QUOTE(StarGhazzer @ Feb 10 2010, 12:17 PM)
That Scirocco is pimped out with a grill that's similar to the IROC concept. Production version Scirorcco is more subtle and looks more elegant.
I don't think the K5 will look as fierce as the leaked concept art. It's very likely to have a less muscular body with smaller wheel arches and rims. The Cadenza has a side view that is similar to the F01 7 series, and the K5 is very likely to sport a similar profile as well.
The Schreyer line across the top of the windscreen is a nice addition which emphasises more on the new family look.
There's also the Ray Concept which will be revealed in the near future. Now that's another interesting car which doesn't exactly sport the Schreyer grill.
Anyway, just went to the petrol station this afternoon.
39.6L for the past week, total distance 360L; which equates to an appalling 11L/100km and it's mainly highway driving.
I don't think the 2.0 is that thirsty, but possible reasons for the high FC:
1. We have RON91 here instead of the better quality RON95 available in Malaysia.
2. I've been quite naughty with the accelerator - overtaking at 120km/h frequently and being aggressive with the shift-tronic.
Let's see how the FC is like for next week, where I'll attempt a more gentle approach.
Wah ! 0.198 per km is quite hight fc for the 2.0 on mainly highway driving ...how much for the fc if drive in town ?I don't think the K5 will look as fierce as the leaked concept art. It's very likely to have a less muscular body with smaller wheel arches and rims. The Cadenza has a side view that is similar to the F01 7 series, and the K5 is very likely to sport a similar profile as well.
The Schreyer line across the top of the windscreen is a nice addition which emphasises more on the new family look.
There's also the Ray Concept which will be revealed in the near future. Now that's another interesting car which doesn't exactly sport the Schreyer grill.
Anyway, just went to the petrol station this afternoon.
39.6L for the past week, total distance 360L; which equates to an appalling 11L/100km and it's mainly highway driving.
I don't think the 2.0 is that thirsty, but possible reasons for the high FC:
1. We have RON91 here instead of the better quality RON95 available in Malaysia.
2. I've been quite naughty with the accelerator - overtaking at 120km/h frequently and being aggressive with the shift-tronic.
Let's see how the FC is like for next week, where I'll attempt a more gentle approach.
Feb 10 2010, 02:34 PM

Quote
0.0183sec
0.23
6 queries
GZIP Disabled