Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
120 Pages « < 96 97 98 99 100 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The Official Subwoofer Thread v2, Everything you need to know about bass!

views
     
yonggoh
post Oct 8 2009, 10:48 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,314 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Kuching, Sarawak


QUOTE(logit85 @ Oct 7 2009, 11:34 PM)
Elemental Designs yestaday i chat about LFE he said If you send Left Channel information, and some receivers do have .2 for subwoofers allowing you to have a left and a right then yes you can send left channel information only to the LFE input on the subwoofer

Why LFE dont have Right channel i realy need it
i know LFE left channel only but can't get right channel
but got RCA input left channel and right channel but problem Crossover will cut hz
if use LFE we can disable Crossover but if use RCA still enable Crossover we can't disable Crossover
sad  cry.gif
*
get one of these Y-Splitter things:

http://ep.yimg.com/ca/I/abccables-store_2073_95948096

Receiver[single output]-->[single]Sub Cable[single]-->[single]Y-Splitter[dual]--->[dual input]Sub

smile.gif
mpyw
post Oct 8 2009, 11:59 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,603 posts

Joined: Feb 2007


user posted image

Paradigm SUB 1 and SUB 2 subwoofers -- six drivers on three sides for buzz-free bass

by Steven Kim posted Oct 2nd 2009 at 1:16PM

Paradigm doesn't move models in and out of its Reference Signature lineup very often, and the SUB 25 was introduced less than a year ago. Progress never stops, though, and the SUB 25 has been displaced as top dog by the SUB 2 and its "little" brother SUB 1. These new designs feature six drivers (10-inches in the SUB 2, 8-inches for the SUB 1) arranged in three radially symmetric stacked pairs -- the end result being a lot of effective radiating area with in-cabinet forces that balance each other out. In the real world, that means more boom and less buzz, especially with the kilowatt range Class D amps Paradigm includes in these subs. Yeah, we want one too, but even with just six drivers this isn't going to come cheap. The $3,500 price tag on the SUB 1 is comparable to the outgoing SUB 25, but the SUB 2 will sink your wallet to a $7,500 crush depth. Pick yourself up off the floor and read the full release after the break if you're interested.

thumbup.gif thumbup.gif


SUSlogit85
post Oct 8 2009, 12:03 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,814 posts

Joined: Dec 2008



QUOTE(yonggoh @ Oct 8 2009, 10:48 AM)
get one of these Y-Splitter things:

http://ep.yimg.com/ca/I/abccables-store_2073_95948096

Receiver[single output]-->[single]Sub Cable[single]-->[single]Y-Splitter[dual]--->[dual input]Sub

smile.gif
*
i know Receiver can get LFE two output like two port will logo like (L) ( R ) so will support LFE Left channel and Right Channel right correct ??

This post has been edited by logit85: Oct 8 2009, 12:03 PM
SUSHornyAngMoh
post Oct 8 2009, 12:07 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
801 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(mpyw @ Oct 8 2009, 11:59 AM)
user posted image

Paradigm SUB 1 and SUB 2 subwoofers -- six drivers on three sides for buzz-free bass

by Steven Kim posted Oct 2nd 2009 at 1:16PM

Paradigm doesn't move models in and out of its Reference Signature lineup very often, and the SUB 25 was introduced less than a year ago. Progress never stops, though, and the SUB 25 has been displaced as top dog by the SUB 2 and its "little" brother SUB 1. These new designs feature six drivers (10-inches in the SUB 2, 8-inches for the SUB 1) arranged in three radially symmetric stacked pairs -- the end result being a lot of effective radiating area with in-cabinet forces that balance each other out. In the real world, that means more boom and less buzz, especially with the kilowatt range Class D amps Paradigm includes in these subs. Yeah, we want one too, but even with just six drivers this isn't going to come cheap. The $3,500 price tag on the SUB 1 is comparable to the outgoing SUB 25, but the SUB 2 will sink your wallet to a $7,500 crush depth. Pick yourself up off the floor and read the full release after the break if you're interested.

