Haha all I did was bring it out under pouring snow in Manchester in a crumpler dreadful embarrassment(not a proper camera bag). Still... ok I guess. The cam's alive.

we need to test something more extreme...like...let the camera go through -ve degree celcius...coz nikon state the camera work in between 0 till something(i forgot is how much)...

e-ttl on nissin not accurate? hmm..if like that..i buy sb600 la..before this i go to pudu plaza..but cannot find YL camera shop...where the shop located ? ground floor?

errr im sorry .. did my approximately 8 hours of continuous exposure to windchill and below zero degree celcius of temperature fit your definition of "extreme", sir ?
Or does -ve degree mean something else totally ?


I remember it was about minus 6 degree yesterday.

This post has been edited by the_tranny: Dec 30 2009, 07:30 PM

anybody ?

Tokina 11-16 is a good choice.

thanks !! i was confused between 11-16 and 12-24.

u might want to check out sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 @ the nikkor 14-24..

yeah...something like that...then if the camera survive, then we need to test it again by extend the hour or lower temperature...but if u r scare of ur camera spoiled, please dont do so...please let the pro done the job...=)

Only issue I'm afraid is condensation >.< LOL. Hopefully it isn't that cold at Germany when I go there next month...(or rather next year).

14-24 is pricey, but then is an very very wide lens for fullframe .

yeah i agree 14-24 is expensive and its for FX. im going to use it on my d90 so 11-16 seems to be my choice =)

yuenzhi thought you wanna buy my friend's lens 16-85? that's very sharp lens..

1116 F2.8

---

Added on December 31, 2009, 1:16 amcayalah nanny~! salute salute~! once my battery suddenly so fast out la.. it was at night photography. it just happen once n now back to normal sigh...

This post has been edited by Isepunye: Dec 31 2009, 01:16 AM

i know why, you switch on AF light right?

all the time la brader~! helps in auto focusing

use flashlight la, better than light from the camera

isepunye, no more new pictures?

hey D90s.
what do you think about the Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 II lens?
I read it isn't doing a great job though. anyone has it, care to share your thoughts about it?

sigh since i attach flash, i use flash AF light la...

want to see my baby?

---

Added on December 31, 2009, 1:47 amitu u boleh tanya mafiaboys. kalau tak salah dia pakai

This post has been edited by Isepunye: Dec 31 2009, 01:47 AM

i will go for 12-24 for better range...

bro.... bila plak aku pakai 70-200 f2.8...?? aku ade 18-50 f2.8 sigma EX DC HSM je la... 70-200 tak beli lagi..mane de sen..

normally sigma agak soft at f2.8... most sharp at f4..( sweet spot)

from IQ some people say sigma 70-200 f2.8 better than tammy 70-200 f2.8.. of course cannot beat nikkor 70-200 f2.8 vr2 la..sigma has better built ( but focusing ring/rubber part always peel off), the HSM is fast.. meanwhile, tammy optically good, but always hunt in lowlight..

this is based my current gear la...i use tammy for my tele ( 70-300 DI LD Macro) and Sigma 18-50 f2.8 for my everyday job..

why not consider nikkor 80-200 ?( better IQ , around same price.)

---

Added on December 31, 2009, 9:23 amfaiz92 ada tammy 70-200 f2.8.. sila tanya die..

---

Added on December 31, 2009, 9:26 amreview on tammy

http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/tamron...8_c16/page2.asp

review on sigma
http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/sigma_...8_n15/page2.asp

This post has been edited by mafiaboy34: Dec 31 2009, 09:26 AM