QUOTE(achew @ Dec 8 2009, 12:37 PM)
edited another shot of my friend's wedding 2 days ago..this was taken in the church..but edited to high-key feel..hope it works..
nice.. i like.. 
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V34!, The Orange Legion
|
|
 Dec 8 2009, 01:01 PM
|
 
Senior Member
3,503 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: ..Whenever i may roam... 
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Dec 8 2009, 01:06 PM
|
Junior Member
315 posts Joined: Jul 2009 
|
QUOTE(achew @ Dec 8 2009, 11:30 AM) but after using it..i think im more towards 135F1.8 + beercan combination now..70200G is a nice lens..i can tahan the weight but it doesnt seem to give me the DoF/bokeh i want...maybe when there is a chance..i should get my hands on 135mm b4 i decide anything =D yeap... dont waste ur money on 70200G... beercan does just fine... also like the 135MM as well.. |
|
|
Dec 8 2009, 01:07 PM
|
Senior Member
3,807 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Masking
|
just text a shop in jb..they quote me 4850rm for 135mm..but no stock..need to order.. =.=
beercan i think i'll put it on hold for the moment.. =p This post has been edited by achew: Dec 8 2009, 01:07 PM |
|
|
Dec 8 2009, 01:10 PM
|
|
Junior Member
315 posts Joined: Jul 2009
|
QUOTE(achew @ Dec 8 2009, 01:07 PM) just text a shop in jb..they quote me 4850rm for 135mm..but no stock..need to order.. =.= either one will do... too many lenses will end up in dry cabinet most of the time... for wedding, best with 24-70Z + 70200G/Beercan or 135Z combo...beercan i think i'll put it on hold for the moment.. =p but beercans are mostly heavily used, some might have scratches/fungus.. its ur luck.. but cheap though... got mine for 640 with shipping from ebay, and its optics are perfect and no fungus... This post has been edited by MemorableStudios: Dec 8 2009, 01:12 PM |
|
|
Dec 8 2009, 01:12 PM
|
|
Senior Member
3,807 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Masking
|
QUOTE(MemorableStudios @ Dec 8 2009, 01:10 PM) either one will do... too many lenses will end up in dry cabinet most of the time... for wedding, best with 24-70Z + 70200G/Beercan or 135Z combo... yea..im planning 2470 + 135.. =Dother than the DoF..i think the bokeh is more pleasing than 70200G as well.. |
|
|
Dec 8 2009, 01:17 PM
|
 
Elite
4,956 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL
|
achew: I prefer the bokeh of the 70-200mm G, it's much more like the beercan's. I guess since you're used to Zeiss lenses and haven't had a proper classic Minolta you wouldn't know why. However for my work I need the F1.8 and lighter weight and size.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 8 2009, 01:23 PM
|
Senior Member
3,844 posts Joined: Nov 2008 From: Damansara Utama
|
achew : come here to test albnok's 135 la. (: And get my beercan. (:
|
|
|
Dec 8 2009, 02:01 PM
|
Senior Member
899 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Klang
|
QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ Dec 8 2009, 01:23 PM) achew : come here to test albnok's 135 la. (: And get my beercan. (: You selling your beercan? |
|
|
Dec 8 2009, 02:10 PM
|
|
Senior Member
3,844 posts Joined: Nov 2008 From: Damansara Utama
|
Yes I am. Just too lazy to create a thread only. (: My copy's optical condition is really nice la. (: No lens hood though.
|
|
|
Dec 8 2009, 02:22 PM
|
Senior Member
5,580 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(Braynumb @ Dec 8 2009, 09:16 AM) Dude... seriously torn between the 70300G and Tammy 70200 f2.8... need the range, but need the low light shooting capability... and seriously wish there's a 70-300 f2.8... to help u choosing, here are pictures from 70300G ..  sure would cost a bomb...  I would get both if someone's willing to sponsor... but then, would agree with sig on that... rather than buy 70300G and Tammy 2.8, better I go for the 70200G... but main reason is to get what I would need with the money I have rite? so... still stuck here between 70300G and Tammy 2.8... borrowing tubik's Tammy 2.8 next week for a wedding... hopefully it works for me...Added on December 8, 2009, 9:22 amAs for the 1680Z vs the 16105, I don't think it's a fair fight... somehow... love my 16105 for the range, but love the IQ of the 1680Z... and that's probably why the 1680Z used to be known as the "Cari Makan" lens in this thread... hehehe... ..#1  #2  #3  #4  #5  no pp at all except resize and watermark ... the pictures seem not too sharp but good because I was accidentally off SSS ..  ..This post has been edited by Seng_Kiat: Dec 8 2009, 02:25 PM |
|
|
Dec 8 2009, 02:43 PM
|
Junior Member
425 posts Joined: May 2008
|
