QUOTE(lwliam @ Nov 4 2009, 12:33 AM)
a-mount means? and was it 1.4 or 1.8?Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V33!, The Orange Legion
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V33!, The Orange Legion
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 12:34 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,053 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Kuching |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 12:34 AM
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
albnok one is minolta 50mm F1.4, not tamron kakakakaa
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 12:34 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,844 posts Joined: Nov 2008 From: Damansara Utama |
Sorry supposed to type BY not MY. HAHA. Albert's 135. (:
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 12:34 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,503 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: ..Whenever i may roam... |
currently, only minolta, sigma & sony got 50mm prime
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 12:34 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,070 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Damansara |
just got back from TT....demm poisonous la wey...demmit....!!!
QUOTE(gacktleong @ Nov 3 2009, 09:29 PM) yup...thats the beauty....QUOTE(littleway @ Nov 3 2009, 09:59 PM) I was considering the same question... My Tamron hunts terribly in low light condition and the picture is very soft. Hence it doesn't give me any advantage of shooting at F/2.8 in low light. However it is sharp in well lighted situation. On the other hand, SAL16105 has a better range compared to Tamron 17-50. Really hard to justify the worthiness of selling the Tamron in order to get SAL16105. i like tammy....MFD just dem kinky woo....as albert said just now,"u dont need to frame properly,it can produce nice angle pix". |
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 12:35 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
357 posts Joined: May 2006 From: PJ/KL |
no la .. albnok brought the 135mm cz.. power i tell u..
nvm got fast response =P This post has been edited by lildaredevil906: Nov 4 2009, 12:36 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 12:36 AM
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
for those who thinks A200/300 focusing system is terrible, or tamron so called 3rd party lens, and lenses that make ur machine works below par performance.
and u arent me, so u wont know how i feel. my camera have backfocus problem since DAY 1, send to sony centre twice, they DID NOTHING.... nothing i focus ever is in focus. but due to practise, i manage to use my head/mind and body to compasate it, by adjusting my body everytime i shoot, to get accurate focus. maybe because, u guys been playing with good accurate machine this while, thus u may had set the "margin" of performance at a little higher, thus a small misfocus or problem, u think ur camera is not up to it. for me, i brought a faulty body. sony didnt fix it for me. so i live with a terrible result, thus i created a low performance 'margin' so everytime i shoot something resulting sharp and nice, i am very happy and think that the camera is doing it's best. 2 week ago, thanks to CLIVENGU who guide me to open up my camera and tweak/calibrate it. now everything i shoot is accurate, even without flash attach for its illuminator. this is a miracle, the machine perform wayyyyyy better then expected. wayyy pass my old 'margin' now my camera felt like a new A310, replacement for my A300 with more accurate focus!. "cover my eye to shoot also sharp like needles." |
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 12:36 AM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 12:38 AM
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
QUOTE(lildaredevil906 @ Nov 4 2009, 12:35 AM) no la .. albnok brought the 135mm cz.. power i tell u.. minolta F1.4 mike: albnoks is a minolta 50mm 1.7 i think nvm got fast response =P This post has been edited by ieR: Nov 4 2009, 12:40 AM |
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 12:38 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,053 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Kuching |
ok cool. thanks for the clarification..
lol.. everyone was using a300,a700,a900.... This post has been edited by Mikeshashimi: Nov 4 2009, 12:39 AM |
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 12:39 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,070 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Damansara |
that side talking about IT already...we still poisoning ourself....
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 12:39 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
357 posts Joined: May 2006 From: PJ/KL |
QUOTE(ieR @ Nov 4 2009, 12:36 AM) for those who thinks A200/300 focusing system is terrible, or tamron so called 3rd party lens, and lenses that make ur machine works below par performance. LOL.. ya clive was telling us.. eh.. have fun with ur new calibrated toy =Pand u arent me, so u wont know how i feel. my camera have backfocus problem since DAY 1, send to sony centre twice, they DID NOTHING.... nothing i focus ever is in focus. but due to practise, i manage to use my head/mind and body to compasate it, by adjusting my body everytime i shoot, to get accurate focus. maybe because, u guys been playing with good accurate machine this while, thus u may had set the "margin" of performance at a little higher, thus a small misfocus or problem, u think ur camera is not up to it. for me, i brought a faulty body. sony didnt fix it for me. so i live with a terrible result, thus i created a low performance 'margin' so everytime i shoot something resulting sharp and nice, i am very happy and think that the camera is doing it's best. 2 week ago, thanks to CLIVENGU who guide me to open up my camera and tweak/calibrate it. now everything i shoot is accurate, even without flash attach for its illuminator. this is a miracle, the machine perform wayyyyyy better then expected. wayyy pass my old 'margin' now my camera felt like a new A310, replacement for my A300 with more accurate focus!. "cover my eye to shoot also sharp like needles." what u said kinda made me curious.. attaching flash to use the iluminator? do u get sharp results? |
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 12:39 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,503 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: ..Whenever i may roam... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 12:39 AM
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
mikeshashimi: i bet u felt intimated by A700 and 900... last time i joined the TT, i'm like, hide my camera in my bag only....
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 12:39 AM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
see, now i poison until will soon hilang RM$$$ in the next 24 hours or less
This post has been edited by lwliam: Nov 4 2009, 12:40 AM |
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 12:40 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,053 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Kuching |
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 12:40 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,070 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Damansara |
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 12:41 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,053 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Kuching |
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 12:41 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,070 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Damansara |
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 12:41 AM
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
QUOTE(lildaredevil906 @ Nov 4 2009, 12:39 AM) LOL.. ya clive was telling us.. eh.. have fun with ur new calibrated toy =P i wont say sharp, because sharpness depends on DOF... u wan sharp, F8... hahahahawhat u said kinda made me curious.. attaching flash to use the iluminator? do u get sharp results? but i think the answer to ur question is, "it's more accurate". |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0279sec
0.79
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 10:26 PM |