Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
5 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Nikon D90 v5

views
     
dvlzplayground
post Dec 8 2009, 01:02 AM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(noobie1 @ Dec 8 2009, 12:14 AM)
was curently thinking my next len

1)50mm 1.4
2)50mm 1.8
3)35mm 1.8

can any sifu here enlighten me??
*
u're using D90 right? u have crop factor of 1.5x. apart from the low/big (i duno how to term this haha) aperture, 50mm lens are famous because they are 'normal', as in what u see with ur own eyes. but the 50mm lens will be a 75mm lens on a D90 (50 * 1.5 = 75). so in order to get the equivalent of a 50mm on a full-frame sensor DSLR, u'll need 50/1.5 = 33.3 ~ 35mm lens. so get (3) smile.gif
dvlzplayground
post Dec 9 2009, 10:59 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(SkyBlue99 @ Dec 9 2009, 09:29 PM)
not sometime.. confirmed.. sarawak price is  doh.gif
*
agree! ;p got one shop selling D60 RM2.4k sad.gif
dvlzplayground
post Dec 16 2009, 01:30 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


do u guys think it's advisable for me to get a D90 (w/o kit lens) and a 50mm f/1.8? cuz my gf already has a D60 with kit lens...and i dont zoom a lot
dvlzplayground
post Dec 16 2009, 02:46 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(lighter @ Dec 16 2009, 02:03 PM)
i would suggest you go for 35mm f/1.8 instead. For me actually 50mm is too tight.

A lot of people saying that 50mm is good lens, yes, but for me actually not that good for DX camera.  hmm.gif
*
actually thinking of the 35mm as well. depends on budget haha. but is it a good idea to forgo the 18-105?
dvlzplayground
post Dec 16 2009, 07:54 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Sp00kY @ Dec 16 2009, 09:22 AM)
first, get ur pic in focused
looking at your pic, you are shooting at 1/60 for both pics....
the first pic at 18mm should be sharp....but it doesnt really look like its sharp though..
2nd pic at 105mm 1/60 should be sufficient with VR on...unless that lady is moving a lot..
try bursting your shots next time and then choose the sharpest one ....else, u might just miss a shot instead because of camera shake..
*
u guys can know shutter speed juz by looking at the photo w/o exif data?
dvlzplayground
post Dec 16 2009, 08:40 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(shinjun @ Dec 16 2009, 07:57 PM)
You can save the photo down and view the EXIF if the information is still with the photo.
*
ooo okay hahaha. i thought u guys so pro until juz by looking at the photo can guess the shutter speed dy tongue.gif

This post has been edited by dvlzplayground: Dec 16 2009, 08:41 PM
dvlzplayground
post Dec 17 2009, 12:55 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(edtan5 @ Dec 17 2009, 12:51 PM)
^D90 looks kinda expensive hmm.gif
*
ya...how come promotion become more expensive ;p
dvlzplayground
post Dec 31 2009, 02:15 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(BaRT @ Dec 31 2009, 01:48 PM)
why..any bad experience? kingston brand quite good what?
*
kingston brand i only trust with RAM... even the flash drives are not as good as sandisk's
dvlzplayground
post Jan 5 2010, 04:59 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(BaRT @ Jan 5 2010, 04:46 PM)
before bought my D90, my original budget is 500D...
after side by side try on hand & comparison..I decided to buy D90, which is 3 months old and until now I never regret!

but just wonder people always advice to buy dslr with built in motor (exp: D90 vs D3000) to avoid high expenses on the lenses at future...

but seems all nikkor lenses are expensive and I don't see where was the D90 can used cheaper lenses..becoz all the lenses are same price rite?
*
for example the cheap n popular 50mm f/1.8D can only be used on d90... for D3000 cheapest prime f/1.8 lens is the 35mm which costs double than the 50mm

i'd go for the d3000 since the lenses i like (35mm, 55-200, 18-105) are all AF-S anyway hehe. for wide angle lenses i think autofocus it not that important, since u'll want to focus everything anyway.
dvlzplayground
post Jan 5 2010, 05:16 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Sp00kY @ Jan 5 2010, 05:09 PM)
there are a few nice and famous lens that u cant use it on a D3000/D5000...
eg:
AF 14mm 2.8D,AF 20mm 2.8D, AF 24mm 2.8D, AF 28mm 1.4D,AF 35mm 2.0D, AF 85mm 1.8D, AF 85mm 1.4D,
AF 105/135mm 2.0D DC, AF 80-200mm 2.8D and the list goes on and on...

the closest alternative that I can think of:
AF-S 35mm 1.8, AF-S 50mm 1.4 AF-S 14-24mm 2.8, AF-S 105mm 2.8, AF-S 85mm 3.5, AF-S 24-70mm 2.8, AF-S 55-200, AF-S 70-300, AF-S 70-200


