you're like just wanna spend money without any reason..

it's all depending on your needs.. which focal length you shoot more or prefer..

rm2k you can get many types of lens.. for wedding you should go for 17-50 f/2.8 instead of 70-300 unless you have additional camera body for telephoto lens..

hmm...y wedding need 70-300??
u gonna snap ur bro from a far distance??
act the lens is depend on ur need, but most likely,17-50 is ok...
and if u feel not wide enough,can go try the 10.5 fish eye...

there ain't lens that ppl suppose to buy...
buying lens are depend on ur need...

example:
u bought a car...and now u got money to upgrade it...let say u feel the car is not fast enough,then u upgrade the engine,still not fast enough? add some turbo,NOS etc....

i only have one body only..so u recommend me for 17-50..but how about my kit lens? need to sell la like this if not later on not used the lens..

---

Added on January 4, 2010, 2:07 amactually im thinking to get that 70-300 since i already got 18-105 so can shot candid ler from far away...some more after wedding can use that lens to shoot far far away pic

This post has been edited by reinforcism: Jan 4 2010, 02:07 AM

seen the vids b4... nice song

If you don't know what to buy, you probably need nothing.

I'd prefer Nikkor 17-55 over Tamron 17-50
Well, that's alot more expensive

anybody wanna' sell their kitlens just PM me..... I bought D90 without lens..poor me..hehehe

Hi guys, add me to the list, Just bought my D90 on Saturday. Body with Sigma 18-250mm 1:3.5-6.3.

welcome to the clubs!

ooh sigma 18-250 HSM OS?

---

Added on January 4, 2010, 9:18 ami would say go for lens with D.

AF-D quoted from:http://www.nikonians.org/nikon/slr-lens.html
"Introduced in 1992. AF Nikon lenses with a CPU that also relays distance information to the camera, most useful for ultra-precise TTL flash. Among the first were the 35-70mm f/2.8D AF and 80-200mm f/2.8D ED AF Nikkor."

This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Jan 4 2010, 09:18 AM

hi guys, do you know where i can get good price for SB-900 in KL? thanks.

that one too expensive..dun have much $$$ to buy lol...

sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 HSM OS?
it is a new lens and I believe that it is in KL adi..
i used the older 17-70 2.8-4.5 before that the best thing about the lens is the sharpness and the MFD (20cm throughout all focal length)

hope this help..

http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/10-best.htm

---

Added on January 4, 2010, 2:21 pmguys..kenot tahan la..
I think wanna sell my 18-105 kit lens & buy new 18-200 vr II...wat da ya think?

This post has been edited by BaRT: Jan 4 2010, 02:21 PM

hi guys...
is there anyway to test or verify whether the VR of the kit lens working or not? Thanks.

I would say no..... long range zoom lens the IQ not as good as short range zoom lens.. i rather suggest you go for nikkor 55-200mm

2 try shot with and without VR. try 1/15 see the image blur... shud haf some different when u zoom in via viewfinder

i do wedding 90% of my photography, and yes wedding does need tele

why VR2? for the zoom lock? both are using VR version 2 also.....
the only reasons that i can think of
1) want longer range
2) want better built
3) want better VR (18-105 running on VR 1)

downside of 18-200
1) price
2) weight
3) size)
4) distortion (normal for zoom lens )

honestly, i find both image quality are pretty decent.....and yes the VR on 18-200 is pretty good, i can shoot 200mm at 1/10 with some practice...ahaha
erh...u shud see ur viewfinder stabilize (like playing as a sniper in games)...else, listen for that VR sound..

will try on this.. dun think i have a steady hand when taking photo..

---

Added on January 4, 2010, 3:47 pmVR got sound 1? will listen carefully for it later after work...

This post has been edited by shadow111: Jan 4 2010, 03:47 PM