yeap. but RAW size is hugeee
And not to forget, upload your picture in good hosting.

hahah flickr. my house internet got problem uploading flickrr last time. damn slow la....

memang like that one lahh. i rather wait longer to have super awesome pics.
anyone going to Nikon center today?

ok..thanks for the info...
about the raw...hmmm...what u mean by much much sharper??

plain raw st8 convert?? or need edit something??

isnt JPEG theoretically sharper than RAW? since got in-camera sharpening ;p dunno lah

4 me the best advantage of RAW is WB...when adjust WB in PP very accurate, compared to JPEGs. 2nd is exposure. so i only shoot RAW when it's very dark or i cant decide which WB setting looks better hehe

but most of the time JPEG 4 me. save space

If you were to convert from RAW to JPEG using Nikon CaptureNX or ViewNX, the picture control settings will be intact. Thus, all the sharpening, color, d-lighting and etc will be applied.

If you use CaptureNX/ViewNX, sharpening from camera settings would be applied too.

ok..will try it when i got the time...XD

PM me the price for
50mm F1.8
still have warranty?
filter?

yeah..i go today to nikon centre..today show theme is cheong sam..damn,didnt bring an stool to get higher ground..apart from that,my sb600 fail me today..not enough lighting.i think its time for sb-900 to replace the sb-600..anybody else went there??

---

Added on January 9, 2010, 10:28 pmtoday manage to test few lens on my d200 & gf d90 body..10.5 fish eye,105mm f2,12-24 f4 and also the new 70-200mmvrII..demn,the focusing speed is very2 fast compare to my tammy..1 click teros lock seyh...

This post has been edited by zackskate666: Jan 9 2010, 10:28 PM

What is the advantage of doing that?

raw can keep details up to almost 5 stops if i'm not wrong. i read that somewhere before.

what i think he'll do is, shoot it underexposed so that can use a faster shutter, then later only boost exposure from computer.
RAW also allows u to control noise better.

err...what u trying to do here???

5 stops? That can't be right. Perhaps you can provide the link.

probably it wont look as good as if u snapped it at the correct exposure, but the amount of detail retained is a lot more compared to jpeg. very much more dynamic range retained. = more chances of a spoiled shot to be saved.

see this - http://photodoto.com/raw-vs-jpg-correcting...rover-exposure/ 3 stops over n under comparison.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSB2jP7Awbc

i wanna know too.. maybe got VR tech inside RAW shooting.. ehehehhe

er..that youtube make me more confuse...=.= coz the people owaz change the pic and i dont know which is raw and which is jpeg...

Thank you for the link. The youtube video ... very enlightening.

basically the utube vid shows that a lot more details are retained in raw even in the clipped areas.

so from now on shoot raw or jpeg or raw+jpeg better?? i am confuse now
i am lazy type people...

This post has been edited by noobie1: Jan 10 2010, 12:02 AM

if u're not sure den better stay with jpeg. until u're really sure of what is raw, what it can do and what can u do with what it can do, then only snap raw.