yup... pure performance wise, SU7300 should ve a little edge, and it wins in battery life as well...

however, since u mentioned Flash, with the upcoming Flash 10.1, my opinion is that AMD platform is a better choice, since HD4225 will be able to provide hardware acceleration for Flash 10.1...

How did you know? Will ATi 5470 support Flash 10.1 as well? Coz 13R is still my choice..

Flash 10.1 supports hardware acceleration by GPU with Unified Stream architecture, which basically mean any GPU (integrated included) of GeForce 8 or later and Radeon HD2000 or later will support that...

what abt atom 330 in asus eee pc 1201n?

wat abt it???

how is the 330 processor compared to the new n450? thinking of getting Asus Eee PC 1201N

Well, for sure it's better than N450, since it's dual core. However, do take note that 330 is designed for nettop instead, thus having a much higher power consumption.

a quick question here...

AMD athlon II P320 (2.1ghz) and Intel Core Duo T4400 (2.2ghz)

which is better?...performance and heat management wise...Both are 45nm.. 1M L2 cache...

I got question about 2 core and 4 core. is 4 core better than 2 core?

simpler answer - 4.

usage?

This is for sure, 4 core sure is better than 2 core, but then again....i ask again, Usage??

it really depends on ur work...

Core i7 720QM shines in apps like photoshop...

however it gets pwned kao kao by Core i7 620M in 3D Mark...

if i wanna play games? 4 core or 2 core?

depends on which camp u re looking at...

Intel, Core i7 600M or Core i5 500M are much better than the quad due to the clock...

AMD - Phenom II x4 or Phenom II x3... highly clocked quad/tri core compared to Intel...

thanks for the list

Whoa2 wait. Nettop? Different than netbook? Oh right, google is my friend.

Lol...i also wanna ask same question...can any1 enlighten me? how bout tis 2 compare vit i3? i3 pawn them ? i mean in performance

yeah, i3 will pwn them in terms of performance...

Intel officially launched the new ULV CPU...

Core i7-600UM – 32nm Arrandale, dual core with HTT, 1.33GHz, 4MB L3 cache, 2500MHz DMI, Turbo @ 2.40GHz, GPU @ 500MHz, 18W TDP
Core i5-500UM - 32nm Arrandale, dual core with HTT, 1.20GHz, 3MB L3 cache, 2500MHz DMI, Turbo @ 2.20GHz, GPU @ 500MHz, 18W TDP
Core i5-400UM - 32nm Arrandale, dual core with HTT, 1.20GHz, 3MB L3 cache, 2500MHz DMI, Turbo @ 1.73GHz, GPU @ 500MHz, 18W TDP
Core i3-300UM - 32nm Arrandale, dual core with HTT, 1.20GHz, 3MB L3 cache, 2500MHz DMI, GPU @ 500MHz, 18W TDP
Pentium U5000 - 32nm Arrandale, dual core, 1.20GHz, 3MB L3 cache, 2500MHz DMI, GPU @ 500MHz, 18W TDP
Celeron U3000 - 32nm Arrandale, dual core, 1.06GHz, 2MB L3 cache, 2500MHz DMI, GPU @ 500MHz, 18W TDP

replacing:

Core 2 Duo SU9000 – 45nm Penryn DC, dual core, 1.20-1.60GHz, 3MB L2 cache, 800MHz FSB, 10W TDP
Core 2 Duo SU7000 – 45nm Penryn DC, dual core, 1.30GHz, 3MB L2 cache, 800MHz FSB, 10W TDP
Pentium SU4000 – 45nm Penryn DC, dual core, 1.30GHz, 2MB L2 cache, 800MHz FSB, 10W TDP
Celeron SU2000 – 45nm Penryn DC, dual core, 1.20GHz, 1MB L2 cache, 800MHz FSB, 10W TDP

guy , i wanna compare core i3-330M and core i3 350m what is the advantage of it if compare to P6000 and T6570 ~
which one performance better ??