thumbup.gif  thumbup.gif
*
Oh YES! I am very very interested! drool.gif drool.gif But wallet very thin so can only dream loh! sad.gif
BTW tq very much for this info...........I will have Bass dreams against. thumbup.gif
yonggoh
post Oct 8 2009, 12:55 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,314 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Kuching, Sarawak


QUOTE(logit85 @ Oct 8 2009, 12:03 PM)
i know Receiver can get LFE two output like two port will logo like (L) ( R ) so will support LFE Left channel and Right Channel right correct ??
*
perhaps... but two two receivers that i have only have one output for LFE... they may be other receivers that output two channels for LFE but since that don't apply to me i have not researched about that issue... perhaps someone can shed more light on this...
htkaki
post Oct 8 2009, 07:42 PM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



QUOTE(mpyw @ Oct 8 2009, 11:59 AM)

Paradigm SUB 1 and SUB 2 subwoofers -- six drivers on three sides for buzz-free bass

by Steven Kim posted Oct 2nd 2009 at 1:16PM

Paradigm doesn't move models in and out of its Reference Signature lineup very often, and the SUB 25 was introduced less than a year ago. Progress never stops, though, and the SUB 25 has been displaced as top dog by the SUB 2 and its "little" brother SUB 1. These new designs feature six drivers (10-inches in the SUB 2, 8-inches for the SUB 1) arranged in three radially symmetric stacked pairs -- the end result being a lot of effective radiating area with in-cabinet forces that balance each other out. In the real world, that means more boom and less buzz, especially with the kilowatt range Class D amps Paradigm includes in these subs. Yeah, we want one too, but even with just six drivers this isn't going to come cheap. The $3,500 price tag on the SUB 1 is comparable to the outgoing SUB 25, but the SUB 2 will sink your wallet to a $7,500 crush depth. Pick yourself up off the floor and read the full release after the break if you're interested.

thumbup.gif  thumbup.gif
shocking.gif sweat.gif
ar188
post Oct 8 2009, 07:50 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(htkaki @ Oct 8 2009, 07:42 PM)
shocking.gif  sweat.gif
*
will it sound better than 2 PB13ultra + EQ1 ? biggrin.gif
htkaki
post Oct 8 2009, 07:59 PM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



QUOTE(ar188 @ Oct 8 2009, 07:50 PM)
will it sound better than 2 PB13ultra + EQ1 ?  biggrin.gif
*
That I am not sure and probably yes as EQ1 able to do a proper room correction since it does not mention that the PSB comes with any EQ or room correction device. But on SPL output, I put my money on PB13-Ultra rolleyes.gif
gnsumas
post Oct 8 2009, 08:13 PM

/k/+ps=WIN!
*****
Senior Member
736 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Hell



QUOTE(htkaki @ Oct 8 2009, 07:59 PM)
That I am not sure and probably yes as EQ1 able to do a proper room correction since it does not mention that the PSB comes with any EQ or room correction device. But on SPL output, I put my money on PB13-Ultra  rolleyes.gif
*
htkaki nie cakap jujur ke kerana diorang nie jual svs? rolleyes.gif
htkaki
post Oct 8 2009, 10:53 PM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



Take a look at 13-Ultra performance :

http://www.hometheatershack.com/forums/sub...ompilation.html
gnsumas
post Oct 9 2009, 12:39 AM

/k/+ps=WIN!
*****
Senior Member
736 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Hell



aiya...

taupun....

tadi berjokin aje tongue.gif
ar188
post Oct 9 2009, 12:49 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(htkaki @ Oct 8 2009, 10:53 PM)
from 12-30hz, svs tapau f113 also.. biggrin.gif
mpyw
post Oct 9 2009, 08:20 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,603 posts

Joined: Feb 2007


Tested "Incredible Hulk" last night on the field fight scene....

