later other ppl may tot mazda 3 onli come in 1 color
Mazda 3 2010 & Mazdaspeed 3, Overview,Chicks,Mazda 3 MPS,Video Review
Mazda 3 2010 & Mazdaspeed 3, Overview,Chicks,Mazda 3 MPS,Video Review
|
|
Jul 3 2009, 12:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
310 posts Joined: Jan 2008 |
later other ppl may tot mazda 3 onli come in 1 color |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 3 2009, 03:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,438 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
gold also nice but Japan discontinue this color.only first batch got this color
|
|
|
Jul 3 2009, 06:45 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
i seriously dono why red colour but interior like that lor ( black top beige bottom)..so disappointing...
This post has been edited by kokben: Jul 3 2009, 06:45 PM |
|
|
Jul 7 2009, 05:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
512 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
A comparison between the Mazda 3 2.0L Sedan and the Peugeot 308 Turbo.
Advantage marked with (A). Each car have their own significant advantages over the other, at the end of the day - you choose the poison that suits you best Price Mazda 3 2.0L (CBU) Sedan Price: RM 129,999.00 Peugeot 308 Turbo (CKD) Price: RM 113,888.00 Price advantage: Peugeot 308 Turbo Quality advantage: Mazda 3 CBU Resale value: Even for both marques Power: Mazda 3 2.0L Sedan Output: 108kW / 6500RPM Torque: 182Nm / 4000RPM Fuel Capacity: 55L Features: SVT, Electronic Throttle Control Peugeot 308 Turbo Output: 103kW / 6000RPM Torque: 240nM / 1400RPM Fuel Capacity: 60L Features: BMW Valvetronic system on intake side, gasoline direct injection Power advantage: Mazda 3 Torque advantage: Peugeot 308 Turbo Note: The engine found in the Peugeot 308 Turbo is the same engine found in the BMW Mini-Cooper Transmission: Mazda 3 2.0L Sedan 5 speed AT Activematic Electric power assisted steering Peugeot 308 Turbo 4 Speed AT Porsche Tiptronic System Electric power assisted steering Advantage: Mazda 3 gains the advantage with an extra gear Dimensions: Mazda 3 2.0L L: 4580mm W: 1755mm H: 1470mm WB: 2640 Boot Space: 335L Peugeot 308 Turbo L: 4276 W: 1815mm H: 1498 WB: 2608 Boot Space: 430L Dimension: Even for both cars Bootspace advantage: Peugeot 308 Turbo. Oddly enough, the Mazda 3 Sedan suffers from very poor cargo space compared to the hatchback version which comes with a whopping 480L of bootspace Equipment Mazda 3 2.0L Sedan Multi-Information Display Dual-zone Automatic Climate-control Aircon with Pollen filter Keyless smart entry system c/w alarm & immobilizer (A) 17 inch wheels Steering Controls c/w paddle shifters c/w cruise control (A) Auto dimming rear view mirror In-dash 6-CD/MP3/WMA player with AUX connection point for external audio sources and 6 speakers audio unit Tilt and telescopic steering wheel Center Console Box with Sliding Armrest Power folding mirrors with turn indicators Rain sensing wipers Fabric seats and leather wrapped steering LED Rear Combination Lamps (A) 60:40 split folding rear seat Peugeot 308 Turbo Trip computer Dual zone Automactic Climate Control Aircon with active carbon & pollen filter and air conditioned glove box and fragrance diffuser Keyless entry system c/w alarm & immobilizer Rear passenger air-con vents (A) Steering with audio remote control and cruise control with speed limiter 17 inch wheels Panoramic Sunroof (A) Auto dimming rear view mirror RD4 Radio/ MP3 CD Player and 6 speaker system + AUX connection point for external audio sources Tilt and telescopic steering wheel Power folding mirrors with turn indicators Auto wipers Fabric seats with leather wrapped steering Adjustable front centre armrest with built in storage compartment Rear parcel shelf storage (accessible from passenger and boot compartments) (A) Driver and front passenger under seat storage drawers (A) 60:40 split folding rear seat Advantage: Clearly both cars have certain advantages over each other. Safety features Mazda 3 2.0L Sedan Bixenon project headlamps with Auto-levelling and autolights sensor Fog lamps (front) Black-out meter instrumental panel ABS+EBD+BA Ventilated front disc and rear disc brakes Active headrest Crushable brake pedal Collapsible steering column Maidas body 6 Airbags (2 front, 2 side, 2 curtain) Peugeot 308 Turbo Project Headlights with “Follow Me Home” and Daytime Running Lights (DRL) and autolights sensor Fog lamps (front and rear) ABS+EBD+BA + Traction control, stability control and stability program Ventilated front disc and rear disc brakes Active headrest Detachable brake pedal Collapsible steering column 5 Star EuroNCAP ratings 6 Airbags (2 front, 2 side, 2 curtain) ISOFIX seats Advantage: The Peugeot 308 Turbo is the clear winner in the safety features section. This post has been edited by zweimmk: Jul 9 2009, 11:19 AM |
