Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
133 Pages « < 50 51 52 53 54 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Nokia N8 Thread V1 Its now OFFICIAL, The next revolutionises cameraphones

views
     
silrave
post May 10 2010, 08:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,893 posts

Joined: Jun 2006


QUOTE(Boomeraangkid @ May 10 2010, 04:52 PM)
when is this phone coming out? looks nice. and my 5800 giving me probs now.
*
haha
what problem?

QUOTE(Leo the Lion @ May 10 2010, 05:07 PM)
Then super amoled save how many for battery life?
*
ya lo
wanna know
TSaspire2oo6
post May 10 2010, 10:31 PM

Banned
*********
All Stars
35,468 posts

Joined: Oct 2006

What type of problem i wanna know too ? tongue.gif
nicholasbeh
post May 11 2010, 12:46 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,518 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
super amoled consume more battery than amoled.but colour is better.
Leo the Lion
post May 11 2010, 12:47 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
6,358 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Internet World

let say super amoled save 15% battery life. like that?
nicholasbeh
post May 11 2010, 01:10 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,518 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
i not sure.dun have any specific research result on that.
giovanni
post May 11 2010, 02:13 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,898 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


I think super amoled saves battery juice just as much as amoled (if not more). They are basically the same technology but in super amoled Samsung removes an extra layer (of air presumably) hence the thinner screen with enhanced vividness. Correct me if I am wrong
alfredtwl
post May 11 2010, 08:43 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,013 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
Nokia N8 new 720p video recording
BBXiong
post May 11 2010, 11:34 AM

CFX
*******
Senior Member
6,317 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
QUOTE(giovanni @ May 11 2010, 02:13 AM)
I think super amoled saves battery juice just as much as amoled (if not more). They are basically the same technology but in super amoled Samsung removes an extra layer (of air presumably) hence the thinner screen with enhanced vividness. Correct me if I am wrong
*
nope, not air
AMOLED have very very poor performance under sunlight is because they right now have 3-4 layers of glass/screen on top of it. The panel itself, the touch layer, then the surface layer..something like that..and every layer cases reflection, and reflection often causes the screen to have less brightness/visibility. Super AMOLED, combines the touch layer and the screen panel itself into 1 panel, and due to that, the screen will be able to reduce 1 layer of reflection, which is quite a lot, and they also slightly enhance it to produce greater contrast rate, hence it has greater contrast rate, and better visibility under sunlight
GothFebrio
post May 11 2010, 11:59 AM

too long...did not read
******
Senior Member
1,304 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: Kuala Lumpur


so i guess this phone is a failure then, nokia should hv made N8 wit intel core i7 wit geforce gtx480, full hd super amoled touch screen, wit razer qwerty keyboard, 1000000mah battery and dslr camera.
BBXiong
post May 11 2010, 12:10 PM

CFX
*******
Senior Member
6,317 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
QUOTE(GothFebrio @ May 11 2010, 11:59 AM)
so i guess this phone is a failure then, nokia should hv made N8 wit intel core i7 wit geforce gtx480, full hd super amoled touch screen, wit razer qwerty keyboard, 1000000mah battery and dslr camera.
*
and you should be born 100 years later

and pls try not to make ridiculous statement like that

This post has been edited by BBXiong: May 11 2010, 12:15 PM
GothFebrio
post May 11 2010, 12:20 PM

too long...did not read
******
Senior Member
1,304 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(BBXiong @ May 11 2010, 12:10 PM)
and you should be born 100 years later

and pls try not to make ridiculous statement like that
*
this world is slow la then, i should change to another world.
u are comparing technologies instead of comparing phones. so i give u the technologies.


Added on May 11, 2010, 12:30 pmSamsung Wave S8500
super amoled
1ghz arm cortex a8
bada
5mp camera capable of recording HD
1500mah battery
more expensive than the N8,

i'll choose N8 over this. any other new announced phone?

This post has been edited by GothFebrio: May 11 2010, 12:30 PM
BBXiong
post May 11 2010, 12:34 PM

CFX
*******
Senior Member
6,317 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
err..to be precise, we are comparing phone tech
GothFebrio
post May 11 2010, 12:39 PM

too long...did not read
******
Senior Member
1,304 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(BBXiong @ May 11 2010, 12:34 PM)
err..to be precise, we are comparing phone tech
*
yea, so far which phone using super amoled? care to share here. we can see which is better overall, unless tht phone hv all the latest tech =P.
BBXiong
post May 11 2010, 12:45 PM

CFX
*******
Senior Member
6,317 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
actually super AMOLED is samsung's tech, and so far i recall announced phone of using it are Wave and Galaxy S...
GothFebrio
post May 11 2010, 12:57 PM

too long...did not read
******
Senior Member
1,304 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(BBXiong @ May 11 2010, 12:45 PM)
actually super AMOLED is samsung's tech, and so far i recall announced phone of using it are Wave and Galaxy S...
*
erm..other manufacturer wont get super amoled?
galaxy s is just too expensive....and the camera doesnt hv flash, no hdmi out. erm.


Added on May 11, 2010, 1:04 pmN8 spec is just nice, just hope tht symbian^3 doesnt screw it up.

This post has been edited by GothFebrio: May 11 2010, 01:04 PM
BBXiong
post May 11 2010, 01:05 PM

CFX
*******
Senior Member
6,317 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
actually IMO HDMI out is more like a extra, seldom/not used feature...
the Galaxy S have DLNA, which also can provide streaming on HD contents thru phone..as for flash...that one no cure...

i think others can have, but need to pay some charges to samsung gua...but honestly, i don mind the extra cost with the quality i can get...haha
GothFebrio
post May 11 2010, 01:13 PM

too long...did not read
******
Senior Member
1,304 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(BBXiong @ May 11 2010, 01:05 PM)
actually IMO HDMI out is more like a extra, seldom/not used feature...
the Galaxy S have DLNA, which also can provide streaming on HD contents thru phone..as for flash...that one no cure...

i think others can have, but need to pay some charges to samsung gua...but honestly, i don mind the extra cost with the quality i can get...haha
*
im more to features than the display, i usually view pictures/videos ive taken on my pc/tv.
BBXiong
post May 11 2010, 01:29 PM

CFX
*******
Senior Member
6,317 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
pc is enough for me...tv, not that often also...so the hdmi-out aint exactly useful to me
silrave
post May 11 2010, 01:40 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,893 posts

Joined: Jun 2006


QUOTE(BBXiong @ May 11 2010, 11:34 AM)
nope, not air
AMOLED have very very poor performance under sunlight is because they right now have 3-4 layers of glass/screen on top of it. The panel itself, the touch layer, then the surface layer..something like that..and every layer cases reflection, and reflection often causes the screen to have less brightness/visibility. Super AMOLED, combines the touch layer and the screen panel itself into 1 panel, and due to that, the screen will be able to reduce 1 layer of reflection, which is quite a lot, and they also slightly enhance it to produce greater contrast rate, hence it has greater contrast rate, and better visibility under sunlight
*
hmm is it under sun cant see?
Elanges
post May 11 2010, 01:40 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
706 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


HOW much the phone cost?

133 Pages « < 50 51 52 53 54 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0309sec    0.48    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 09:09 AM