Vol at -16, sub level at 10 o'clock at -6.5db at AVR, running on 16Hz mode on the SVS PC12+

I am trying to avoid the metal shield waving by the Hulk sweat.gif
and the pressure generate by the sound wave from the 2 army truck....I can feel the pressure....and can feel every steps of the Hulk...earth shaking type....

previously can only hear the stomping foot sound, but I can feel now....

Totally new experience thumbup.gif
SUSHornyAngMoh
post Oct 9 2009, 08:57 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
801 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(mpyw @ Oct 9 2009, 08:20 AM)
Tested "Incredible Hulk" last night on the field fight scene....

Vol at -16, sub level at 10 o'clock at -6.5db at AVR, running on 16Hz mode on the SVS PC12+

I am trying to avoid the metal shield waving by the Hulk sweat.gif
and the pressure generate by the sound wave from the 2 army truck....I can feel the pressure....and can feel every steps of the Hulk...earth shaking type....

previously can only hear the stomping foot sound, but I can feel now....

Totally new experience thumbup.gif
*
See! Now u get to really enjoy Bulu ray! Investment in a good subby is most rewarding! thumbup.gif Just imagine how it would be like if u have invested in TWO SVS PB-13U! brows.gif
mpyw
post Oct 9 2009, 09:38 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,603 posts

Joined: Feb 2007


Something new on "tightness" & "Flabby" view....what's your take?

http://www.axiomaudio.com/tightbass.html

QUOTE
“Tight” or “Flabby” Bass: Does It Exist?

Regular readers of loudspeaker and subwoofer reviews both online and in hi-fi/video magazines are used to seeing references to the sound quality of deep bass reproduction. Adjectives such as “tight” and “flabby” or “loose” are tossed around by reviewers in quite casual fashion, as if it’s a given that subwoofers or large loudspeakers have inherent traits of “tightness” or “flabbiness” based on their design. Indeed, it’s almost become a cliché that sealed subwoofers yield “tighter” more “musical” deep bass than ported or vented subs. I’m here to politely disagree and suggest, perhaps strongly, that much of that talk of “tight” or “flabby” bass is a lot of anecdotal hot air.

Assuming competently designed subwoofers (not white van “one-note subs”), I believe that all such impressions of "tight" or "flabby" bass are almost entirely the product of crossover points, room placement, listener location and room standing waves and room modes -- plus the listener's active imagination. Added to this are the casual listening comparisons made of subwoofers, with no scientific controls in place. It hasn't helped that a lot of subjective reviewers in certain magazines and web sites talk about this without understanding the fundamentals of bass frequencies and room effects, or how to do careful appraisals of subwoofers. Moreover, deep bass is not intrinsically "tight." The wavelengths are long and quite slow compared to midrange and high frequencies. In fact, the woofer cone movement is very slow compared to upper bass and higher frequencies.

But don't take my word for it - you can prove it for yourself. Try playing only your subwoofer with no accompanying upper bass and midrange frequencies. Turn off all the speakers except the sub. There's nothing "tight" or musical sounding about what issues from the subwoofer -- unless of course the crossover is not engaged or there isn't a steep enough roll-off.

That’s because the midrange and upper bass transients supply the “tightness”--the initial plucking of a stand-up bass string, for example. The "pluck" or snap of the string is hundreds of Hz higher than the fundamental energy, which is often in the region of 30 Hz to 100 Hz. Similarly, the initial “thwack” of an orchestral bass drum is in the lower midrange; so are the sounds of the percussionist’s mallets connecting with the stretched diaphragm of tympani drums.

Another experiment you can do to understand the natural reverberance of bass is to actually try hearing a plucked or bowed double-bass viol or cello, or even an electric bass guitar, in your own room. Some reviewers I've read seem never to have had this experience. I have had the good fortune to experience it first hand: my mother led a small chamber orchestra that practiced in the music room of the house I grew up in and that included a big double bass and a cello. A good friend of mine in Toronto is a professional double bassist, and when you hear that bass plucked or bowed in a domestic room, the whole room--the entire house-- is suffused with bass; it lingers and reverberates. It's wonderful and astonishingly powerful. So is a real cello played in the confines of a typical living room. Words like "tightness" or "flabbiness" simply don't apply.

