Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V34!, The Orange Legion
|
Poadster
|
Nov 27 2009, 08:10 PM
|
|
QUOTE(ieR @ Nov 27 2009, 12:35 AM) actually, is 40-45. most ppl will set at 42.  the flashgun, no need, just lens with glass. flash grow fungus also no problem one. wont affect the photo quality  As i have space in my box, i dump everything in it.... lens, flash, caps, batteries, strap... I asked this before.... but was ignored (  ).... Do you put yr strap (crumpler ka, neoprene ka, etc) in yr drybox or u remove the strap (isnt this damn mahfan)???
|
|
|
|
|
|
spie
|
Nov 27 2009, 08:25 PM
|
|
Any recommendation should i get a flash gun first or 50mm prime lens?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Braynumb
|
Nov 27 2009, 08:29 PM
|
|
QUOTE(spie @ Nov 27 2009, 08:25 PM) Any recommendation should i get a flash gun first or 50mm prime lens? ALWAYS get flash first... it'll be the best investment you'll ever make... Added on November 27, 2009, 8:30 pma question here... what's the link for the web tutorial for a200/300/350/a700 that was in amc.com.my This post has been edited by Braynumb: Nov 27 2009, 08:30 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
hongyew
|
Nov 27 2009, 09:03 PM
|
New Member
|
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «  [ Personally Like this a lot..... ^^ btw... new alpha user here..  come here steal some photo taking skill.... This post has been edited by hongyew: Nov 27 2009, 09:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Braynumb
|
Nov 27 2009, 09:06 PM
|
|
dude... no need to steal... just ask... hehehe WELCOME TO THE ORANGE LEGION!
|
|
|
|
|
|
-milo-
|
Nov 27 2009, 09:15 PM
|
Getting Started

|
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « QUOTE(Killabee88 @ Nov 27 2009, 10:45 AM) so long didnt share pics here. please C&C taken with a200, KM50    aww love no.3 » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « QUOTE(hokc77 @ Nov 27 2009, 06:27 PM) great shots.. QUOTE(Braynumb @ Nov 27 2009, 08:29 PM) ALWAYS get flash first... it'll be the best investment you'll ever make... erm..if for a newbie who likes bokeh..issit still better to get flash 1st b4 a 50mm 1.8? coz i too am saving up for that lens currently..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hinika
|
Nov 27 2009, 09:20 PM
|
|
spam some pics, need some advice and comment » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « QUOTE 1.first try on self portrait with tripod+wireless remote, using AF but would MF better in this case as feel that it doesnt focus well =.=  QUOTE 2.serious distortion on my hand =.=' flash directed but would be too warm or orange-ish?  QUOTE 3.over shallow DOF ? composition ?  QUOTE 4.flash didnt fired =.= i cant capture the building with more details in night, any ideals ? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
freddy manson
|
Nov 27 2009, 09:33 PM
|
|
QUOTE(-milo- @ Nov 27 2009, 09:15 PM) erm..if for a newbie who likes bokeh..issit still better to get flash 1st b4 a 50mm 1.8? coz i too am saving up for that lens currently.. im not sure on how ur going to achieve ur bokeh.. but for me, this is an example of my bokeh.. using SAL1780 ( FYI its the lens kit) only, and wirelessly trogger flash to the piala2 at the back.. got bokeh also... even not as smooth as the bigger aperture so i guest ( for me) that flash is ur best choice.. lens can come later, together with the skills a350; f4.5, 1/4s, iso100  another one is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
jimlim007
|
Nov 27 2009, 09:33 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Hinika @ Nov 27 2009, 09:20 PM) spam some pics, need some advice and comment » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
wow, all very nice
|
|
|
|
|
|
spie
|
Nov 27 2009, 09:55 PM
|
|
Thanks for all the feedback.. Sunpak FZ42X on the way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
porkchop
|
Nov 27 2009, 09:57 PM
|
|
erm...ahchew, need ur help, I duno how to make the bokeh ball's bigger..please help?? » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « add more info: 50mm f2.8 ISO3200(forgot to reset the iso  ) 1/500 This post has been edited by porkchop: Nov 27 2009, 10:30 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
lwliam
|
Nov 27 2009, 10:06 PM
|
Your friendly neighborhood photographer
|