|
|
Jul 7 2009, 11:50 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
363 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
singapore Mazda3 with keyless
![]() Mazda3 specifications This post has been edited by alrasla: Jul 7 2009, 11:52 PM |
|
|
Jul 8 2009, 08:40 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,943 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: - Johore - |
6 airbags and the features would definitely give a bump to Civic, Altis, Sylphy and Lancer that is around the pricing range
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 8 2009, 10:14 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,355 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Cera |
QUOTE(zweimmk @ Jul 7 2009, 05:27 PM) A comparison between the Mazda 3 2.0L Sedan and the Peugeot 308 Turbo. Good comparison, but it seems like the 308 Turbo is the better deal here. Sure, it loses out on the transmission but the turbocharged French lion does have more growl under the hood with a higher torque at much lower rpms. And it's probably a safer choice with ESP and traction control, just in case you put two wheels into the gravel or skid in the rain.Advantage marked with (A). Each car have their own significant advantages over the other, at the end of the day - you choose the poison that suits you best » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Equipment-wise, the lack of cruise control in the Peugeot is somewhat annoying, but things like keyless entry is more of a fancy add-on rather than necessity. Same goes with leather seats and LED lamps. The sedan 3's pathetic bootspace is appalling, so it's better to get the hatch instead. Design wise I personally prefer the 308. Both have gaping mouths and slanted eyes but the Mazda's overwhelming lines is too radical for my liking, but of course, aesthetics are usually subjective. At the end of the day, the lower price of the 308 will be the deciding factor. A whopping saving of 16K is something that has to be considered. Oddly enough, over here in Australia the 3 costs 27-28KAUD while the Peugeot goes for 33-35K depending on accessories; and therefore the better choice points towards Japanese. This post has been edited by StarGhazzer: Jul 8 2009, 10:20 AM |
|
|
Jul 8 2009, 10:33 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
well..308 design not as futuristic as mazda 3...that's 1..plus in malaysia
308 is CKD by naza..so...it can be a good buy if u dont mine CKD or CBU.. while mazda 3 is imported from Japan.... really depends on each individual what they are looking for...but it's gonna be hard if someone need to decide between 308 or mazda 3... |
|
|
Jul 8 2009, 12:20 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
5 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
Mazda3 Bootspace
Sedan 430litres Hatchback 340litres Pug 308 420 litres Source: Respective UK brochures This post has been edited by heeman: Jul 8 2009, 03:21 PM |
|
|
Jul 8 2009, 12:55 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
512 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(StarGhazzer @ Jul 8 2009, 10:14 AM) Good comparison, but it seems like the 308 Turbo is the better deal here. Sure, it loses out on the transmission but the turbocharged French lion does have more growl under the hood with a higher torque at much lower rpms. And it's probably a safer choice with ESP and traction control, just in case you put two wheels into the gravel or skid in the rain. There is cruise control in the Malaysian spec Peugeot 308 Turbo.Equipment-wise, the lack of cruise control in the Peugeot is somewhat annoying, but things like keyless entry is more of a fancy add-on rather than necessity. Same goes with leather seats and LED lamps. The sedan 3's pathetic bootspace is appalling, so it's better to get the hatch instead. Design wise I personally prefer the 308. Both have gaping mouths and slanted eyes but the Mazda's overwhelming lines is too radical for my liking, but of course, aesthetics are usually subjective. At the end of the day, the lower price of the 308 will be the deciding factor. A whopping saving of 16K is something that has to be considered. Oddly enough, over here in Australia the 3 costs 27-28KAUD while the Peugeot goes for 33-35K depending on accessories; and therefore the better choice points towards Japanese. Equipment wise - except for paddle shifters and bi-xenon headlights, everything else can be done or obtained with aftermarket parts. Even push/start stop smart entry system is obtainable in the aftermarket if you're willing to spend and modify your car a little. As far as support goes, I think Naza/Nasim is doing a pretty good job with Peugeot right now. They just seem more aggressive in pushing and promoting their products as compared to Mazda. Even on the road, you see more Peugeots out there than Mazdas. If this trend continues, even resale value will swing in favor towards Peugeot. |