Added on January 5, 2010, 5:10 pm
mind elaborating and shed some light?
*
for wide angle photo, u'll want everything to be in focus, no bokeh etc. since the point of using wide angle lens is to capture more subjects (e.g. huge group photo) then u'll want to focus to infinity, so there's nothing to autofocus on. same goes to landscapes etc

at least that's what i read lah tongue.gif

edit: lighter described it perfectly

This post has been edited by dvlzplayground: Jan 5 2010, 05:17 PM
dvlzplayground
post Jan 5 2010, 06:21 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(celciuz @ Jan 5 2010, 06:09 PM)
Lovely, now the 70-200 f/2.8 VRII is really poisoning me.. Haha, how about some portrait shots samples?  drool.gif
*
luckily the lens is too expensive 4 me... else i start saving up now haha
dvlzplayground
post Jan 6 2010, 07:00 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(HiroBoroi @ Jan 6 2010, 06:41 PM)
I don't think the mounting of the lens is attached to the plastic shell of the D90.  blink.gif Inside the D90 is a metal endoskeleton (ala Terminator T2). I'm sure the lens mounts is attached to this steel frame. The plastic shell is only the housing. Every critical component like sensor is bolted to the steel frame. So don't worry too much if you attach the 70-200. whistling.gif
*
u made me LOL! among so many things that have steel frame inside, ur example is T2 biggrin.gif
dvlzplayground
post Jan 7 2010, 04:22 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(yuenzhi @ Jan 7 2010, 04:02 PM)
hi guys im having trouble deciding on what body to buy
my option

1.d90 new RM3000

on the other hand

2.used d300 condition 9.9/10 RM3600

may i know if there's a big difference between these 2 models ?
*
i'd go for the D90. D90 pwns the D300 IMO

unless u want that magnesium body lah
dvlzplayground
post Jan 7 2010, 10:06 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


hmm will try to ask my sis to get the black industry disgrace 4 me. i dont want to be a walking nikon advertisement tongue.gif
dvlzplayground
post Jan 9 2010, 12:09 AM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(noobie1 @ Jan 8 2010, 09:55 PM)
is that noise??

btw, the hdr that teach at the front page, izit using lightroom??
i wanna try to learn hdr...but dont know which software to start with...
or izit the 1st page step can apply to all software like photoshop??
*
yes the example is using lightroom to make the 2 (higher and lower exposed) versions of the original photo. then use photoi4gotwhatsthename software to merge

the best way to do HDR is to shoot 3 photos from the camera... 1 in good exposure, one more slightly lower (maybe -1) and another one slightly higher (+1..can experiment lah). this way u get 'authentic' exposures instead of the artificial ones from lightroom. download these 3 onto ur computer (duh tongue.gif)

in photoshop, go to file > automate > merge to HDR. at the "Use" dropdown menu, pick Files. then browse and select the 3 photos juz now. click OK n wallah!
dvlzplayground
post Jan 9 2010, 07:24 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


isnt JPEG theoretically sharper than RAW? since got in-camera sharpening ;p dunno lah

4 me the best advantage of RAW is WB...when adjust WB in PP very accurate, compared to JPEGs. 2nd is exposure. so i only shoot RAW when it's very dark or i cant decide which WB setting looks better hehe

but most of the time JPEG 4 me. save space
dvlzplayground
post Jan 10 2010, 10:05 AM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


eh thx to every1 who reply on my behalf haha. yeah RAW got more information in the shadows, so when in PP we increase the exposure, it still know what's under the shadow, n vice versa

i havent compared jpeg conversion by lightroom vs in-camera though ;p
dvlzplayground
post Jan 10 2010, 09:12 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(alpha_company @ Jan 10 2010, 04:22 PM)
Sp00kY's sky looks fine to me even after the PP..i like it..

but your PP of the kid..did u hdr the kid? it's just too much imo.. a lighter PP would be better in terms of people photos..


Added on January 10, 2010, 4:30 pmmy hdr...look at where the hdr is..hehe.. this is after and before.. D90 + 18-105 VR kit lens
BEFORE :
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

AFTER :
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
HDR done right, good job smile.gif i think this couldve been a nice pic if not for the ugly jungle hehehe

isepunye try to ease off ur saturation n contrast next time... i noticed ur shots always have too much saturation n contrast, n HDR looks overcooked. try to get more natural looks in PP smile.gif

This post has been edited by dvlzplayground: Jan 10 2010, 09:12 PM
dvlzplayground
post Jan 10 2010, 10:18 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(noobie1 @ Jan 10 2010, 09:36 PM)
that the reason
*
funny but true rclxms.gif
dvlzplayground
post Jan 11 2010, 02:29 AM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(alpha_company @ Jan 11 2010, 02:04 AM)
like noobie1 said... that's the reason.. it is popular aomong the masses...but popular doesnt mean that it's good... it's even a lil bit more expensive than other brands with higher specs..WTF!!!..avoid their rams and memory cards..period.

and another thing...16GB but ONLY class 4??? wtf again..you would be better off with a few Transcend/Sandisk 8gb or 4gb CLASS 6... if something happens to my 4gb card..i wont lose EVERYTHING like if i were to use a 16GB card..

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


just for fun
*
kingston is popular mainly because every shop sell them. their RAMs are okay actually, i trust them more than apacer etc, but not as much as corsair, OCZ n the likes. but memory cards and flash drive, stay away ;p

isnt class 4 okay for photos, no? but yeah, better to have 4x 4gb cards

n nice HDR, got that fantasy look i like in HDR photos hehe

5 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0429sec    0.57    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 10:33 AM