thanks!!
Photography Nikon D40/D40x/D60/D3000/D5000 V8, Entry Level Digital SLR from Nikon.
Photography Nikon D40/D40x/D60/D3000/D5000 V8, Entry Level Digital SLR from Nikon.
|
|
Apr 5 2010, 11:26 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
196 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
thanks!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 5 2010, 11:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,916 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(CloudKee @ Apr 5 2010, 11:10 PM) Hmmm...thanks for you all suggestion! whoa wait wait wait... bad idea there. if u wanna get 70-300, dun get 18-105... no use having duplicate range of 70-105Now I may think to get 18-105.... after that, as you said, aim for 70-300!! if u want 70-300, juz keep with ur 18-55 kit lens. missing 55-70mm not much problem. for ~RM2700 i think better get Tamron 17-50 VC and SB600 flash. but then u'll end up with two lens... i thought u said u only want 1 lens? QUOTE(CloudKee @ Apr 5 2010, 11:20 PM) ur 80-200 can only manual focus, and maximum aperture is f4. 70-200 can autofocus on D3000, and maximum aperture is F2.8 n got VR summore. big big differenceQUOTE(mykpin88 @ Apr 5 2010, 11:24 PM) what body u using? if D40-D5000 then cheapest 50mm is the 50mm AF-S f1.4, RM1800 |
|
|
Apr 5 2010, 11:31 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
196 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
|
|
|
Apr 5 2010, 11:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury |
|
|
|
Apr 5 2010, 11:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,258 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: /k/ |
[quote=mykpin88,Apr 5 2010, 11:31 PM]
what body u using? if D40-D5000 then cheapest 50mm is the 50mm AF-S f1.4, RM1800 [/quote] using D5000 oh.. cheapest rm1800? haha u're good in joking huh? [/quote] He doesn't joking with you... since D5000 dont have build-in motor.. you would have to manual focus with 50mm f1.8 ( Rm3xx ). The 50mm AF-S f1.4 which is rm1800 then can auto-focus with your d5000 body... |
|
|
Apr 5 2010, 11:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,940 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Soviet Sarawak |
just get AFS 35mm f/1.8 , will behave like 50mm on our crop sensor body. (1.5 x 35mm = 52.5mm)
This post has been edited by edministrator: Apr 5 2010, 11:41 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 5 2010, 11:41 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
196 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
[quote=Darkripper,Apr 5 2010, 11:34 PM]
using D5000 oh.. cheapest rm1800? haha u're good in joking huh? [/quote] He doesn't joking with you... since D5000 dont have build-in motor.. you would have to manual focus with 50mm f1.8 ( Rm3xx ). The 50mm AF-S f1.4 which is rm1800 then can auto-focus with your d5000 body... [/quote] Awww so expensive..haha den I manual focus better..have to bear with it.. Added on April 5, 2010, 11:44 pm[quote=edministrator,Apr 5 2010, 11:40 PM] just get AFS 35mm f/1.8 , will behave like 50mm on our crop sensor body. (1.5 x 35mm = 52.5mm) [/quote] How much will it be? This post has been edited by mykpin88: Apr 5 2010, 11:44 PM |
|
|
Apr 5 2010, 11:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,952 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(edministrator @ Apr 5 2010, 11:18 PM) many reviews says D300/D300s + 18-200mm VR is a reporter's/traveller's deadly combo, due to D300s ability to shoot low noise @ hi iso to compensate this slower variable aperture lens I reporter doesn't need that much of a sharp image if they're job r like stalking etc etc. What if you're doing pro modelling or wedding or event specialization? U can't exact a soft image to be used for large prints to begin with no?QUOTE(dvlzplayground @ Apr 5 2010, 11:29 PM) whoa wait wait wait... bad idea there. if u wanna get 70-300, dun get 18-105... no use having duplicate range of 70-105 d90 also within your d40-d5000 le if u want 70-300, juz keep with ur 18-55 kit lens. missing 55-70mm not much problem. for ~RM2700 i think better get Tamron 17-50 VC and SB600 flash. but then u'll end up with two lens... i thought u said u only want 1 lens? ur 80-200 can only manual focus, and maximum aperture is f4. 70-200 can autofocus on D3000, and maximum aperture is F2.8 n got VR summore. big big difference what body u using? if D40-D5000 then cheapest 50mm is the 50mm AF-S f1.4, RM1800 I didn't recommend the 1760 vc because 1750vc is a little short to begin with. That's the darn sad part |
|
|
Apr 5 2010, 11:46 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
226 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
rm780 at j-one meh.. but donno ave stock or not.. yesterday i only saw 35 f2..
