QUOTE(dpo_99_sl @ Dec 31 2009, 01:00 PM)
hi guys
I'm getting my brother's D90 body from him
it's still under Nikon warranty till end of April 2010
sc is nearly 10500 (according to Opanda), no dents and never been drop before, but somehow looks a little bit dusty
he did tell me he don't mind selling it to me for few hundred bucks, but I plan to go for 2k
my offer price reasonable?
for a 8 months d90 body,its quite reasonable for a price tag of 2k,actually its damn cheap u know.the shutter counts is only 10k++..thats quite little also..if ur quite worried regarding it,why dont u send it to the nikon service center when u received it from your brother.just normal service.
Added on December 31, 2009, 2:02 pmQUOTE(mafiaboy34 @ Dec 31 2009, 09:22 AM)
bro.... bila plak aku pakai 70-200 f2.8...?? aku ade 18-50 f2.8 sigma EX DC HSM je la... 70-200 tak beli lagi..mane de sen..
normally sigma agak soft at f2.8... most sharp at f4..( sweet spot)
from IQ some people say sigma 70-200 f2.8 better than tammy 70-200 f2.8.. of course cannot beat nikkor 70-200 f2.8 vr2 la..sigma has better built ( but focusing ring/rubber part always peel off), the HSM is fast.. meanwhile, tammy optically good, but always hunt in lowlight..
this is based my current gear la...i use tammy for my tele ( 70-300 DI LD Macro) and Sigma 18-50 f2.8 for my everyday job..
why not consider nikkor 80-200 ?( better IQ , around same price.)
Added on December 31, 2009, 9:23 amfaiz92 ada tammy 70-200 f2.8.. sila tanya die..
Added on December 31, 2009, 9:26 amreview on tammy
http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/tamron...8_c16/page2.aspreview on sigma
http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/sigma_...8_n15/page2.asp i also used 70-200mm tammy..at f2.8,its kinda soft..but at f4,tu paling sharp punye..regarding IQ,i dunno what to say la.but 70-200nikkor paling top notch.tamron tends to ghost hunt during lowlight..u can view some of my picture taken using tammy 70-200 at my flickr..
My FlickrThis post has been edited by zackskate666: Dec 31 2009, 02:02 PM