QUOTE(Braynumb @ Dec 8 2009, 09:16 AM) Dude... seriously torn between the 70300G and Tammy 70200 f2.8... need the range, but need the low light shooting capability... and seriously wish there's a 70-300 f2.8... haha.... me and you in the same limbo... sure would cost a bomb... i don't wanna give up the smaller size, lighter weight, focus limiter and 300mm focal of my 70~300 G but I'm shooting more indoor events recently and low light is sadly not it's best features. self poison with Tamron 70~200 at Artistry event.. f2.8, 1/30s, no flash  f2.8, 1/40s, no flash  |
|
|
Dec 8 2009, 02:49 PM
|
|
Senior Member
5,580 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(hokc77 @ Dec 8 2009, 02:43 PM) haha.... me and you in the same limbo... Good pictures bro .. i don't wanna give up the smaller size, lighter weight, focus limiter and 300mm focal of my 70~300 G but I'm shooting more indoor events recently and low light is sadly not it's best features. self poison with Tamron 70~200 at Artistry event.. f2.8, 1/30s, no flash [img]http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2654/3976070327_6050f0febe.jpg[/img f2.8, 1/40s, no flash [img]http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2669/3976070825_f81709be44.jpg[/img  .. what was the ISO? .. |
|
|
Dec 8 2009, 02:54 PM
|
|
Junior Member
425 posts Joined: May 2008
|
ISO 640.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 8 2009, 03:18 PM
|
Elite
7,826 posts Joined: Jan 2003 
|
QUOTE(achew @ Dec 8 2009, 01:12 PM) yea..im planning 2470 + 135.. =D I think best to have all three, 24-70 and 70-200 to have for the range and flexibility and the 135 for creative candid and portraiture shots.other than the DoF..i think the bokeh is more pleasing than 70200G as well.. |
|
|
Dec 8 2009, 03:27 PM
|
|
Junior Member
315 posts Joined: Jul 2009
|
QUOTE(Mavik @ Dec 8 2009, 03:18 PM) I think best to have all three, 24-70 and 70-200 to have for the range and flexibility and the 135 for creative candid and portraiture shots. add in the A900 u can buy a brand new Saga.. |
|
|
Dec 8 2009, 03:30 PM
|
|
Elite
4,956 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL
|
Sweet that is almost exactly Ahmike's lineup! (But he has an A850 instead.)
|
|
|
Dec 8 2009, 03:31 PM
|
Senior Member
1,409 posts Joined: May 2008 From: Somewhere Over There...
|
QUOTE(achew @ Dec 8 2009, 12:37 PM) edited another shot of my friend's wedding 2 days ago..this was taken in the church..but edited to high-key feel..hope it works.. Very NAIS indeed! I like your style! hehehe...» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « QUOTE(hokc77 @ Dec 8 2009, 02:43 PM) haha.... me and you in the same limbo... Wah! all with Tamron 70200? very nais indeed! somehow really wish it could be smaller and lighter... but 70300G is really tempting too... hmm... really wish can have both... but really can't see any point in getting both lenses... now really biased towards the Tamron 70200... just wish they'd make a 70-300 f2.8 version... or Sony making a 70300G f2.8... waaaaaaaaaaa.....i don't wanna give up the smaller size, lighter weight, focus limiter and 300mm focal of my 70~300 G but I'm shooting more indoor events recently and low light is sadly not it's best features. self poison with Tamron 70~200 at Artistry event.. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Added on December 8, 2009, 3:35 pm QUOTE(Mavik @ Dec 8 2009, 03:18 PM) I think best to have all three, 24-70 and 70-200 to have for the range and flexibility and the 135 for creative candid and portraiture shots. always Imagined having a Sigma 12-24, 2470Z, 50 f1.4, 70200G, Tamron SP90 and the 135ZA. now that would really be covering all the lengths... Waaaa... Dreaminggggg... Dreaminggg.....This post has been edited by Braynumb: Dec 8 2009, 03:35 PM |
|
|
Dec 8 2009, 03:45 PM
|
|
Junior Member
425 posts Joined: May 2008
|
QUOTE(Braynumb @ Dec 8 2009, 03:31 PM) Wah! all with Tamron 70200? very nais indeed! somehow really wish it could be smaller and lighter... but 70300G is really tempting too... hmm... really wish can have both... but really can't see any point in getting both lenses... now really biased towards the Tamron 70200... just wish they'd make a 70-300 f2.8 version... or Sony making a 70300G f2.8... waaaaaaaaaaa..... well, during a recent TT, a few us debated on this and the best compromise was getting the Tamron and adding a TC. Shoot indoor, use f2.8. Go Sepang, use the TC. The weight however is  |
|
|
Dec 8 2009, 03:50 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,409 posts Joined: May 2008 From: Somewhere Over There...
|
Ya la... the weight's just the problem... if it wasn't that heavy, wouldn't mind adding the TC... but then... hehehe... btw, hokc, how much and where did you get your kenko extension tube? can AF?
|
|
|
Dec 8 2009, 03:53 PM
|
|
Elite
7,826 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(MemorableStudios @ Dec 8 2009, 03:27 PM) add in the A900 u can buy a brand new Saga.. Or also put a down payment for a BMW 320i |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0332sec
 0.65
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 05:44 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.