|
|
Jul 8 2009, 03:37 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
97 posts Joined: May 2008 |
QUOTE(zweimmk @ Jul 8 2009, 12:55 PM) There is cruise control in the Malaysian spec Peugeot 308 Turbo. These two cars are no doubt ahead of the pack...I think is easy to make your decision since, one is sedan and the other is a hatchback...turbo/non turbo.......one is CBU Japan and the other is a CKD Naza...Equipment wise - except for paddle shifters and bi-xenon headlights, everything else can be done or obtained with aftermarket parts. Even push/start stop smart entry system is obtainable in the aftermarket if you're willing to spend and modify your car a little. As far as support goes, I think Naza/Nasim is doing a pretty good job with Peugeot right now. They just seem more aggressive in pushing and promoting their products as compared to Mazda. Even on the road, you see more Peugeots out there than Mazdas. If this trend continues, even resale value will swing in favor towards Peugeot. Naza doing a good job now??? Marketing yes, after sales???? Added on July 8, 2009, 3:51 pm QUOTE(zweimmk @ Jun 29 2009, 02:11 PM) As a matter of personal opinion - the keyless push/start stop engine button is nice to have but it is not critical. I do drive my sis-in-law's BMW 320i which comes this feature so my experience is it's nice to have but the novelty wore out for me after 2 weeks Try using this feature for 2 months... This is an excellent feature to have and also play a part in safety. I have seen many women searching for their car key while walking to their car or next to their car. Imagine what can happen to them......If they have this feature, they can just walk straight to their car and open the door... Added on July 8, 2009, 4:09 pm QUOTE(StarGhazzer @ Jul 8 2009, 10:14 AM) At the end of the day, the lower price of the 308 will be the deciding factor. A whopping saving of 16K is something that has to be considered. Oddly enough, over here in Australia the 3 costs 27-28KAUD while the Peugeot goes for 33-35K depending on accessories; and therefore the better choice points towards Japanese. This post has been edited by iceman08: Jul 8 2009, 04:09 PM |
|
|
Jul 8 2009, 07:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,355 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Cera |
QUOTE(zweimmk @ Jul 8 2009, 12:55 PM) There is cruise control in the Malaysian spec Peugeot 308 Turbo. My bad... missed out on the cruise control on the 308. Equipment wise - except for paddle shifters and bi-xenon headlights, everything else can be done or obtained with aftermarket parts. Even push/start stop smart entry system is obtainable in the aftermarket if you're willing to spend and modify your car a little. As far as support goes, I think Naza/Nasim is doing a pretty good job with Peugeot right now. They just seem more aggressive in pushing and promoting their products as compared to Mazda. Even on the road, you see more Peugeots out there than Mazdas. If this trend continues, even resale value will swing in favor towards Peugeot. Well that makes the Peugeot an even more attractive package. There are rumours about Nasim's plans to increase the price of their Peugeot models some time later this year, not sure how true that is as I'm not even in M'sia. Even if they increase it to around the same price of the Mazdas/Hondas it will still be an attractive option; but if they jack it up to say 160K or even more it'll be undoing all the good job they have done so far. |
|
|
Jul 9 2009, 01:29 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
i dont mind if can have a push button with the key..like the FD2R.i think it's just nice to have a button to "TURN-ON" the car....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 9 2009, 01:34 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
924 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Kay Ell |
malaysia mazda 3 doesn't comes with leather seat and push start button.
and the resell value i can say mazda 3 deserve the win. malaysia are always prefer japs CBU car rather than conti due to expensive spare part. |
|
|
Jul 9 2009, 03:41 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,125 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Yeah malaysia mazda 3 sport doesn't comes with push start button.
