QUOTE(stimix @ Apr 30 2010, 12:03 AM)
Lol..u missed my review between Pana TZ15 7 vivaz earlier..options modes probably lesser but quality wise..just compare those photos takenn,,walao eh...still no want wanna believe although physial proof already shown  biggrin.gif
*
which part of my sentence mention i din believe blink.gif i was oni commenting on tht phone

i hope the music quality through headphone will be good oso.at least comparable with the iphone 3gs.tht's enough to make me buy this phone edi
stimix
post Apr 30 2010, 12:16 AM

Dunno
Group Icon
Moderator
3,542 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong, Selangor



Sound quality of NA Vivaz worst than N5800! haha..if u are looking for sound quality..i think nothing beat Nokia 5800..haha biggrin.gif
QUOTE(ZeneticX @ Apr 30 2010, 12:13 AM)
which part of my sentence mention i din believe  blink.gif i was oni commenting on tht phone

i hope the music quality through headphone will be good oso.at least comparable with the iphone 3gs.tht's enough to make me buy this phone edi
*
ZeneticX
post Apr 30 2010, 12:23 AM

stars for what
********
All Stars
12,411 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: KL - Cardiff - Subang - Sydney



QUOTE(stimix @ Apr 30 2010, 12:16 AM)
Sound quality of NA Vivaz worst than N5800! haha..if u are looking for sound quality..i think nothing beat Nokia 5800..haha  biggrin.gif
*
i compared my 3gs and my friends 5800 sq using the same headset and same eq settings.i prefer my 3gs sound more,not to say the 5800 sounded bad,but its jz not my taste.the X6 sq isn't really good thou compared to those 2

sq is personal preference,unlike photo quality

133 Pages « < 26 27 28 29 30 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0282sec    0.46    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 07:09 AM