Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
11 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The Official Subwoofer Thread v2, Everything you need to know about bass!

views
     
jchong
post Jul 21 2009, 09:40 PM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(aiman04 @ Jul 21 2009, 08:44 PM)
REL?
*
Nope.

QUOTE(eugenengkarmeng @ Jul 21 2009, 09:26 PM)
Aiyah this time sure kena, RBH Sound, this time can buy empat ekor oledi?
*
Sorry, not RBH either.

Like I said, lesser known brand.
jchong
post Jul 21 2009, 10:01 PM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(aiman04 @ Jul 21 2009, 09:54 PM)
Rogers?
*
Nope.

It's an American brand.
jchong
post Jul 21 2009, 11:14 PM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(bryanlee @ Jul 21 2009, 10:03 PM)
Rythmik Audio
*
Well done!

QUOTE(kianwee @ Jul 21 2009, 10:34 PM)
Rythmik Audio sealed 15" sub (F15)
*
Yes, indeed it is the F15.


Added on July 21, 2009, 11:15 pm
QUOTE(aiman04 @ Jul 21 2009, 10:45 PM)
370WRMS PEQ $899 
300WRMS $749
*
That's correct. I got the PEQ version. D2A shipping was $200.

This post has been edited by jchong: Jul 21 2009, 11:15 PM
jchong
post Jul 22 2009, 09:37 AM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(arremie @ Jul 22 2009, 12:55 AM)
dang u guys sub getting bigger n bigger sweat.gif
*
Yup, getting bigger but not too HUGE in my case. One reason why I went for sealed design is to keep the size manageable.

For the F15 size is 19" x 19" x 20", which is quite compact considering the 15" driver. By comparison the SVS PB-12NSD (which I did consider) is 18" x 21" x 25".


Added on July 22, 2009, 9:39 am
QUOTE(mys_terious @ Jul 22 2009, 12:02 AM)
last time i nearly bought the DIY but at the end bought svs.. and also saw i think ascend also selling it.. not sure stil got boh


Added on July 22, 2009, 12:05 am

bro remember to give us a review and somemore pics pls when u r free
*
Yup, Ascend started carrying the Rythmik line about Oct/Nov last year.

I'll do a review once I've set it up better.

This post has been edited by jchong: Jul 22 2009, 09:39 AM
jchong
post Jul 22 2009, 11:32 AM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(robinlim @ Jul 22 2009, 09:46 AM)
velo spl 1200 ultra
initially i wanna get the svs pb12+
and very keen on getting it
but the size of the sub taken me aback sweat.gif
since i'm placing my sub in the living room
my HM doesn't like any gigantic sub resting there

if i were to have a dedicated HT room
will definitely get svs sub smile.gif
*
Congrats on the Velo! Looks like both of us managed to get what we wanted to get smile.gif
jchong
post Jul 22 2009, 07:54 PM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(mys_terious @ Jul 22 2009, 12:46 PM)
bro just curious and kehpoh abit,  hows the warranty like for rythmik.. i mean do they cover shipping if there is a faulty part?
*
Warranty is 5 years for the driver, 2 years for electronics (amp). Hmm... didn't ask about the shipping for replacement parts. Will go and find out.
jchong
post Jul 22 2009, 11:01 PM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
Preliminary look at the Rythmik F15

Thanks to some test tones and a SPL meter borrowed from a forummer (you know who you are notworthy.gif) I managed to chart the in-room freq response of the F15 vs the CHT-12Q.

user posted image

As you can see the F15 digs down to 10Hz in-room!! And it's fairly flat from 10-32Hz. By comparison the 12Q falls off rapidly below 32Hz and is basically inaudible from 25Hz and below.

So what does 10Hz sound like? Well I can't hear it. I can only start hearing some pulsations about 14Hz upwards (and this is probably due to the vibration of things in the room rather than the test signal itself). And at the test level of 80+ dB it's not powerful enough to really rattle the room. I've not tried pushing it higher yet.

Playing back a few scenes from Kung Fu Panda, the F15 is certainly tighter than the 12Q. It doesn't rumble as much. On the 'skidoosh' scene the explosion is more palpable and I can hear the bass textures as the explosion ripples across the screen (on the 12Q the bass was less defined). Yet, strangely on some scenes like when Tai Lung falls from the sky the rumbly nature of the 12Q seems to add more punch. Need to do more tweaking, especially how to use the parametric EQ on the F15.
jchong
post Jul 23 2009, 09:11 AM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(mys_terious @ Jul 23 2009, 01:10 AM)
just curious how far was the mic away from the sub..
*
The meter was about 3.1m away from the sub.

QUOTE(pierreye @ Jul 23 2009, 07:38 AM)
Did u cut your sub at 50hz? Also, can you try to increase the volume and see what's the highest SPL you can reach? If you can get +-3db at 105db from 20hz to 80hz that this is monster sub.
*
No, didn't cut it at 50Hz. The roll off must be due to the room I think (some nulls or holes). Now got to find way to correct for the room acoustics to balance out the area from 45-80Hz.