Try and think of subwoofers simply as low-frequency air pumps, supplying the long wavelengths of the deepest bass fundamental tones. You simply want enough power to move enough air--to fill a particular room at a level that yields a plausible illusion of the real instruments, so choose the appropriate sub that will do that, and use excellent satellite speakers, such as the M80s, M60s or even good bookshelf models like the M22s, M3s and M2s to supply the elusive “tightness” that audiophiles seem to believe exists. As long as the satellite speakers, whether floor-standing or compact bookshelf models, have smooth midrange and reasonably linear upper bass response to 100 Hz, then they’ll generate all the tightness that’s present. Of course a very powerful amp capable of properly reproducing these upper bass peaks will also add dramatically to the experience.

For example, there is nothing "musical" or "unmusical" about the EP175, the EP350, EP400, EP500, or EP600. The "tight" musical qualities are supplied by the M80s or M60s; the subs just pump out the low-frequency energy. If you place the subwoofer with reasonable care, and match them well in terms of the crossover with your main speakers, any of them will supply the "tightness" and "snap" that you're searching for.

Sensing that I might be pilloried by some high-end reviewers for challenging the dearly held notions of tight or loose bass, I asked several of my Axiom colleagues, for their engineering comments. While acknowledging and endorsing my analysis, they commented:

(Tom Cumberland, electrical engineer): “If there is ‘tightness’ to subwoofers, it applies to the driver and amplifier combination. If the woofer is not well-controlled, it could be categorized as ‘loose.’ Since at Axiom we design and manufacture both our own amplifiers and our own woofers we have total control over all the variables."

(Ian Colquhoun, chief designer and president of Axiom): “The reality is that a lot of the impression of tightness from a subwoofer is just in the crossover roll-off. If you have an adjustable crossover on your sub you can do this experiment by comparing the lowest crossover setting to the highest and see the impression of “tightness” go up with the frequency setting. Because of this phenomenon, an EP175 can, on its own, sound so-called “tighter” than an EP600, but this is because it does not have the sophisticated crossover that is in an EP600. Consequently the EP175 is playing (at a lower levels, mind you) those mid-bass frequencies that contribute to so-called impressions of "tightness." The EP600, on the other hand, has a brick-wall filter that does not allow any mid-bass frequencies to emanate from the subwoofer. If you really want “tight” bass, then you need to concentrate on the main speakers and amplifier combination because that is where those mid-bass frequencies are and should be generated. An A1400 amplifier and a pair of M80s will deliver the tightness you are looking for.”

htkaki
post Oct 9 2009, 09:40 AM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



QUOTE(mpyw @ Oct 9 2009, 08:20 AM)
Tested "Incredible Hulk" last night on the field fight scene....

Vol at -16, sub level at 10 o'clock at -6.5db at AVR, running on 16Hz mode on the SVS PC12+

I am trying to avoid the metal shield waving by the Hulk sweat.gif
and the pressure generate by the sound wave from the 2 army truck....I can feel the pressure....and can feel every steps of the Hulk...earth shaking type....

previously can only hear the stomping foot sound, but I can feel now....

Totally new experience thumbup.gif
*
Syiok eh? whistling.gif

Yes, it was a whole experience for me too. Even the entry level 12-NSD can give convincingly good bass note and feel albeit aint as powerful as 12-Plus.

I will try to configure my PB13-U to go 10Hz and feel how massive is the pressure. Will be setting up the monster tonight.
JiauBoy
post Oct 9 2009, 12:26 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
727 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: KL
eee how to read?
ronnt88
post Oct 9 2009, 12:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,353 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: D'Pearl of d'Orient


QUOTE(mpyw @ Oct 9 2009, 08:20 AM)
Tested "Incredible Hulk" last night on the field fight scene....

