QUOTE(ieR @ Nov 3 2009, 10:15 PM)
i second that... Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V33!, The Orange Legion
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V33!, The Orange Legion
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 10:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
538 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 10:23 PM
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
QUOTE(littleway @ Nov 3 2009, 09:59 PM) I was considering the same question... My Tamron hunts terribly in low light condition and the picture is very soft. Hence it doesn't give me any advantage of shooting at F/2.8 in low light. However it is sharp in well lighted situation. On the other hand, SAL16105 has a better range compared to Tamron 17-50. Really hard to justify the worthiness of selling the Tamron in order to get SAL16105. 1. A300 and brothers, doesnt has a AF illuminator, they use the pop up as AF assist.2. attach ur flash, to use the build in AF illuminator. your tamron Will Not Hunt Anymore. 3. F2.8 advantage is not before shutter release, the advantage is During shuttle release. meaning, with 16105, F5.6, shooting the same subject with natural light, gives u 1/5ss, while the F2.8 give u a decent 1/25ss which prompt to less motionblur. F2.8 is like bumping iso to 1600 on F5.6 with less noise. 4. tammy 1750, well, Practically, its for indoor use. not outdoor with wide ground. even i rate 55200 is better then 16-105 for outdoor street shooting. (my opinion, but many prefer 16105) |
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 10:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,633 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: www.kelvinchiew.com |
well if not then go straight for
1680CZ only....i have not really seen how good a CZ is..............time to go test test |
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 10:34 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
101 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
QUOTE(porkchop @ Nov 3 2009, 10:26 PM) well if not then go straight for i just got my cz1680 and im really please with the result... is so much sharper compare to my previous kit lens and also the minolta 28-85...1680CZ only....i have not really seen how good a CZ is..............time to go test test |
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 10:39 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
QUOTE(ieR @ Nov 3 2009, 10:23 PM) 1. A300 and brothers, doesnt has a AF illuminator, they use the pop up as AF assist. the advantage of having a brighter aperture does help before shutter release la..it helps in AF...2. attach ur flash, to use the build in AF illuminator. your tamron Will Not Hunt Anymore. 3. F2.8 advantage is not before shutter release, the advantage is During shuttle release. meaning, with 16105, F5.6, shooting the same subject with natural light, gives u 1/5ss, while the F2.8 give u a decent 1/25ss which prompt to less motionblur. F2.8 is like bumping iso to 1600 on F5.6 with less noise. 4. tammy 1750, well, Practically, its for indoor use. not outdoor with wide ground. even i rate 55200 is better then 16-105 for outdoor street shooting. (my opinion, but many prefer 16105) f/2.8 focuses faster than f/3.5 ....because it allows more light if im not mistaken, ur lens will open at its max aperture (brightest, f/2.8 for 1750 and /f/3.5 for 16105) before the shutter... correct me if im wrong.... This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Nov 3 2009, 10:44 PM |
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 10:52 PM
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
QUOTE(Sp00kY @ Nov 3 2009, 10:39 PM) the advantage of having a brighter aperture does help before shutter release la..it helps in AF... u are kinda wrong and right at the same time, i am assuming as, not everyone is using A700 with F2.8 AF sensor. if u are A700, yes it helps the focusing more accurate, not faster, not improve in hunt*(hunt as it will still miss under low light + AF illuminator OFF) but A700 Have AF illuminator for AF assist, thus, well, A700 is like having the right key for night shooting, AF assist +F2.8 sensor.f/2.8 focuses faster than f/3.5 ....because it allows more light if im not mistaken, ur lens will open at its max aperture (brightest, f/2.8 for 1750 and /f/3.5 for 16105) before the shutter... correct me if im wrong.... well, u try this, take ur 1870 kit lens, wide, set to 3.5 and shuttle release, and pls watch as they turn the apperture down to F3.5 to snap, yes, turn down. meaning at normal, ur apperture is not at 3.5, it wwwiiiiddeerrrrr assuming not everyone owns A700, and use A300 as key model, and shooting in natural light (no flash, no external flash attach.) like i say, not before shutter release. it does not help at all in AF. what i mean during is that, it is resposible for the shutter speed gain VS F5.6. the one that give the AI decision to release the at what shuttle speed.. shutter speed gain is a major difference. test 16105, at 50mm F5.6 shoot subject 10 meter away, Vs test 1750, at 50mm F2.8 shoot subject 10 meter away... those who owns tammy would really really know the answer and differences. and even better is, when, very very very malang, ur flash battery dead. F2.8 iso 800/1600 on A300 still can let u continue ur wedding/event job compare to a F5.6 This post has been edited by ieR: Nov 3 2009, 10:57 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 10:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
21,332 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
read this article.... which pretty explains how Autofocus can benefit from f/2.8 lenses
http://community.the-digital-picture.com/forums/t/2012.aspx |
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 11:00 PM
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
ronnie, does that apply to sony AF sensor?
