Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Hardware CPU comparison list
|
monza84
|
Apr 16 2010, 07:38 AM
|
|
QUOTE(shadowshine @ Apr 10 2010, 12:32 AM) Compare between the new "VALUE" Core i3-300M and the old "MAINSTREAM" Intel Core 2 Duo T6570... which is better overall? Why?  Future-proof & newer technology then Core i3 should be over C2D T6570  ..the clock are identical but for sure i3 is cooler then T6570 Added on April 16, 2010, 7:38 amand also consumed less power which extend the battery life for the laptop This post has been edited by monza84: Apr 16 2010, 07:38 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
leyley
|
Apr 25 2010, 10:13 PM
|
|
how many cell ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
lowyard
|
May 14 2010, 01:10 AM
|
|
Now I really need to know the difference in terms of processing power between Intel® Core™2 Duo processor SU7300 and Intel® Core™ i5-430M Processor. There are reasons why I wanted to asked this. First, the SU7300 is only a C2D family which in my understanding came from the old family compared to Core i family. Second, SU7300 consume lower power compared to 430M which I believe is less powerful. Third, but the SU7300 is in use with the Alienware M11x which is meant for gaming (of course with GC as well).
So, does that mean SU7300 is more than enough for gaming? How about using the processor for video/flash/photo editing?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fantasia
|
May 14 2010, 01:48 AM
|
|
by right SU processor main idea is to save energy and not compensate so much performance as atom. SU can use for video/photo/ flash edit. it's just the matter is how fast it get ur job done.m11x excel in those game that use graphic card but when come to processor hunger game then it will be struggling...
|
|
|
|
|
|
lowyard
|
May 14 2010, 02:04 AM
|
|
Thanks for your answer!
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
May 14 2010, 09:17 AM
|
|
actually, the architecture of Core and Nehalem stays pretty much the same... main difference between Core 2 and Core i is the integration of memory controller, the integration of graphic accelerator (for dual cores), and the replacement of FSB with DMI instead...
the main advantage of Nehalem is the jump in memory bandwidth and lowered memory latency, coupled with some tweaking in power consumption... other than that, the 2 are pretty much the same, battery life included (for the same TDP)...
|
|
|
|
|
|
lowyard
|
May 14 2010, 07:31 PM
|
|
Whoa wait. x64 7 Home Premium on N450 with 1GB RAM? How's it goin'? Really keen to know the performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
May 14 2010, 07:34 PM
|
|
QUOTE(lowyard @ May 14 2010, 07:31 PM) Whoa wait. x64 7 Home Premium on N450 with 1GB RAM? How's it goin'? Really keen to know the performance. u mean my netbook???  pretty snappy response, honestly speaking... juz dun open too many programs and u re fine...
|
|
|
|
|
|
lowyard
|
May 14 2010, 07:56 PM
|
|
Wow really?.. Cool. I gotta try that out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fantasia
|
May 14 2010, 09:52 PM
|
|
QUOTE(astria @ May 14 2010, 07:34 PM) u mean my netbook???  pretty snappy response, honestly speaking... juz dun open too many programs and u re fine... well, atom is not made for multi-tasking 1 ma
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
May 14 2010, 09:53 PM
|
|
so yeah, knows it's limit and u re fine... however, i am currently folding with it as well...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fantasia
|
May 14 2010, 09:54 PM
|
|
-.-" r u serious?? how is it perform?? PPD??
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
May 14 2010, 09:58 PM
|
|
juz installed FAHSpy again... waitiing for it to refresh... Added on May 14, 2010, 10:00 pm48PPD...  Added on May 14, 2010, 10:03 pmbut heck, CPU WU typically have a deadline of 1 mth... that is already fast enough... This post has been edited by astria: May 14 2010, 10:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
lowyard
|
May 15 2010, 12:37 AM
|
|
Wow, you guys really enthusiastic about those folding project. In contrast, my Cell-equipped console just serve for entertainment purpose only.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fantasia
|
May 15 2010, 01:10 AM
|
|
QUOTE(astria @ May 14 2010, 09:58 PM) juz installed FAHSpy again... waitiing for it to refresh... Added on May 14, 2010, 10:00 pm48PPD...  Added on May 14, 2010, 10:03 pmbut heck, CPU WU typically have a deadline of 1 mth... that is already fast enough... 48PPD pretty good for atom...
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
May 15 2010, 07:39 AM
|
|
QUOTE(lowyard @ May 15 2010, 12:37 AM) Wow, you guys really enthusiastic about those folding project. In contrast, my Cell-equipped console just serve for entertainment purpose only. well, it's a way to fully utilize the CPU resources, and volunteer without disrupting ur own daily schedule...  moreover it can help other ppl... so why not?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
May 15 2010, 08:13 AM
|
|
updated with AMD's Geneva Ultrathin CPU...
|
|
|
|
|
|
lee_what2004
|
May 15 2010, 08:17 AM
|
*stare* ji--------
|
Core i7-600M – 32nm Arrandale, dual core wit HTT, 2.66GHz, 4MB L3 cache, 2500MHz DMI, Turbo @ 3.20GHz, GPU @ 766MHz, 35W TDP
Shouldn't it Turbo @ 3.33GHz ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
May 15 2010, 08:42 AM
|
|
QUOTE(lee_what2004 @ May 15 2010, 08:17 AM) Core i7-600M – 32nm Arrandale, dual core wit HTT, 2.66GHz, 4MB L3 cache, 2500MHz DMI, Turbo @ 3.20GHz, GPU @ 766MHz, 35W TDP Shouldn't it Turbo @ 3.33GHz ? corrected...  Added on May 15, 2010, 8:45 amoh, and i ve to add on, AMD's Ultrathin is looking more and more interesting... This post has been edited by astria: May 15 2010, 08:45 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
lowyard
|
May 15 2010, 05:05 PM
|
|
According to fantasia, SU7300 can process video/photo/flash editing. So the processor used by Dell M301z can do the same as well? Since it's in the same category as Intel's.. But of course, it's the matter of how fast it'll encode/decode/process the job, right?
|
|
|
|
|