ISO 400
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V39!, The Orange Legion
|
|
 Apr 19 2010, 07:49 PM
|
 
Senior Member
1,631 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong   
|
85mm @ f/1.4
ISO 400 |
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Apr 19 2010, 07:51 PM
|
All Stars
15,856 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Zion 
|
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Apr 19 2010, 07:43 PM) This is why I hate MF lenses especially during events. You are already rushing and pushing for the shot, yet you still need to MF to get the right focus risking your shots. With a good 85mm lens, you should be able to get results like this. ooo...can the lens fit my aplha300?sounds cool..haha...Aperture : f1.6, Shutter Speed : 1/800s ISO: 640  Hmm, comment on the noise or the whole picture itself? No offense but I don't see what you are trying to tell us in the picture. No la, told you guys bang for your buck. It's around RM1800-1900+-. Get this rather than investing on manual lenses risking your shots.  Added on April 19, 2010, 7:49 pm Oops, sorry. Forgot still no A-mount yet. Flash, better grip or lens? Depends on ya need la. Which one do you need the most? p/s: I always lurk around in Photography's forum.  wow..iso 640...i dare not go anything higher than 400..maybe should be more adventurous.. Added on April 19, 2010, 7:55 pm  f5.6 iso 400 1/60 This post has been edited by zstan: Apr 19 2010, 07:55 PM |
|
|
Apr 19 2010, 08:01 PM
|
Senior Member
3,844 posts Joined: Nov 2008 From: Damansara Utama
|
vikingw2k : Hmmmm I dono la. 3rd choice would most likely be extra flash la. Still dont need another flash. So it's either 50mm or VG. Both also got equal lust towards it. ):
|
|
|
Apr 19 2010, 08:01 PM
|
Senior Member
4,784 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: MY
|
QUOTE(Braynumb @ Apr 19 2010, 08:57 AM) Dudeeeeeeee! You're getting better with the lighting! Nice one! SUPER HAWT! thanks bro..lurking here(in photography section) do expose me to new knowledge and techniques QUOTE(albnok @ Apr 19 2010, 10:13 AM) e-jump: Nice! Slightly cooler would do it (usually your skintones are cooler yes?) noted.im still weak with WB control. Im still in AWB mode >_< another one..  http://www.flickr.com/photos/e-jump/453214.../in/photostream actually at full res iso400 already looks grainy.. it looks nice when i downscale em  |
|
|
Apr 19 2010, 08:02 PM
|
 
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 
|
QUOTE(zstan @ Apr 19 2010, 07:51 PM) ooo...can the lens fit my aplha300?sounds cool..haha... Unfortunately Tokina 10-17mm f3.5-4.5 FishEye not released for A-mount. Pray hard it'll come sooner or later. Real good lens. QUOTE(zstan @ Apr 19 2010, 07:51 PM) wow..iso 640...i dare not go anything higher than 400..maybe should be more adventurous.. ISO 640 is still acceptable la. If it's 6400 then it's another case  Another one at ISO 640, Shutter Speed : 1/500s, Aperture : f1.4  p/s: Don't quote the pictures, spoiler them Added on April 19, 2010, 8:03 pm QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ Apr 19 2010, 08:01 PM) vikingw2k : Hmmmm I dono la. 3rd choice would most likely be extra flash la. Still dont need another flash. So it's either 50mm or VG. Both also got equal lust towards it. ): If I were you, I'll take 50mm f1.4 considering you already have an external flash. 50mm f1.4 + body doesn't weigh that much to make it a must for you to have a VG This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Apr 19 2010, 08:03 PM |
|
|
Apr 19 2010, 08:06 PM
|
Senior Member
1,719 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Third rock from the sun
|
QUOTE(zstan @ Apr 19 2010, 07:51 PM) ooo...can the lens fit my aplha300?sounds cool..haha... it's canon 5D ler, how to compare to a300 wow..iso 640...i dare not go anything higher than 400..maybe should be more adventurous.. i wish i could use iso800 too Moo: where to get rm650 f42? used unit? |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 19 2010, 08:07 PM
|
|
Senior Member
3,844 posts Joined: Nov 2008 From: Damansara Utama
|
vikingw2k : But then............... When paired with the Sigma 70-200 f2.8 HSM I need the VG lo. See! Dilemma!