Vol at -16, sub level at 10 o'clock at -6.5db at AVR, running on 16Hz mode on the SVS PC12+

I am trying to avoid the metal shield waving by the Hulk sweat.gif
and the pressure generate by the sound wave from the 2 army truck....I can feel the pressure....and can feel every steps of the Hulk...earth shaking type....

previously can only hear the stomping foot sound, but I can feel now....

Totally new experience thumbup.gif
*
WOW!! So syiok!! rclxms.gif


JiauBoy
post Oct 9 2009, 01:10 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
727 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: KL
QUOTE(htkaki @ Oct 9 2009, 09:40 AM)
Syiok eh? whistling.gif

Yes, it was a whole experience for me too.  Even the entry level 12-NSD can give convincingly good bass note and feel albeit aint as powerful as 12-Plus.

I will try to configure my PB13-U to go 10Hz and feel how massive is the pressure. Will be setting up the monster tonight.
*
ya 12-NSD is entry sad.gif

jchong
post Oct 9 2009, 01:37 PM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(mpyw @ Oct 9 2009, 09:38 AM)
Something new on "tightness" & "Flabby" view....what's your take?

http://www.axiomaudio.com/tightbass.html

Assuming competently designed subwoofers (not white van “one-note subs”), I believe that all such impressions of "tight" or "flabby" bass are almost entirely the product of crossover points, room placement, listener location and room standing waves and room modes -- plus the listener's active imagination.

*
I would agree with the bold part and I think those points contribute a lot to tightness, boominess and flabbiness.

However, there is one other factor not mentioned in Axiom's article and this directly relates to the sub, not the room or cross over points or placement. It's about the sub's group delay. I don't fully understand the subject but here's an article about it: http://www.adireaudio.com/Files/GroupDelay.pdf

See also these 2 threads:

http://www.avforums.com/forums/subwoofers-...ofer-types.html
http://www.avforums.com/forums/subwoofers-...asurements.html

Some relevant excerpts from there:

The qualities are exactly the same, because accurate reproduction of the original signal is required for satisfying reproduction of both program types; All subs should offer low distortion, high dynamic headroom, wide bandwidth (at both frequency extremes) and finally, low group delay which is basically a smooth phase response. Nail all of those and you have an 'uber' sub.

However, perfection costs and so, inevitably, one or more of those performance boxes may go un-ticked, especially once a 'domestic' size restriction is added to the equation.

The movie compromise will typically favour low frequency grunt and big dynamics and worry less about upper frequency cleanliness and low group delay. The movie sub will tend to be a large ported box, with a large driver and with a fair bit of power on tap.

Music will tend to miss the last half octave less and typically isn't played at the same volume as movies, so hides a lack power in a more flattering way. It also really needs clean upper bass to blend with the main speakers and the snappy timing delivered by a low group delay. The music sub will tend to be a smaller sealed box, sporting a moderately sized driver and moderate power.

The best sub is probably a very large sealed sub with a large driver(s) and oodles of power. They exist and they are expensive.


--------------------

The measured response of a subwoofer's phase is it's Group Delay and for all the things some so called 'musical' subs do wrong, they almost universally have a low group delay, or at least as importantly, they have a very smoothly changing Group Delay.

Unfortunately, this is not a trait the SVS PB12/plus has. It has a steeply rising group delay that actually exceeds 1 cycle (360deg!) of phase beneath 25Hz. If that wont make your kick drums sound like they're lagging, I don't know what will. You know where to look to see the evidence.

In the 'One Sub v Two' thread, the PB12/U bested my humble Monolith in all film related qualities, but with music, it singularly failed to rock my boat, for exactly this reason - it just didn't have the rhythmic drive. The PB13/U is a significant step forward in this regard and I don't think it's a coincidence that it has a very flat response and a low smoothly rising group delay, particularly in the universally preferred 15Hz tune.


120 Pages « < 96 97 98 99 100 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.2926sec    0.33    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 04:06 AM