I'll push the sub more later once it's broken in.

QUOTE(anfieldude @ Jul 23 2009, 08:26 AM)
Bro,
You might need to get the correction curves for the Galaxy-CM140 and apply to this if you have not done it. Let me know if you need it I will send it to you. Or you can download it from REW website. Why not use the REW? It is automated and sweeps the curve. All you need to do is click after setting up.
*
Yup, I'll need to factor in the correction next. I did download the CM-140 cal file from REW.

As for REW I was itching to use it but realised I don't have everything yet, e.g. some of the cables. Particularly, I saw the note about not using the mic-in on the notebook, so it seems I might need to buy an external usb sound card too? When you used REW did you plug straight into the notebook or used an external sound card?
jchong
post Jul 23 2009, 09:54 AM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(htkaki @ Jul 23 2009, 09:21 AM)
Lazy to do it. Here's the info :

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Can't compare between the SVS graph and mine since mine is in-room, whereas the SVS is probably ground plane. The test conditions are totally different.

Anyway, doing an in-room test is quite illuminating since it reveals how your room interacts with the sub. The effect of room gain and peaks and nulls will also become apparent.
jchong
post Jul 23 2009, 10:47 AM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(anfieldude @ Jul 23 2009, 10:16 AM)
I believe there is a cutoff here. Something does not look quite right after 50Hz. Normally the rolloff is above 100Hz at worst. Most of the rolloffs are about 150Hz. Check to see if there is a cutoff somewhere.  Since both your subs are behaving the same, the cutoff is probably at the amp.
*
If there is a cutoff, what is doing the cutoff? As you said the freq chart from 50-101Hz is about the same for the F15 and 12Q so it can't be anything on the subs right?

In my Onkyo 876 the LFE is set to 100Hz. Note: the freq test was done with all EQ off so Audyssey was not in effect.

jchong
post Jul 23 2009, 10:50 AM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(pierreye @ Jul 23 2009, 10:07 AM)
If you don't cut it, then it's weird it roll off quite drastic after 50hz. Normally peak and valley due to room interaction you should have several peak and valley but never roll off in your graph. The roll off is almost 20db which is too much. Even an equalizer can't help you much here if the drop off is too much. You can try some bass trap here.
*
Yeah, I know it's quite weird. Scratching my head how to counter it because like you said even equalizer might not be enough since the drop is so much.

As for bass trap, that only helps to reduce peaks right? Can it help to boost up valleys?
jchong
post Jul 23 2009, 02:09 PM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(pierreye @ Jul 23 2009, 01:06 PM)
Bass trap is to smooth down the valley and peak. It don't actually boost up valley as it only help to reduce the interaction of the wave so you have less cancellation. Did you cut your front speaker at 50hz? Normally test tone I feed through the L/R input of the receiver so that I can see how the speaker interact with my sub.
*
I cut the front speakers at 40 Hz.

My test tones are mp3 files. I played through the PS3, which is connected to AVR via HDMI. If I play the test tone I think it will be output via all speakers. So to test the sub, I unplugged all the other speakers. I did also test just the front speakers only (the rest unplugged) but haven't charted it yet.
jchong
post Jul 23 2009, 03:09 PM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(ycs @ Jul 23 2009, 02:51 PM)
Isn't that the reason for the roll-off at 50Hz for your sub? I set my 805 at 100Hz for front speakers.

Btw, the LPE setting you referered to earlier is meant for the .1 channel only.
*
Shouldn't be. If I cut the front speakers at 40Hz, it means freq lower than 40Hz are not sent to front speakers right? Should have no effect on the sub.

Sub as you said is controlled by the LFE setting, which I set at 100Hz.
jchong
post Jul 23 2009, 03:59 PM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE
Yes, the front speakers don't receive below 40Hz and instead it goes to the subĀ  i.e. 0-40Hz goes to the sub


Does it work that way? i.e. setting front to 40Hz means only 0-40Hz goes to the sub? I thought the sub is governed only by the LFE setting.

anfieldude, you have the 876 also, does setting the front to 40Hz means only 0-40Hz goes to the sub?

QUOTE
Your're playing an mp3 which does not have the .1 channel so there's nothing for the sub to play.


Yes, the MP3 doesn't have a .1 channel or any multichannel info, so the AVR outputs the same signal equally to all speakers incl the sub. When I play the test tones to only the sub I can hear the signals from 45-101Hz (though at different loudness).

QUOTE
Looks like this is what is happening. Better to use a signal generator (PC has some apps) and hook up the line out from ur PC and split into the CD input of the AVR. Or use the REW.