Added on April 19, 2010, 8:08 pmlencent : Yup used unit. Normal price la. Good price for used F42 is Rm600 or less. This post has been edited by Kul | Mo0: Apr 19 2010, 08:08 PM |
|
|
Apr 19 2010, 08:11 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,631 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong
|
A700 @ ISO 1600 still looks ok to me
85mm @ f/1.4 ISO 250, 1/80s  |
|
|
Apr 19 2010, 08:26 PM
|
|
All Stars
15,856 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Zion
|
QUOTE(lencent @ Apr 19 2010, 08:06 PM) it's canon 5D ler, how to compare to a300 wa..5D..totally lose..=(....haha... i wish i could use iso800 too Moo: where to get rm650 f42? used unit? |
|
|
Apr 19 2010, 08:27 PM
|
Senior Member
1,468 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Taman Melati, KL
|
QUOTE(neo_lam @ Apr 19 2010, 06:59 PM) i am telling the truth...anyway the combination is flexible wert...he wanna use tht way then let it be... perhaps he just wanted subject more in focus , dont mind amount of noise  |
|
|
Apr 19 2010, 08:27 PM
|
|
All Stars
15,856 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Zion
|
QUOTE(cjlai @ Apr 19 2010, 08:11 PM) A700 @ ISO 1600 still looks ok to me omg!!! no visible noise!!! AAAAAAAAA!!! 85mm @ f/1.4 ISO 250, 1/80s » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «  |
|
|
Apr 19 2010, 08:35 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,631 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong
|
QUOTE(zstan @ Apr 19 2010, 08:27 PM) omg!!! no visible noise!!! AAAAAAAAA!!! all these ISO 1000 - ISO 1600» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by cjlai: Apr 19 2010, 08:35 PM |
|
|
Apr 19 2010, 08:42 PM
|
|
All Stars
15,856 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Zion
|
QUOTE(cjlai @ Apr 19 2010, 08:35 PM) all these ISO 1000 - ISO 1600 walau ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh........all no noise wannnnnnnnn!!!! » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «  |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 19 2010, 08:47 PM
|
Senior Member
4,053 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Kuching
|
QUOTE(zstan @ Apr 19 2010, 02:53 PM) @mike really? some of my past critics said it was wrong. ohhhhh  |
|
|
Apr 19 2010, 08:47 PM
|
|
Senior Member
3,844 posts Joined: Nov 2008 From: Damansara Utama
|
Does different lenses with the same aperture at the same lighting condition and same settings affect the noise? For example ISO 400, and same settings. Taken with SAL 50mm f1.4, Sigma 50mm f1.4, SAL 35mm f1.4G, SAL 85mm f1.4ZA, Samyang 85mm f1.4. Got difference in noise?
|
|
|
Apr 19 2010, 08:54 PM
|
|
All Stars
15,856 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Zion
|
QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ Apr 19 2010, 08:47 PM) Does different lenses with the same aperture at the same lighting condition and same settings affect the noise? For example ISO 400, and same settings. Taken with SAL 50mm f1.4, Sigma 50mm f1.4, SAL 35mm f1.4G, SAL 85mm f1.4ZA, Samyang 85mm f1.4. Got difference in noise? the lens doesn't affect the noise. more to the sensor size and structure. |
|
|
Apr 19 2010, 08:54 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,631 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong
|
noise is fr the sensor not the lens... i dun think changing lens will affect the noise.... but it will affect the resolution & bokeh
|
|
|
Apr 19 2010, 08:55 PM
|
|
Senior Member
3,844 posts Joined: Nov 2008 From: Damansara Utama
|
Confirmed right? Just wanted to ask out of curiosity la. (:
|
|
|
Apr 19 2010, 09:04 PM
|
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006
|
QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ Apr 19 2010, 08:55 PM) Confirmed right? Just wanted to ask out of curiosity la. (: of coz lenses are not affect the noise.... |
|
|
Apr 19 2010, 09:06 PM
|
|
All Stars
15,856 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Zion
|
QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ Apr 19 2010, 08:55 PM) Confirmed right? Just wanted to ask out of curiosity la. (: yeapz..lens nothing to do with noise.. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0285sec
 0.33
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 11:22 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.