Hardcore:
Core i7 Extreme-900XM – 45nm Clarksfield, quad core with HTT, 2.00-2.13GHz, 8MB L3 cache, 2500MHz DMI, Turbo @ 2/2/8/9, DDR3 1333MHz, 55W TDP

Performance:
Core i7-800QM – 45nm Clarksfield, quad core with HTT, 1.73 - 1.86GHz, 8MB L3 cache, 2500MHz DMI, Turbo @ 2/2/8/10, DDR3 1333MHz, 45W TDP
Core i7-700QM – 45nm Clarksfield, quad core with HTT, 1.60 - 1.73GHz, 6MB L3 cache, 2500MHz DMI, Turbo @ 1/1/6/9, DDR3 1333MHz, 45W TDP
Core i7-600M – 32nm Arrandale, dual core wit HTT, 2.66GHz, 4MB L3 cache, 2500MHz DMI, Turbo @ 3.30GHz, GPU @ 766MHz, DDR3 1066MHz, 35W TDP

Mainstream:
Core i5-500M – 32nm Arrandale, dual core with HTT, 2.40-2.53GHz, 3MB L3 cache, 2500MHz DMI, Turbo @ 2.93-3.06GHz, GPU @ 766MHz, DDR3 1066MHz, 35W TDP
Core i5-400M – 32nm Arrandale, dual core with HTT, 2.26GHz, 3MB L3 cache, 2500MHz DMI, Turbo @ 2.53GHz, GPU @ 766MHz, DDR3 1066MHz, 35W TDP

Value:
Core i3-300M – 32nm Arrandale, dual core with HTT, 2.13-2.26GHz, 3MB L3 cache, 2500MHz DMI, GPU @ 667MHz, DDR3 1066MHz, 35W TDP
Pentium P6000 - 32nm Arrandale, dual core, 1.86 GHz, 3MB L3 cache, 4.8GT/s DMI, GPU @ 667MHz, DDR3 1066MHz, 35W TDP
Celeron P4000 – 32nm Arrandale, dual core, 1.86GHz, 2MB L3 cache, 2500MHz DMI, GPU @ 667MHz, DDR3 1066MHz, 35W TDP


Low Voltage:
Core i7-600LM – 32nm Arrandale, dual core with HTT, 2.00-2.13GHz, 4MB L3 cache, 2500MHz DMI, Turbo @ 2.80-2.93GHz, GPU @ 566MHz, 25W TDP

Ultra-low Vlotage:
Core i7-600UM – 32nm Arrandale, dual core with HTT, 1.06 - 1.33GHz, 4MB L3 cache, 2500MHz DMI, Turbo @ 2.40GHz, GPU @ 500MHz, DDR3 800MHz, 18W TDP
Core i5-500UM - 32nm Arrandale, dual core with HTT, 1.20GHz, 3MB L3 cache, 2500MHz DMI, Turbo @ 2.20GHz, GPU @ 500MHz, DDR3 800MHz, 18W TDP
Core i5-400UM - 32nm Arrandale, dual core with HTT, 1.20GHz, 3MB L3 cache, 2500MHz DMI, Turbo @ 1.73GHz, GPU @ 500MHz, DDR3 800MHz, 18W TDP
Core i3-300UM - 32nm Arrandale, dual core with HTT, 1.20GHz, 3MB L3 cache, 2500MHz DMI, GPU @ 500MHz, DDR3 800MHz, 18W TDP
Pentium U5000 - 32nm Arrandale, dual core, 1.20GHz, 3MB L3 cache, 2500MHz DMI, GPU @ 500MHz, DDR3 800MHz, 18W TDP
Celeron U3000 - 32nm Arrandale, dual core, 1.06GHz, 2MB L3 cache, 2500MHz DMI, GPU @ 500MHz, DDR3 800MHz, 18W TDP

Netbook:
Atom N405 – 45nm Pineview, single core with HTT, 1.66-1.83GHz, 512KB L2 cache, 2500MHz DMI, GPU @ 200MHz, DDR3 800MHz, 5.5-6.5WW TDP
Atom N400 – 45nm Pineview, single core with HTT, 1.66-1.83GHz, 512KB L2 cache, 2500MHz DMI, GPU @ 200MHz, DDR2 800MHz, 5.5-6.5WW TDP

Note:
1. GREY indicates upcoming product/s
2. STRIKEOFF = EOL-ed product (means no longer in production, but u will probably still find them in the market)



Hardcore:
Phenom II Quad Core Black Edition X900 – 45nm Champlain, quad core, 2.30GHz, 4x 512KB L2 cache, 3600MHz HT, 45W TDP
Phenom II Dual Core Black Edition X600 – 45nm Champlain, dual core, 3.10GHz, 2x 512KB L2 cache, 36000MHz HT, 45W TDP