|
|
|
Apr 5 2010, 11:49 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,940 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Soviet Sarawak |
QUOTE(SkyBlue99 @ Apr 5 2010, 11:45 PM) I reporter doesn't need that much of a sharp image if they're job r like stalking etc etc. What if you're doing pro modelling or wedding or event specialization? U can't exact a soft image to be used for large prints to begin with no? agree, specific tasks requires specific gears to cater the needs. users needs to understand their shooting style before giving in to their purchasing impulse. |
|
|
Apr 5 2010, 11:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,916 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(mykpin88 @ Apr 5 2010, 11:31 PM) lol i wasnt joking. u got five options:1) 50mm f1.8D, ~RM300-400. cheap, but u need to manual focus. 2) 35mm f1.8G, ~RM750-850. reasonable price, can autofocus, easier to use in small rooms 3) 50mm f1.4D, ~RM1000 i guess. better performance than (1), but still need to manual focus 4) 35mm f2D, ~ ~RM1100. sharper than (2), still can use with FX nikons, but need to manual focus 5) 50mm f1.4G, ~RM1800. holy grail QUOTE(SkyBlue99 @ Apr 5 2010, 11:45 PM) I reporter doesn't need that much of a sharp image if they're job r like stalking etc etc. What if you're doing pro modelling or wedding or event specialization? U can't exact a soft image to be used for large prints to begin with no? i mean d40-d5000 as in the thread's cameras d90 also within your d40-d5000 le I didn't recommend the 1760 vc because 1750vc is a little short to begin with. That's the darn sad part yeah it's short. but if he wants the 70-300, i think better pair with 18-55 or 17-50. single lens solution, ofcoz 18-200, but must decide that he wont buy 70-300 later. if he did, huge duplicate range This post has been edited by dvlzplayground: Apr 5 2010, 11:56 PM |
|
|
Apr 5 2010, 11:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,538 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
QUOTE(CloudKee @ Apr 5 2010, 10:57 PM) just sell all ur lens lah since u are not going to change the lens after u buy the 18-200mm...QUOTE(mykpin88 @ Apr 5 2010, 11:24 PM) there is no cheap 50mm for D5000...xcept u upgrade ur body like D90 then the 50mm 1.8 which cost around 370 can be autofocus... |
|
|
Apr 6 2010, 12:01 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
Cloudkee:the review of D60 is better than D3000 only matters to those deciding to buy between these 2
u oredi have D3000 has no logic to change to D60, jz stick with D3000 jz get 18-200 VRII if your problm is lazy to change lenses, or Sigma 18-200 OS for within your budget but if u plan to get 70-300 VR in future, no point getting it for the extra 200-300mm do u reli nid the range 105-200mm? if not i suggest get 18-105 then buy other lens such as 35mm 1.8G with the remaining budget mykpin88:like wat posted by dvlzplayground, the only option with AF for u is Nikkor 35mm f/1.8G or Nikkor 50mm f/1.4G the other choices r Sigma 30mm f/1.4(rm1.8k) n Sigma 50mm f/1.4(rm2.1k) or the final choice is jz to upgrade to a body with built-in AF motor then get the cheap 50mm f/1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 6 2010, 12:05 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,362 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
QUOTE(edministrator @ Apr 5 2010, 11:40 PM) 50mm f1.4 is totally different from 35/50mm f1.8... itz even sharp at f1.4... i got the chance to play wit 50mm f1.4 n i m falling in love wit it...![]() shot at f1.4 and ISO3200 |
|
|
Apr 6 2010, 12:07 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,730 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
![]() |
|
|
Apr 6 2010, 12:10 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
QUOTE(illegaldragon87 @ Apr 6 2010, 12:05 AM) 50mm f1.4 is totally different from 35/50mm f1.8... itz even sharp at f1.4... i got the chance to play wit 50mm f1.4 n i m falling in love wit it... bro u poisoning ppl with 50mm again!» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « shot at f1.4 and ISO3200 lucky this time i finally got my 50mm, this poison doesnt work on me anymore finally got a 50mm f/1.4? or pinjam 1? Added on April 6, 2010, 12:12 am QUOTE(syafix @ Apr 6 2010, 12:07 AM) a bit plain to me, maybe shud try lower angle so can c background on right side of auntyThis post has been edited by General_Nic: Apr 6 2010, 12:12 AM |
|
|
Apr 6 2010, 12:12 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,362 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
QUOTE(General_Nic @ Apr 6 2010, 12:10 AM) bro u poisoning ppl with 50mm again! i was able to 'own' the 50mm f1.4 for 2 days... mayb gonna say bye bye to 50mm f1.8 and hello to 50mm f1.4 and a fish... lucky this time i finally got my 50mm, this poison doesnt work on me anymore finally got a 50mm f/1.4? or pinjam 1? |
|
|
Apr 6 2010, 12:12 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2010, 12:14 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,362 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2010, 12:14 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
no, a D300s?
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0274sec
0.63
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 12:39 AM |