Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
123 Pages « < 31 32 33 34 35 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Starcraft 2 V2, Releasing on 27th of July 2010 :D

views
     
SUSf4tE
post Aug 26 2009, 11:20 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,605 posts

Joined: Nov 2008

oh..i so slowpoke d...
melvintcs
post Aug 27 2009, 08:30 AM

♥ Photography ♪
******
Senior Member
1,350 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
can someone share some starcraft video? i enjoy seeing how they control their race's units. their respond and clicking was so fast.
H@H@
post Aug 27 2009, 10:04 AM

I'M THE TEAMKILLING F***TARD!!!
Group Icon
VIP
6,727 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 6 feet under at Bloodgulch Outpost Alpha Number 1



QUOTE(zioburosky13 @ Aug 26 2009, 10:04 PM)
No one would want to pirate Shakespeare's work for it's not the hottest items on the market now.

Well maybe for poor family who wants to their child to be a stage actor playing Hamlet. Then again, Hamlet is free and can be borrowed from state Library (if they have it).

*
Yes, use a 4 century old piece of work to reinforce your point that pirates only will steal something current... I wonder what else did the literary industry produce in that 400 years? Let's not look that far back shall we? Still strong as ever eh?

Kidicarus
post Aug 27 2009, 11:46 AM

Enthusiast
Group Icon
VIP
727 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


QUOTE(zioburosky13 @ Aug 26 2009, 10:04 PM)
No one would want to pirate Shakespeare's work for it's not the hottest items on the market now.

Well maybe for poor family who wants to their child to be a stage actor playing Hamlet. Then again, Hamlet is free and can be borrowed from state Library (if they have it).
*
You can't pirate Shakepeare's work for the following reasons:
His works predate copyright law.
If modern copyright law were to applied, the copyright expires upon 50-75 years after the death of the author.

Yes, there should be more properly stocked libraries funded by the state.

Starcraft will be an commercial success whether people boycott it/pirate it. Activision/blizzard is not really bothered about your cash (thanks to WoW) as you can tell from it's delayed release date. Only you (not you specifically) will lose out if you decide to pirate it/boycott it.
SUSf4tE
post Aug 27 2009, 12:28 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,605 posts

Joined: Nov 2008

Y suddenly talk about shakespear pula.. lets go back to starcraft 2.. piracy problem is for blizzard to handle.. we enjoy the game smile.gif
fujkenasai
post Aug 27 2009, 12:42 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,137 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(f4tE @ Aug 27 2009, 12:28 PM)
Y suddenly talk about shakespear pula.. lets go back to starcraft 2.. piracy problem is for blizzard to handle.. we enjoy the game smile.gif
*
Cos he is making a cameo in SCr. rclxms.gif rclxms.gif
zioburosky13
post Aug 27 2009, 11:29 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
554 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(H@H@ @ Aug 27 2009, 10:04 AM)
Yes, use a 4 century old piece of work to reinforce your point that pirates only will steal something current... I wonder what else did the literary industry produce in that 400 years? Let's not look that far back shall we? Still strong as ever eh?
*
Paper and literature were consider only for the rich people in Shakespeare's time. So if the common wants to read it, they have to resolve to piracy for cheep print.
Well that's history now.

What they need in Starcraft 2: combat formation. Like Age of Empire series.

This post has been edited by zioburosky13: Aug 27 2009, 11:29 PM
bobohead1988
post Aug 27 2009, 11:36 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
852 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Sungai-Takda-Ara


Why the hell are you people talking Shakespeare in a games forum?
zioburosky13
post Aug 28 2009, 08:10 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
554 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(bobohead1988 @ Aug 27 2009, 11:36 PM)
Why the hell are you people talking Shakespeare in a games forum?
*
Because the LAN thingie is getting boring and no new news coming out from Blizzard? xD

This post has been edited by zioburosky13: Aug 28 2009, 08:12 AM
fujkenasai
post Aug 28 2009, 10:42 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,137 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(zioburosky13 @ Aug 28 2009, 08:10 AM)
Because the LAN thingie is getting boring and no new news coming out from Blizzard? xD
*
Jimmy rynold's past life is acctually shakes spear and britney spears?
dfcloud
post Aug 28 2009, 05:52 PM

(屮ʘДʘ)屮
*****
Senior Member
719 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: :morF
QUOTE(bobohead1988 @ Aug 27 2009, 11:36 PM)
Why the hell are you people talking Shakespeare in a games forum?
*

killing times till the next fcking battle reports

Vorador
post Sep 2 2009, 12:34 PM

Blessed !!!
*******
Senior Member
3,494 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Nosgoth


Argh, there's a big rumour spreading around after Blizzcon'09, said that the battle.net 2.0 will require monthly payment like WoW... hm... it doesn't sounds like a good news to me, hope it remain as a rumour and never come true.
H@H@
post Sep 2 2009, 12:52 PM

I'M THE TEAMKILLING F***TARD!!!
Group Icon
VIP
6,727 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 6 feet under at Bloodgulch Outpost Alpha Number 1



Ah crap, been away for almost a week.

QUOTE(zioburosky13 @ Aug 27 2009, 11:29 PM)
Paper and literature were consider only for the rich people in Shakespeare's time. So if the common wants to read it, they have to resolve to piracy for cheep print.
Well that's history now.

What they need in Starcraft 2: combat formation. Like Age of Empire series.
*
Yes, its true that theatre and literature were for the upper class, but I'm pretty sure the middle to lower class citizens didn't resolve to piracy for "cheap print" (Since the then "Gutenberg" was still freaking expensive to use and not even in wide usage).