QUOTE(porkchop @ Nov 27 2009, 09:57 PM) erm...ahchew, need ur help, I duno how to make the bokeh ball's bigger..please help?? » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « use bigger aperture, subject and background distance further, camera and subject distance nearer but still wants achew to answer This post has been edited by lwliam: Nov 27 2009, 10:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
-milo-
|
Nov 27 2009, 10:08 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(freddy manson @ Nov 27 2009, 09:33 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « im not sure on how ur going to achieve ur bokeh.. but for me, this is an example of my bokeh.. using SAL1780 ( FYI its the lens kit) only, and wirelessly trogger flash to the piala2 at the back.. got bokeh also... even not as smooth as the bigger aperture so i guest ( for me) that flash is ur best choice.. lens can come later, together with the skills a350; f4.5, 1/4s, iso100  another one is:  oo..icic..i always had the impression that larger aperture would produce a more blur and smooth bokeh..thats y im aiming for the 50mm..maybe i need to reconsider still need more time to play around with my camera to figure out wat i really need..better dun rush n regret later QUOTE(jimlim007 @ Nov 27 2009, 09:33 PM) wow, all very nice  2nd that  Added on November 27, 2009, 10:10 pmQUOTE(lwliam @ Nov 27 2009, 12:14 AM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Image straight out from camera, no PP. only resized by imageshack when uploading - using roughly same method as mentioned above. Ambient light was pretty warm  hei i noe that girl on the right!! This post has been edited by -milo-: Nov 27 2009, 10:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
lwliam
|
Nov 27 2009, 10:16 PM
|
Your friendly neighborhood photographer
|
QUOTE(-milo- @ Nov 27 2009, 10:08 PM) oo..icic..i always had the impression that larger aperture would produce a more blur and smooth bokeh..thats y im aiming for the 50mm..maybe i need to reconsider still need more time to play around with my camera to figure out wat i really need..better dun rush n regret later 2nd that  Added on November 27, 2009, 10:10 pmhei i noe that girl on the right!!  i know her since form 2...
|
|
|
|
|
|
freddy manson
|
Nov 27 2009, 10:16 PM
|
|
QUOTE(-milo- @ Nov 27 2009, 10:08 PM) oo..icic..i always had the impression that larger aperture would produce a more blur and smooth bokeh..thats y im aiming for the 50mm..maybe i need to reconsider still need more time to play around with my camera to figure out wat i really need..better dun rush n regret later yes, bigger aperture = smoother bokeh but be in mind that the bokeh rely on the distance of the source of light, to the camera's lens sensor.. better go for trial and error.. and see how it goes.. and not everything can have bokeh, but flash will surely helps in a lot! This post has been edited by freddy manson: Nov 27 2009, 10:18 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poadster
|
Nov 27 2009, 10:18 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Killabee88 @ Nov 27 2009, 10:45 AM) so long didnt share pics here. please C&C taken with a200, KM50    Love #1, and #3 oso nice compo.....but dont u think the "kiri" sign grabbed all the attention of #2 instead of the model??
|
|
|
|
|
|
porkchop
|
Nov 27 2009, 10:19 PM
|
|
lwilliam, sure ka?? my gf + background(christmas tree) really really jauh already.....notice can see the pokok "triangle" shape there already..
or is it, I need 135 prime only can do ah??
|
|
|
|
|
|
lwliam
|
Nov 27 2009, 10:25 PM
|
Your friendly neighborhood photographer
|
QUOTE(porkchop @ Nov 27 2009, 10:19 PM) lwilliam, sure ka?? my gf + background(christmas tree) really really jauh already.....notice can see the pokok "triangle" shape there already.. or is it, I need 135 prime only can do ah?? 50mm f2.8  and yes, longer focal length gives smoother out of focus area This post has been edited by lwliam: Nov 27 2009, 10:28 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
porkchop
|
Nov 27 2009, 10:29 PM
|
|
hmm..bro lwilliam, ya ya how much distance from ur gf to christmas tree??
|
|
|
|
|
|
lwliam
|
Nov 27 2009, 10:30 PM
|
Your friendly neighborhood photographer
|
QUOTE(porkchop @ Nov 27 2009, 10:29 PM) hmm..bro lwilliam, ya ya how much distance from ur gf to christmas tree?? can just call william, no need add the L in front. me to subject about 1m, subject to b/g about 3-4m
|
|
|
|
|