Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
125 Pages « < 61 62 63 64 65 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V34!, The Orange Legion

views
     
signither
post Dec 7 2009, 09:40 PM

Certified Mutant
*******
Senior Member
3,557 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Republic of Selayang


135 prime is nice too drool.gif
hafeez71
post Dec 7 2009, 10:04 PM

/// CleaN ISO \\\
****
Senior Member
538 posts

Joined: Sep 2008



QUOTE(signither @ Dec 7 2009, 09:40 PM)
135 prime is nice too drool.gif
*
super nice.. drool.gif
tried bro rafizal punyer dulu...
Seng_Kiat
post Dec 7 2009, 10:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,580 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(hafeez71 @ Dec 7 2009, 08:43 PM)
2 x 70300g in the the house..should i get one also...? ::grinn::
prefer the tammy though..but focussing a bit slow...deep down inside in want a G laugh.gif
*
i was in the same dilemma bro .. but in the end, I choose 70300G .. my reason was because I will be using it for outdoor events .. plus its sharpness and color are unbeatable .. bokeh too .. biggrin.gif ..
noprob
post Dec 7 2009, 10:07 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,982 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(Seng_Kiat @ Dec 7 2009, 10:05 PM)
i was in the same dilemma bro .. but in the end, I choose 70300G .. my reason was because I will be using it for outdoor events .. plus its sharpness and color are unbeatable .. bokeh too .. biggrin.gif ..
*
Seng_Kiat seems deeply in love w 70300G edi ... hehe
Btw 135mm on apc is it good ?
hafeez71
post Dec 7 2009, 10:10 PM

/// CleaN ISO \\\
****
Senior Member
538 posts

Joined: Sep 2008



QUOTE(Seng_Kiat @ Dec 7 2009, 10:05 PM)
i was in the same dilemma bro .. but in the end, I choose 70300G .. my reason was because I will be using it for outdoor events .. plus its sharpness and color are unbeatable .. bokeh too .. biggrin.gif ..
*
that's the thing, i know how the G perform in outdoor event..it is super duper marvellous, the tammy has the f2.8, bit the focussing..very potong stim one., of course in low light in mamak stall..the tammy is the winner if compared to black G
Kul | Mo0
post Dec 7 2009, 10:24 PM

Cow's Zeiss
*******
Senior Member
3,844 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: Damansara Utama


135mm on apsc memang la good. But for me the distance is not comfortable at all. LOL.
signither
post Dec 7 2009, 10:29 PM

Certified Mutant
*******
Senior Member
3,557 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Republic of Selayang


for aps-c, should get 85mm instead drool.gif
enji
post Dec 7 2009, 10:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
127 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
QUOTE(cjlai @ Dec 7 2009, 06:28 PM)
how much is the A500 now?
*
Bought it with RM 3399, with lotsa freebies!

Oh ya, time to change my signature, I have just stepped into the Orange Region!

This post has been edited by enji: Dec 7 2009, 10:52 PM
signither
post Dec 7 2009, 10:53 PM

Certified Mutant
*******
Senior Member
3,557 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Republic of Selayang


it's Orange Legion brows.gif
freddy manson
post Dec 7 2009, 10:53 PM

ðñê hêll ð£ å gµ¥
*******
Senior Member
4,858 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Tawau, Sabah



QUOTE(enji @ Dec 7 2009, 10:48 PM)
Bought it with RM 3399, with lotsa freebies!

Oh ya, time to change my signature, I have just stepped into the Orange Region!
*
hey dude welcome to the Orange Legion!

what's in the package?
kevinwcw
post Dec 7 2009, 10:54 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: KL Sri Petaling



1680z vs 16105 anyone?
Kul | Mo0
post Dec 7 2009, 10:59 PM

Cow's Zeiss
*******
Senior Member
3,844 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: Damansara Utama


CZ1680 la of course. LOL.
kevinwcw
post Dec 7 2009, 11:01 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: KL Sri Petaling



some review said almost same sharpness and quality...juz 16105 bring more distance and 1680z focus ring more easy to control
freddy manson
post Dec 7 2009, 11:01 PM

ðñê hêll ð£ å gµ¥
*******
Senior Member
4,858 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Tawau, Sabah



QUOTE(kevinwcw @ Dec 7 2009, 10:54 PM)
1680z vs 16105 anyone?
*
some of thiese articles are related:
- http://alphanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=13111
- http://alphanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=12872

cheers! icon_rolleyes.gif
enji
post Dec 7 2009, 11:04 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
127 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
QUOTE(freddy manson @ Dec 7 2009, 10:53 PM)
hey dude welcome to the Orange Legion!

what's in the package?
*
aik...sorry, I've changed my Signature again..kakakak

well, double lenses as u know, with 2 bags, 1 foldable box, water bottle, cap, tripod.

But have to pay to get 2 chap-pa-lang filters --'

Not sure if it worth, but I dowan to think so much, it's my BabY now!!~~ rclxm9.gif
achew
post Dec 7 2009, 11:05 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


allow me to spam a few shots from my friend wedding =)

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

c&c r welcomed ^^
kevinwcw
post Dec 7 2009, 11:06 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: KL Sri Petaling



lol...can see tat many ppl struggle between 16105 with tammy 1750...not many ppl look at 16-105 with 1680z
ahtsong
post Dec 7 2009, 11:11 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,106 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
achew: allow me to say something on ur pic...did u pp alot? it seems not natural to my eye
lwliam
post Dec 7 2009, 11:12 PM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


the 1680 has got extra anti glare coatings compared to 16105, there's where the extra money goes to
Kul | Mo0
post Dec 7 2009, 11:13 PM

Cow's Zeiss
*******
Senior Member
3,844 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: Damansara Utama


And the aperture is much better too. (:

125 Pages « < 61 62 63 64 65 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0280sec    0.42    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 05:02 PM