QUOTE(dvlzplayground @ Jan 14 2010, 02:09 AM)
nimrod i think u're taking our arguments a little bit too extreme. we dont demand 100 million cases and 5-10 million cases annually. as i said, a small fraction would do, so early adopters still have some choice. obviously no one is going to upgrade just so they have more choices on accessories. and of course manufacturers would concentrate more on current products. all im saying is i dont think it would hurt much for a few choices. if my current ipod touch casing breaks, i won't have anything to replace it
Dude, an he isnt anywhere near extreme? cmon. I'm just putting a basic mathemathical equation, lets say during that 1 year period of june 07 to june 08, on average people change about 5-6 casings, the initial production of 100 million cases or whatever accessories would have justified it, the part i dont get is do the third party manufacturers being third party in the first instance make extra and lose money on a saturated market? think, even the smallest amount of items will shoot the cost up, they have to keep their stamping machine running on older moulds, and if its not mass production it isnt gonna be cheap for manufacturers. If your casing breaks well, just look for surplus cases that some retailers have an auction in ebay, or a sleeve case, the apple sock is something good.
QUOTE(dvlzplayground @ Jan 14 2010, 02:09 AM)
obviously kernkraft wasnt talking about removable covers and batteries or service parts. dont stretch it
right, and this line below doesnt not at all talk about that? and im stretching to far eh? how to compare that line with a phone that dont have removable parts? of course have to talk about service partsla
QUOTE
i can still see 3310's original battery covers, battery itself, screen protectors and what not, in a Nokia service centre, and also in phone shops
QUOTE(dvlzplayground @ Jan 14 2010, 02:09 AM)
and the last part is pure fanboy. if its never about the hardware, all of us are using Apple II right now. and the iphone, admittedly with excellent software, is only possible with its hardware: the capacitive multitouch screen. the iphone might be the best ever phone today, but it's not like it doesnt have any cons at all. to dismiss that is just fanboyism.
Ah dude cmon, calling me a fanboy? on this thread really? even after i said whats the point of talking bout the islate when you dont even know whats its use or whether or not it'll benefit us? and am i the one who says stuff like "i'll be dreaming about it", reality check please. Look read back what i said, form vs function. Even if we were using the latest core i7, would you be running os 9 on it? lets say with all the hardware advancement that apple put into the phone and they installed win mobile on it? would it be the same? without the app store or the developers would it be the runaway success that it is now? of course the iphone has cons, never did i say it was perfect, heck nothing man made is perfect. dont try to add words that were never in my posting, let me quote you what i said and do indicate at which point i made it all godlly without any imperfection?
QUOTE
form versus function? cmon no phone to date can match the iphone OS, its never about the hardware its all about the software, the app store and the support an the ease of use, hell if its about flash or camera i'd get a cheaper phone like SE that has 7MPX but would i get the same experience? no. To date all the three iphones has received similar software updates, can nokia or SE make sure all their line up of smartphone of yesteryears be able to install the latest symbian? no cause its a closed environment
This post has been edited by nimrod323: Jan 14 2010, 05:25 AM