Waiting mazda 3 hatchback see whether they include the push start button or not. Eventhough not really necessary but it's a nice feature to have. |
|
|
Jul 9 2009, 11:10 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
512 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(iceman08 @ Jul 8 2009, 03:37 PM) These two cars are no doubt ahead of the pack...I think is easy to make your decision since, one is sedan and the other is a hatchback...turbo/non turbo.......one is CBU Japan and the other is a CKD Naza... Last time I checked around the forums, Nasim is doing a decent job with its servicing for 407 owners. The 308 is under the Nasim badge as well, so at the very least, it can't be that far off. Parts seemed to be rather well stocked and prices after comparison is rather on par with Japanese makes. We've been through this discussion with the Mazda 6 vs Accord thread, it's the same case here. Since the 308 is on a 20k service interval as well, I doubt it would cost very much more to service the car as you would with a Mazda. Any difference is between the exchange rate vs the yen and the Euro and how much the respective marques want to make off their customers Naza doing a good job now??? Marketing yes, after sales???? Added on July 8, 2009, 3:51 pm Try using this feature for 2 months... This is an excellent feature to have and also play a part in safety. I have seen many women searching for their car key while walking to their car or next to their car. Imagine what can happen to them......If they have this feature, they can just walk straight to their car and open the door... Added on July 8, 2009, 4:09 pm Is not odd actually......This whopping 16K saving thanks to our 'Armno'...got it? Look at how they treat others like Tan Chong etc.... The smart entry feature is very nice to have - I agree. But it's not critical and to be honest, it's not like you can't get this from the aftermarket. It's stuff like paddle shifters or factory fitted Bi-xenon headlights that can't be had even if you have the money to spend. Those are 2 very good things found in the Mazda 3 that is not present in the Peugeot 308 Turbo. But on the other hand, you won't get stuff like Panoramic sunroof or rear air-cond vents in the Mazda 3 either. I don't know about the rest of you but I see it this way: Mazda 3 2.0L Sedan Paddle shifters - Fun (for driver) Bi-Xenon Headlights - Safety (for passengers & driver) Peugeot 308 Turbo Panoramic Sunroof - Fun (for passengers & driver) Rear Aircond vents - Comfort (for passengers) Obtainable items in the aftermarket Leather seats (for both makes) Push start/stop button (for both makes) Wireless smart entry system (for Peugeot 308 Turbo) Comparatively speaking, if it's the Mazda 3 vs other Japanese C-segment sedans found in Malaysia then its a no brainer - I'd take the Mazda 3 any other day. However, if you throw the 308 into the equation and suddenly you're presented with 2 equally stunning offerings: CBU vs CKD (Mazda 3 has the quality advantage here) 16k price difference between Mazda 3 and Peugeot 308 (308 Turbo has the advantage here) Stylish car designs (subjective to individual) Almost equal resale value Attractive equipment offerings from both marques Class leading safety features from both marques (308 Turbo has the bigger edge here) Regardless of what car you choose, you can't really go wrong either way. If budget is a concern then the 308 Turbo is the clear winner, if you are willing to pay that extra for quality then the Mazda 3 2.0L sedan is a good choice as well. |
|
|
Jul 9 2009, 11:52 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
774 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
I heard stories that the Pug 308 with panoramic roof is actually mostly CBU but Naza uses its connections & status to get it declared as full CKD & hence the pricing.