Yup planning to do that next. One thing, it is only a stereo line out to the AVR's CD input. In this case will the 876 output this signal to the sub? What mode do I have to set the 876 to in order for it to output to the sub? Otherwise I'm afraid stereo line out means going to the front speakers only.

QUOTE
Cut-off at 40Hz, do your fronts go so low? Any reason why the cutoff is set at 40Hz


Actually Audyssey even set my fronts to full band, but I changed to 40Hz. Current using PSB T55 which -3dB freq response is spec'd at 32Hz. That's why I set to 40Hz. Is there any difference if I set it higher than 40?

This post has been edited by jchong: Jul 23 2009, 04:01 PM
jchong
post Jul 23 2009, 10:35 PM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
You guys are right. thumbup.gif

When I changed the fronts to 80 Hz I do get more output from the sub. However, the peaks and valleys are still in the same places, so those are probably due to the room.

Note: in the chart below, the correction factors for CM-140 have been applied.

Attached Image

This post has been edited by jchong: Jul 24 2009, 09:35 AM
jchong
post Jul 24 2009, 09:54 AM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(pierreye @ Jul 24 2009, 09:26 AM)
Good. Can you try to increase loudness and play the testtone at 20hz? I want to see how loud can this sub go. If you can reach 105db, then at USD 1k + 25% tax (less than RM 5k) is a good buy.
*
Don't know if I want to push the sub to its limits smile.gif

Anyway, at Home Theater Shack the 12" Rythmik was tested (ground plane, 2m) and at 20Hz it produced 94.4 dB. See here: http://www.hometheatershack.com/forums/sub...nformation.html

The 15" Rythmik is supposed to have 3-4 dB more output than the 12". But even so, it would not reach 105 dB @ 20Hz.

This post has been edited by jchong: Jul 24 2009, 09:58 AM
jchong
post Jul 24 2009, 11:24 AM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(pierreye @ Jul 24 2009, 10:42 AM)
You will see that the db do not increase even if you increase the volume. But normally at this level the distortion is quite high. What does it mean if it can't hit 105db? Nothing unless you listen at reference level. That means your sub can't produce the dynamic sound of the movie. Eg, if you normally listen at 85db, and your sub can play up to 100db, you'll have 15db headroom. Normally movie or ochestra have a dynamic range of +-20db, meaning at the most dynamic scene or sound, your sub will not reach the max.
*
I agree that more bass headroom is best. But any reason why focus only on 20Hz? In a big bass heavy scene the peak might not be at 20Hz, it might be maybe 30-50Hz.
jchong
post Jul 25 2009, 09:03 PM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
After playing around with some more settings and doing more listening I think I know what is happening. With the CHT-12Q I found out that it doesn't generate significant bass energy below 28Hz in my room (it falls off very rapidly). See the graph I posted earlier. As a result to get the punch I want, I was turning up the gain on it.

Previously, I used the skidoosh scene on KFP as a reference for spl and the 12Q hit about 98-99dB. But much of this I suspect comes from 30-50Hz region on the 12Q since there's far less pressure from 28Hz and below.

Compare this to the F15 which is fairly flat to 16Hz in my room and still has some output down to 10Hz. Going back to the skidoosh scene, if the F15 hits 100dB on this scene the spl is coming not only from the 30-50Hz region but also from below that as well. In other words, the make up of the 100dB from the F15 is different from that of the 12Q. The 12Q is running quite a bit hotter than the F15 in order to make up for the lesser energy below 30Hz.

So really in other scenes I wasn't getting that punch from the F15 because the level knob was lower than the 12Q (and also I imagine the bass spectrum for other scenes is different). I just had to increase the sub trim in the AVR and the F15 would shine! This also meant that the skidoosh scene would now sound truly monstrous! So much so that too many things in my room rattle now. To tame the vibrations in my room for the skidoosh scene I had to set the F15 to 28/Hi damping.

Anyway, I now know that the F15 can generate much more bass energy (especially down below) compared to the CHT-12Q. Just watched Valkyrie today and it had some very good bass moments.

Also, I moved my sub around and found that middle of the room produced a smoother response than left/right side. Also ran Audyssey after that and the comparison chart is below:

user posted image
jchong
post Jul 26 2009, 11:50 AM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
Heard that SVS will be coming out with 2 new sealed subs later this year. One 13", another 16"!
jchong
post Aug 23 2009, 09:24 AM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(ronnt88 @ Aug 21 2009, 07:54 PM)
guys, where can i go in KL to audition really good subs which are available here.. thinking of upgrading & the spl 1200 ultra & svspc12+ r in my mind now. Don't wanna spend more than this d smile.gif

Where is A&L? Think they'll have 1200ultra for audition?
*
You can check their website for branch locations: http://www.alaudio.com.my/

I think some of the branches would have the SPL1200 for demo. I've seen one in the Amcorp Mall branch. Give them a call to confirm.

11 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0518sec    0.67    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 07:06 AM