Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
125 Pages « < 42 43 44 45 46 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V33!, The Orange Legion

views
     
Mikeshashimi
post Nov 4 2009, 12:34 AM

10 Years on LYN
*******
Senior Member
4,053 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: Kuching


QUOTE(lwliam @ Nov 4 2009, 12:33 AM)
oooo, that one.. its an old lens... A-mount
*
a-mount means? and was it 1.4 or 1.8?
ieR
post Nov 4 2009, 12:34 AM

~Cursed Member~
Group Icon
Elite
3,928 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak
albnok one is minolta 50mm F1.4, not tamron kakakakaa
Kul | Mo0
post Nov 4 2009, 12:34 AM

Cow's Zeiss
*******
Senior Member
3,844 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: Damansara Utama


Sorry supposed to type BY not MY. HAHA. Albert's 135. (:
TSamadeo
post Nov 4 2009, 12:34 AM

Mafia
*******
Senior Member
3,503 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: ..Whenever i may roam...
currently, only minolta, sigma & sony got 50mm prime
hazril
post Nov 4 2009, 12:34 AM

.: This Is Brazil! :.
*******
Senior Member
3,070 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Damansara



just got back from TT....demm poisonous la wey...demmit....!!!

QUOTE(gacktleong @ Nov 3 2009, 09:29 PM)
meaning using f42 can wireless control the flash without trigger?
*
yup...thats the beauty....

QUOTE(littleway @ Nov 3 2009, 09:59 PM)
I was considering the same question... My Tamron hunts terribly in low light condition and the picture is very soft. Hence it doesn't give me any advantage of shooting at F/2.8 in low light. However it is sharp in well lighted situation. On the other hand, SAL16105 has a better range compared to Tamron 17-50. Really hard to justify the worthiness of selling the Tamron in order to get SAL16105. sad.gif
*
i like tammy....MFD just dem kinky woo....as albert said just now,"u dont need to frame properly,it can produce nice angle pix".
lildaredevil906
post Nov 4 2009, 12:35 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
357 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: PJ/KL


no la .. albnok brought the 135mm cz.. power i tell u..

mike: albnoks is a minolta 50mm 1.7 i think

nvm got fast response =P

This post has been edited by lildaredevil906: Nov 4 2009, 12:36 AM
ieR
post Nov 4 2009, 12:36 AM

~Cursed Member~
Group Icon
Elite
3,928 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak
for those who thinks A200/300 focusing system is terrible, or tamron so called 3rd party lens, and lenses that make ur machine works below par performance.

and u arent me, so u wont know how i feel. my camera have backfocus problem since DAY 1, send to sony centre twice, they DID NOTHING.... nothing i focus ever is in focus. but due to practise, i manage to use my head/mind and body to compasate it, by adjusting my body everytime i shoot, to get accurate focus.

maybe because, u guys been playing with good accurate machine this while, thus u may had set the "margin" of performance at a little higher, thus a small misfocus or problem, u think ur camera is not up to it.

for me, i brought a faulty body. sony didnt fix it for me. so i live with a terrible result, thus i created a low performance 'margin' so everytime i shoot something resulting sharp and nice, i am very happy and think that the camera is doing it's best.


2 week ago, thanks to CLIVENGU who guide me to open up my camera and tweak/calibrate it. now everything i shoot is accurate, even without flash attach for its illuminator. this is a miracle, the machine perform wayyyyyy better then expected. wayyy pass my old 'margin' now my camera felt like a new A310, replacement for my A300 with more accurate focus!.

"cover my eye to shoot also sharp like needles."
lwliam
post Nov 4 2009, 12:36 AM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


QUOTE(Mikeshashimi @ Nov 4 2009, 12:32 AM)
aih.... but i tot albnok's one is not sony?  rclxub.gif

owh ya, didnt say hi to u just now. sorry.
*
All Sony adapts the A-mount from the Minolta..

its a minolta 50mm 1.4

u were sitting quite far, hehe, sorry for that too... voice couldnt reach that far
ieR
post Nov 4 2009, 12:38 AM

~Cursed Member~
Group Icon
Elite
3,928 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak
QUOTE(lildaredevil906 @ Nov 4 2009, 12:35 AM)
no la .. albnok brought the 135mm cz.. power i tell u..

mike: albnoks is a minolta 50mm 1.7 i think

nvm got fast response =P
*
minolta F1.4 wink.gif i played with it before, and i like it more then SAL one... dunno why, sumore the coating is purple. ours is green

This post has been edited by ieR: Nov 4 2009, 12:40 AM
Mikeshashimi
post Nov 4 2009, 12:38 AM

10 Years on LYN
*******
Senior Member
4,053 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: Kuching


ok cool. thanks for the clarification..

lol.. everyone was using a300,a700,a900....



