QUOTE(lwliam @ Sep 16 2009, 01:46 PM)
spec for spec, i'd go for the any lower end sony compared to any lower end N or C. u can get a lot of 'tool' from the sony, unavailable in the other 2 brands. of coz when u look at midrange bodies, it's a whole different story altogether.
my personal advice is that at the low end, u can quite count Nikon out of the equation as it offers the least functions and priced quite the same as other brands.
Hit right on the spot!.. my personal advice is that at the low end, u can quite count Nikon out of the equation as it offers the least functions and priced quite the same as other brands.
This is why i ended up choosig a300 rather that the Nikon d40 or the d60..
With the $$ you pay for the A300, function wise, not there la for the d40
QUOTE(clivengu @ Sep 16 2009, 02:46 PM)
& since i don hv zoom lens... i used my 50mm to shoot "telephoto" shots. Example shoot artist on stage using F1.4, but go home i hv to crop it like 50%... then it works nicely... as long as i don do large print. i rather do this using the prime lens than the kit lens at 70mm due to its sharpness..
eh.. nice.. i never thought of it.. Quality wise, still good right?
This post has been edited by lildaredevil906: Sep 16 2009, 03:23 PM
Sep 16 2009, 03:21 PM

Quote


0.0282sec
0.56
6 queries
GZIP Disabled