QUOTE(Vorador @ Sep 2 2009, 12:34 PM)
Argh, there's a big rumour spreading around after Blizzcon'09, said that the battle.net 2.0 will require monthly payment like WoW... hm... it doesn't sounds like a good news to me, hope it remain as a rumour and never come true.
*
Hmmm, if you had mentioned this 4 months ago, I would've said "UNPOSSIBLE!", but now, after the whole crap with Modern Warfare 2... I dunno...
TSCheesenium
post Sep 2 2009, 02:04 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(Vorador @ Sep 2 2009, 12:34 PM)
Argh, there's a big rumour spreading around after Blizzcon'09, said that the battle.net 2.0 will require monthly payment like WoW... hm... it doesn't sounds like a good news to me, hope it remain as a rumour and never come true.
*
It's false.

I'll dig out the post the Karune says that they wont be charging for Battlenet 2.0.
Vorador
post Sep 2 2009, 02:23 PM

Blessed !!!
*******
Senior Member
3,494 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Nosgoth


QUOTE(Cheesenium @ Sep 2 2009, 02:04 PM)
It's false.

I'll dig out the post the Karune says that they wont be charging for Battlenet 2.0.
*
Please do so! (And I will keep my plan to buy the best version of SC2 when it's out)
frags
post Sep 2 2009, 04:02 PM

The Wizard
Group Icon
VIP
1,640 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


http://hellforge.gameriot.com/blogs/Hellfo...ed-As-Reference

QUOTE
So Julian (Jay) Wilson told us that you guys are looking monetize Battle.Net in some way. Is that right?

Wow, that's an evil way of putting it. Julian's turning into a business guy on me. Here's the way I would put it. We're definitely not looking at turning Diablo into a subscription based game. It's clearly not an MMO, so it's not appropriate to do a business model like that. The way we approach all of our games now, is we come up with what we think is a great game, and then we wrap the appropriate business model around it. If that's just a box price, then that's that.

With Battle.Net we're definitely looking at possible different features that we might be able to do for additional money. We're not talking about Hellgate or anything like that. We're not going to tack things on. I think World of Warcraft is a great example to look at. We charge people if they want to switch servers or if they want name changes, things that aren't core to the game experience, they're really just optional things that some people want. It takes us some development work to do it, so it makes sense to charge for it. We would never do something like say to get the full game experience, you'll have to pay extra.




http://starcraft.incgamers.com/blog/commen...-a-possibility/
QUOTE
what I will say is that a player who goes to retail and buys the Starcraft 2 box at retail will have the full Starcraft 2 game included in the box and they will have the ability to play on battlenet with no additional fee.

radkliler
post Sep 2 2009, 10:46 PM

WUBWUBWUB
*****
Senior Member
985 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Limbo


QUOTE(ch0c0cheeze @ Sep 2 2009, 05:21 PM)
I read somewhere it says starcraft 2 and possibly future blizzard games will need to activate the game online through registering in blizzard website before you can play the game. If you dont have an internet connection then you will not be able to play the game.

Blizzard is going all out against piracy and it will be impossible for pirates to crack this game finally.
*
The harder you try to make ur game un-pirate-able, the harder the pirates will try to crack it.

Sad but true fact.
Vorador
post Sep 2 2009, 11:30 PM

Blessed !!!
*******
Senior Member
3,494 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Nosgoth


They even cracked star force, what you gonna say?

Anyway I once thinking if blizzard dare make battle.net playable only through monthly payment, I will definitely download the game instead of queue up during the launch date for a collector's edition.
H@H@
post Sep 2 2009, 11:34 PM

I'M THE TEAMKILLING F***TARD!!!
Group Icon
VIP
6,727 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 6 feet under at Bloodgulch Outpost Alpha Number 1



QUOTE(Vorador @ Sep 2 2009, 11:30 PM)
They even cracked star force, what you gonna say?

Anyway I once thinking if blizzard dare make battle.net playable only through monthly payment, I will definitely download the game instead of queue up during the launch date  for a collector's edition.
*
Do note that if they do implement a monthly subscription fee, it'll be akin to an MMO, and no MMO on earth has ever lost to piracy (Argue all you want about private servers and whatnot, but they all lack the same thing... community, updates and playerbase).

Of course that would be a ridiculously ballsy move that would probably falsify my statement above (Since the original servers wouldn't have the playerbase at all anyway)

Even the Koreans would balk at that.
H@H@
post Sep 3 2009, 11:18 AM

I'M THE TEAMKILLING F***TARD!!!
Group Icon
VIP
6,727 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 6 feet under at Bloodgulch Outpost Alpha Number 1



QUOTE(ch0c0cheeze @ Sep 3 2009, 08:37 AM)
What is starforce? Anyway, I think they have made it clear that bnet is not going to be subscription base.
*
Starforce was this infamous DRM that was used around 2003-2006 which was made by this Russian company. It was the most intrusive form of copy protection ever used since it installed various files onto your computer, had hidden call-home programs which would send your details back to their master server (Unconfirmed) and was nigh uncrackable for 2 years. This DRM scheme alone was so invasive that it did everything from corrupting Windows installations to borking hardware completely.

Anyway, like with all copy protection schemes, the idea is to simply stop day one casual pirates (The kind that buys a copy, burns it and passes it to friends), but not the hardcore ones.

That being said, Starforce did deny the pirate community Splinter Cell Chaos Theory for nearly 2 years, so that was its only victory I guess.

123 Pages « < 31 32 33 34 35 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0370sec    0.50    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 03:14 AM