This post has been edited by Mikeshashimi: Nov 4 2009, 12:39 AM
hazril
post Nov 4 2009, 12:39 AM

.: This Is Brazil! :.
*******
Senior Member
3,070 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Damansara



that side talking about IT already...we still poisoning ourself.... tongue.gif
lildaredevil906
post Nov 4 2009, 12:39 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
357 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: PJ/KL


QUOTE(ieR @ Nov 4 2009, 12:36 AM)
for those who thinks A200/300 focusing system is terrible, or tamron so called 3rd party lens, and lenses that make ur machine works below par performance.

and u arent me, so u wont know how i feel. my camera have backfocus problem since DAY 1, send to sony centre twice, they DID NOTHING.... nothing i focus ever is in focus. but due to practise, i manage to use my head/mind and body to compasate it, by adjusting my body everytime i shoot, to get accurate focus.

maybe because, u guys been playing with good accurate machine this while, thus u may had set the "margin" of performance at a little higher, thus a small misfocus or problem, u think ur camera is not up to it.

for me, i brought a faulty body. sony didnt fix it for me. so i live with a terrible result, thus i created a low performance 'margin' so everytime i shoot something resulting sharp and nice, i am very happy and think that the camera is doing it's best.
2 week ago, thanks to CLIVENGU who guide me to open up my camera and tweak/calibrate it. now everything i shoot is accurate, even without flash attach for its illuminator. this is a miracle, the machine perform wayyyyyy better then expected. wayyy pass my old 'margin' now my camera felt like a new A310, replacement for my A300 with more accurate focus!.

"cover my eye to shoot also sharp like needles."
*
LOL.. ya clive was telling us.. eh.. have fun with ur new calibrated toy =P

what u said kinda made me curious.. attaching flash to use the iluminator? do u get sharp results?
TSamadeo
post Nov 4 2009, 12:39 AM

Mafia
*******
Senior Member
3,503 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: ..Whenever i may roam...
QUOTE(Mikeshashimi @ Nov 4 2009, 12:38 AM)
ok cool. thanks for the clarification..

lol.. everyone was using a300,a700,a900....
*
no A550 ka?
ieR
post Nov 4 2009, 12:39 AM

~Cursed Member~
Group Icon
Elite
3,928 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak
mikeshashimi: i bet u felt intimated by A700 and 900... last time i joined the TT, i'm like, hide my camera in my bag only....
lwliam
post Nov 4 2009, 12:39 AM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


see, now i poison until will soon hilang RM$$$ in the next 24 hours or less

This post has been edited by lwliam: Nov 4 2009, 12:40 AM
Mikeshashimi
post Nov 4 2009, 12:40 AM

10 Years on LYN
*******
Senior Member
4,053 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: Kuching


QUOTE(hazril @ Nov 4 2009, 12:39 AM)
that side talking about IT already...we still poisoning ourself.... tongue.gif
*
hahhaa... and then change to business proposals and stuff.. laugh.gif
hazril
post Nov 4 2009, 12:40 AM

.: This Is Brazil! :.
*******
Senior Member
3,070 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Damansara



QUOTE(amadeo @ Nov 4 2009, 12:39 AM)
no A550 ka?
*
none la bro...was expecting also... sad.gif
Mikeshashimi
post Nov 4 2009, 12:41 AM

10 Years on LYN
*******
Senior Member
4,053 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: Kuching


QUOTE(amadeo @ Nov 4 2009, 12:39 AM)
no A550 ka?
*
i dont think so...

@ieR : super intimidated.. i was using a100.. so i just... sweat.gif sad.gif
hazril
post Nov 4 2009, 12:41 AM

.: This Is Brazil! :.
*******
Senior Member
3,070 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Damansara



QUOTE(Mikeshashimi @ Nov 4 2009, 12:40 AM)
hahhaa... and then change to business proposals and stuff..  laugh.gif
*
u r which one arr bro...??the short hair or the long hair...???
ieR
post Nov 4 2009, 12:41 AM

~Cursed Member~
Group Icon
Elite
3,928 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak
QUOTE(lildaredevil906 @ Nov 4 2009, 12:39 AM)
LOL.. ya clive was telling us.. eh.. have fun with ur new calibrated toy =P

what u said kinda made me curious.. attaching flash to use the iluminator? do u get sharp results?
*
i wont say sharp, because sharpness depends on DOF... u wan sharp, F8... hahahaha

but i think the answer to ur question is, "it's more accurate".

125 Pages « < 42 43 44 45 46 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0279sec    0.79    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 10:26 PM