*edit: if u say, F2.8 and compare to a AF illuminator? i'd say the illuminator helps more. btw, the A550 has much improved sensor, it can AF better in darker area vs A300 (as both are without AF illuminator) This post has been edited by ieR: Nov 3 2009, 11:07 PM |
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 11:02 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
244 posts Joined: Jul 2008 |
|
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 11:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
21,332 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(ieR @ Nov 3 2009, 11:00 PM) the discussion is on Canon... but theory wise it explains the concept of F2.8 AF sensorsQUOTE No. Let me illustrate. Imagine you're in a dark room with no windows. There is only a two-inch pipe that you can peer through to see a tiny circle of the outside world. Now, hold a cardboard tube up to your eye and look through the pipe. You can still only see a tiny bit of the outside world. If the two-inch pipe was replaced with a much bigger pipe, say, one foot in diameter, you would have a much bigger view. But if you are still holding the cardboard tube up to your eye, it wont help. You have to get a bigger pipe *and* a bigger cardboard tube in order to see anything more. The lens is the pipe and the tube is the autofocus sensor. Canon cameras only have two types of autofocus sensors: f/5.6 (small cardboard tube) and f/2.8 (large cardboard tube). If your lens is f/4, then your pipe is bigger than your cardboard tube. If your lens is f/2.8, then you can finally switch up to the larger cardboard tube. But f/2 and f/1.4 do not help because you are limited by the cardboard tube, not the pipe. The way autofocus works is that the AF sensor only sees light from one tiny part of the lens, illustrated by the small circles in the diagram below: ![]() |
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 11:12 PM
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
yea, but, each sony model has diff set of sensor design. A700 has F2.8+AF illuminator. A300 has so called F5.6 sensor + pop up as AF assist, and when u popup for assist, it will sure fire when u release. and many discussion over and over, A300 doesnt not benefit from F2.8
This post has been edited by ieR: Nov 3 2009, 11:17 PM |
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 11:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
919 posts Joined: Aug 2007 |
From the explanation above, it mention that Special AF system become active when using 2.8 or faster lens but do our a2xx-a3xx have that? I can't see af faster by much from 50 1.8 compare to kit lens.
Anyone here using Phottix BG+battery? How is it? Thinking to get it because it is much cheaper compare to Sony one but I scare to spoil my camera pulak |
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 11:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
21,332 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
Which models have F2.8 sensors ?
Which models have F5.6 sensors ? |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 11:17 PM
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
dear ronnie, only A700, 850 and 900 has the dedicated F2.8 sensor
|
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 11:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
21,332 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
A700 will focus faster than A200 with the same lens with f/2.8
Is the above true? |
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 11:30 PM
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
QUOTE(ronnie @ Nov 3 2009, 11:24 PM) A700+850+900 will focus TRUEIs the above true? hehehehe, even 550 doesnt have the F2.8 sensor, but with the new design of AF system, they are on par with A700 at night time, but still wont be as accurate as a dedecate F2.8 sensor Faster, is lens depending, how long the focus screw, build in SAM or SSM or manual (manual is u never get to focus on ur subject.... it's due to F2.8 as we know, the DOF is shallow, thus, accuracy is another issue VS able to hunt or not. on A200/300, it may able to hunt at F2.8, tit teett... but,... the next question is, is it accurate? those with A200/300 with 1750 F2.8, will sure tell, 50% accurate, 50% not accurate. but try attack ur flash gun F42 and F58, with built in AF illuminator, the accuracy increase slighty, or much better. Added on November 3, 2009, 11:48 pm ![]() Added on November 3, 2009, 11:50 pmand worst part is, the main mirror only allows like 30% of light through only, so imagine u shoot at low light, how suffering is the sensor trying to get a decent focus? This post has been edited by ieR: Nov 3 2009, 11:50 PM |
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 11:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
this is what i understand :
"A faster lens (wider max aperture) allows more light into the camera and gives the AF system more light to work with, so a faster lens will allow better AF performance when light levels get low enough to start effecting the AF speed" quoted from someone:) Added on November 3, 2009, 11:59 pman f2.8 lens allows twice the light as an f4, and an f4 allows twice that of an f5.6 This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Nov 3 2009, 11:59 PM |
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 12:05 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,955 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Perth Oz |
QUOTE(ieR @ Nov 3 2009, 11:30 PM) TRUE hehehehe, even 550 doesnt have the F2.8 sensor, but with the new design of AF system, they are on par with A700 at night time, but still wont be as accurate as a dedecate F2.8 sensor Faster, is lens depending, how long the focus screw, build in SAM or SSM or manual (manual is u never get to focus on ur subject.... it's due to F2.8 as we know, the DOF is shallow, thus, accuracy is another issue VS able to hunt or not. on A200/300, it may able to hunt at F2.8, tit teett... but,... the next question is, is it accurate? those with A200/300 with 1750 F2.8, will sure tell, 50% accurate, 50% not accurate. but try attack ur flash gun F42 and F58, with built in AF illuminator, the accuracy increase slighty, or much better. Added on November 3, 2009, 11:48 pm ![]() Added on November 3, 2009, 11:50 pmand worst part is, the main mirror only allows like 30% of light through only, so imagine u shoot at low light, how suffering is the sensor trying to get a decent focus? Yea..by using Flash AF illuminator..u wont have problem focusing. sp00ky..i believe kysham said tht before. This post has been edited by AlphaBeta: Nov 4 2009, 12:05 AM |
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 12:06 AM
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
Attachhhhhhhhh LOL hahahaahahahahahaha
Added on November 4, 2009, 12:07 amalso the reason why we keep insisting anyone who is thinking about getting 3rd party flash, Get F42 or F58, they have better AI, WL flash, AF Illuminator. This post has been edited by ieR: Nov 4 2009, 12:07 AM |
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 12:13 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,955 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Perth Oz |
ieR, have ur 1750 ever hunted in lowlight although f58 is attacked?
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0287sec
0.86
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 11:15 AM |