Not sure how true is the story though |
|
|
Jul 9 2009, 01:35 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
97 posts Joined: May 2008 |
QUOTE(zweimmk @ Jul 9 2009, 11:10 AM) Last time I checked around the forums, Nasim is doing a decent job with its servicing for 407 owners. The 308 is under the Nasim badge as well, so at the very least, it can't be that far off. Parts seemed to be rather well stocked and prices after comparison is rather on par with Japanese makes. We've been through this discussion with the Mazda 6 vs Accord thread, it's the same case here. Since the 308 is on a 20k service interval as well, I doubt it would cost very much more to service the car as you would with a Mazda. Any difference is between the exchange rate vs the yen and the Euro and how much the respective marques want to make off their customers Service is not a problem for both car actually.....is not expensive as portray by some Malaysians here. In fact I found out Mazda 6 service is even cheaper than Accord 2.4 as Mazda service interval is 10K instead of 5K. Major service at 50K instead of 20K & major 40K... and don't forget parts for Mazda are from Japan vs Honda Thailand products...The smart entry feature is very nice to have - I agree. But it's not critical and to be honest, it's not like you can't get this from the aftermarket. It's stuff like paddle shifters or factory fitted Bi-xenon headlights that can't be had even if you have the money to spend. Those are 2 very good things found in the Mazda 3 that is not present in the Peugeot 308 Turbo. But on the other hand, you won't get stuff like Panoramic sunroof or rear air-cond vents in the Mazda 3 either. Smart entry is not critical when you don't have it...but once you have it and had it taken away, its like driving a car without power window or reverse sensor...I know because my wife's car doesn't have this feature and sometimes I almost rip the door handle off because i m so use to it open automatically... As i said, these are the two car ppl should consider now...just decide whether to get a hatchback or sedan.....Resale value definitely better on Mazda3.. Added on July 9, 2009, 1:40 pm QUOTE(deeplyheartbroken @ Jul 9 2009, 11:52 AM) I heard stories that the Pug 308 with panoramic roof is actually mostly CBU but Naza uses its connections & status to get it declared as full CKD & hence the pricing. I m not surprise at all if its true....Naza Sorento was declared as 'National Car' and enjoy lower taxes...The only thing I saw from the car as 'National' is the leather seat, rims and tires. The rest are imported from Korea and even the 'NAZA" logo is made in Korea by Hyundai/Kia...Not sure how true is the story though This post has been edited by iceman08: Jul 9 2009, 01:40 PM |
|
|
Jul 9 2009, 02:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
512 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(iceman08 @ Jul 9 2009, 01:35 PM) Service is not a problem for both car actually.....is not expensive as portray by some Malaysians here. In fact I found out Mazda 6 service is even cheaper than Accord 2.4 as Mazda service interval is 10K instead of 5K. Major service at 50K instead of 20K & major 40K... and don't forget parts for Mazda are from Japan vs Honda Thailand products... I don't think I can agree with you on the resale value just yet. Probably in a year from now when and if we have this discussion, we'll probably see something concrete. However, I can say that the Mazda 6 still isn't selling as well as it should be, which is regrettable considering how it absolutely trounches the Camry/Accord. One consolation is that there are more new Mazda 6s now than there are for the older model. Still no concrete info on the M6 resale value yet, perhaps in another year or 2.Smart entry is not critical when you don't have it...but once you have it and had it taken away, its like driving a car without power window or reverse sensor...I know because my wife's car doesn't have this feature and sometimes I almost rip the door handle off because i m so use to it open automatically... As i said, these are the two car ppl should consider now...just decide whether to get a hatchback or sedan.....Resale value definitely better on Mazda3.. Added on July 9, 2009, 1:40 pmI m not surprise at all if its true....Naza Sorento was declared as 'National Car' and enjoy lower taxes...The only thing I saw from the car as 'National' is the leather seat, rims and tires. The rest are imported from Korea and even the 'NAZA" logo is made in Korea by Hyundai/Kia... But like in our previous discussion, resale value is really something that you don't consider as much if you are going to buy either a Mazda or Peugeot. You know for certain, the resale value will at least be 5 to 10% lesser than the typical Camry/Accords or Civic/Corollas. I doubt most people will want to sell their car in 3 years time when they buy either marques. One major flaw in the Mazda 3 is the medicore boot space - 325L is quite appalling in this day and age. Even the Proton Saga BLM gets about 415L of boot space! |
|
|
Jul 9 2009, 05:44 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,413 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: KL - Cardiff - Subang - Sydney |
how is FC of mazda3 2.0 compared to Civic 2.0?
and i heard the back seat of mazda3 is pretty cramped for a 2.0 car.hw true is tht? and hw is comfort,cabin noise compared to civic? nd more comments and suggestion This post has been edited by ZeneticX: Jul 9 2009, 06:14 PM |
| Change to: | 0.0323sec
0.32
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 11:10 PM |