Performance:
Phenom II Quad Core N900 – 45nm Champlain, quad core, 2.00GHz, 4x 512KB L2 cache, 3600MHz HT, 35W TDP
Phenom II Quad Core P900 – 45nm Champlain, quad core, 1.60GHz, 4x 512KB L2 cache, 3600MHz HT, 25W TDP
Phenom II Triple Core N800 – 45nm Champlain, tri core, 2.10GHz, 3x 512KB L2 cache, 3600MHz HT, 35W TDP
Phenom II Triple Core P800 – 45nm Champlain, tri core, 1.80GHz, 3x 512KB L2 cache, 3600MHz HT, 25W TDP
Phenom II Dual Core P600 – 45nm Champlain, dual core, 2.80GHz, 2x 512KB L2 cache, 3600MHz HT, 35W TDP

Mainstream:
Turion II Dual Core N500 – 45nm Champlain, dual core, 2.50GHz, 2x 1MB L2 cache, 3600MHz HT, 35W TDP
Turion II Dual Core P500 – 45nm Champlain, dual core, 2.30GHz, 2x 1MB L2 cache, 3600MHz HT, 25W TDP

Value:
Athlon II Dual Core N300 – 45nm Champlain, dual core, 2.30GHz, 2x 512KB L2 cache, 3600MHz HT, 35W TDP
Athlon II Dual Core P300 – 45nm Champlain, dual core, 2.10GHz, 2x 512KB L2 cache, 3600MHz HT, 25W TDP
V-series V100 – 45nm Champlain, single core, 1.20-2.20GHz, 512KB L2 cache, 3600MHz HT, 25W TDP

Ultra-thin:
Zacate dual core - 40nm Ontario, dual core, DX11, 24W TDP
Zacate single core - 40nm Ontario, single core, DX11, 18W TDP
Turion II Neo Dual Core K600 - 45nm Geneva, dual core, 1.50-1.70GHz, 2x 1MB L2 cache, 3200MHz HT, 15W TDP
Athlon II Neo Dual Core K300 - 45nm Geneva, dual core, 1.30GHz, 2x 1MB L2 cache, 2000MHz HT, 15W TDP
Athlon II Neo K100 - 45nm Geneva, single core, 1.70GHz, 1MB L2 cache, 2000MHz HT, 12W TDP
V-series V100 - 45nm Geneva, single core, 1.20GHz, 512KB L2 cache, 2000MHz HT, 9W TDP

Note:
1. GREY indicates upcoming product/s
2. STRIKEOFF = EOL-ed product (means no longer in production, but u will probably still find them in the market)
3. Italic = announced future product


This post has been edited by astria: Sep 13 2010, 02:30 PM

So by means that Core i7 is perfect for ultra-multitasking jobs like video rendering/editing or maybe doing multimedia type of jobs...

but not recommended for those hardcore gamers??

yup, that would be the case...

let me quote Intel (for the third time, or maybe fourth) again: Core i7 is not designed for gamers...

gamers go Core i5... hardcore gamers fo Phenom II...

Just like the same case back then with P4 HT.

It doesnt really give much performance boost to gamers,except games that is optimised for it.

Thinking back to that time,how many games were optimised for HT?

as far as i know, RE5 only.

I mean the games back then,in 2004 or 2005?

Isnt the current HT technology in i7 similar to the ones back in P4?

nah... they are different...

previously it was called SMP (Simultaneous Multi-thread sth??? can't really remember...), it only shortly before Core i7 launch last year that Intel decided to call it Hyper Threading as well for simplicity sake...

now want buy a laptop, better buy i7 spec laptop if don't want outdated later on.

This post has been edited by stlkelvin: Oct 12 2009, 08:36 PM

this i beg to differ...

Core i7 is juz totally overkill for many people...

rather, i would suggest wait for Core i5, which is better suited for gamers (at least), and cheaper as well...

^ +1.
agree

assuming i want to do video editing and rendering on a laptop (yes, yes, get a desktop blablabla, am a student, need the portability)

will i7 be better or should i wait for i5 as well?

i do play games but not a whole lot, i7 cant be that bad for games right?

the keyword again is optimization...

check and see if the software that u re going to use and see if they are optimized for HT...

Core i7 itself is a quad core proc with HT, so it doesnt make that much of a differences if any software or games are not optimized for it.

performance will drop if the software is not optimized... iirc, game performance dropped by as much as 20% when HT is enabled... u re better off without HT in cases like this...

it's different from the case where u run a dual core optimized software on a quad core...

Doesnt make much of a difference i7 HT enabled and i5 non HT. The higher end model would compensate the HT performance drop with its higher speed/cache/qpi architecture.

i7 and i5 are basically the same stuff, so cache and QPI are basically the same...

as for speed, imho i5 will probably be able to match wat i7 can run at... since disabling HT will result in lower power consumption, and thus the speed can be pushed further...

a very rough assumption...

i7 at 2GHz running a non-HT optimized software, is as good as i5 running at 1.6-1.8GHz...

so basically u re paying more money for the same performance, and a feature that u re not going to use...

They are basically the same, but QPI speeds are diff bro. Dont forget the Turbo Boost feature also as the max speed achievable differs between those i5 and i7.

I was under the impression that the mobile i7 uses DMI instead of QPI. Am I wrong?

yup, Clarksfield uses DMI juz like Lynnfield...

lets say core i7 and Phenom2 X4 955... what is the disadvantage that AMD have?.. but i see all proc works all the same.... loadlng.. gaming etc.. some advice from the guru's pls ^^