QUOTE(KTCY @ Jun 30 2009, 12:22 AM)
D90 noise control better than d300, IMHO
oh? really meh? i try both and feel almost the same =.='' hardly can see i think..Photography Nikon D40/D40x/D60/D5000 V5, Best entry level DSLR from Nikon
|
|
 Jun 30 2009, 03:03 AM
|
 
Senior Member
2,849 posts Joined: Aug 2005  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Jun 30 2009, 03:09 AM
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(mememe12 @ Jun 30 2009, 03:03 AM) oh? really meh? i try both and feel almost the same =.='' hardly can see i think.. Try under low light ? |
|
|
Jun 30 2009, 07:25 AM
|
Senior Member
4,016 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing 
|
picture output can easily say d90 has the same output as d300's.
main difference - price around rm1.6k difference - d300 got weather sealed magnesium alloy body - d300 physically bigger & better grip and d90 smaller/lighter http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d90.htm |
|
|
Jun 30 2009, 07:45 AM
|
Senior Member
3,615 posts Joined: Feb 2007
|
QUOTE(alpha_company @ Jun 30 2009, 01:57 AM) though 10mp 40D will have a wider view than 12mp d90 at the same focal length because of the 40d's lower resolution.. The focal length multiplier has nothing to do with resolution, it depends on the image sensor size. The smaller the sensor size, the bigger the focal length multiplier. If it depended on resolution then you can go and change settings on your D90/40D to a lower resolution and get free wide angle lenses  |
|
|
Jun 30 2009, 08:24 AM
|
|
Senior Member
4,016 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing
|
well.. yeah myb im wrong about that..dont know about that but saw comparisons and the 40D pics is a bit wider..
at the same distance, the kit 40D 18-55 IS also proves to get much wider pics than 18-105VR because shorter mfd. nice if i could have 1685VR.. This post has been edited by alpha_company: Jun 30 2009, 08:25 AM |
|
|
Jun 30 2009, 09:09 AM
|
Senior Member
2,586 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: got la sumwhere
|
QUOTE(alpha_company @ Jun 30 2009, 08:24 AM) well.. yeah myb im wrong about that..dont know about that but saw comparisons and the 40D pics is a bit wider.. Aik? 18mm for both bodies and Canon gets a wider shot? Doesn't make sense la bro, 40D crop factor 1.6x and D90 1.5x, shouldn't D90 be tad bit wider?at the same distance, the kit 40D 18-55 IS also proves to get much wider pics than 18-105VR because shorter mfd. nice if i could have 1685VR.. 1685VR vignetting, CA, plus pricey... |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 30 2009, 09:39 AM
|
|
Senior Member
4,016 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing
|
maybe the pic was taken at diff positions la kot..and not at the same.
Added on June 30, 2009, 9:40 amthen what lens do u suggest? 70-200VR? This post has been edited by alpha_company: Jun 30 2009, 09:40 AM |
|
|
Jun 30 2009, 10:02 AM
|
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Nov 2005
|
70-200 IS USM or 70-200VR ?
|
|
|
Jun 30 2009, 10:05 AM
|
|
Senior Member
2,586 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: got la sumwhere
|
The Nikkor 70-200 2.8 VR is an awesome lens no doubt. Optics, speed, performance, build. U should get it if u got the chance. Definitely not for poor mortals like me who can't afford the price tag
 . |
|
|
Jun 30 2009, 10:15 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Nov 2005
|
70-200VR f2.8 is indeed a great lens. Anyway... optically... the 70-210 f4-5.6 isn't that far behind for a fraction of the cost.
QUOTE(pleasuresaurus @ Jun 30 2009, 10:05 AM) The Nikkor 70-200 2.8 VR is an awesome lens no doubt. Optics, speed, performance, build. U should get it if u got the chance. Definitely not for poor mortals like me who can't afford the price tag . |
|
|
Jun 30 2009, 10:47 AM
|
|
Senior Member
2,586 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: got la sumwhere
|
I got my hands on a Siggy 50-150 2.8 awhile ago, pretty good so far. Doesn't have the same range as 70-200, no VR, but pic quality is good and it weighs less than half of the 70-200. Costs less than half too
|
|
|
Jun 30 2009, 12:11 PM
|
Senior Member
3,997 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Why So Serious?
|
QUOTE(project-o @ Jun 30 2009, 10:15 AM) 70-200VR f2.8 is indeed a great lens. Anyway... optically... the 70-210 f4-5.6 isn't that far behind for a fraction of the cost. How does the 70-210 fare in your opinion? I have one but seldom use it. |
|
|
Jun 30 2009, 12:13 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Nov 2005
|
Pretty good...... but have to get it cleaned from fungus then only can really test it out. The push-pull zoom does need some getting used to.
QUOTE(aaron1kee @ Jun 30 2009, 12:11 PM) How does the 70-210 fare in your opinion? I have one but seldom use it. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 30 2009, 12:37 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,586 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: got la sumwhere
|
QUOTE(aaron1kee @ Jun 30 2009, 12:11 PM) How does the 70-210 fare in your opinion? I have one but seldom use it. Thats a pretty old skool lens bro, u inherited it from parents or elder siblings? |
|
|
Jun 30 2009, 12:53 PM
|
Senior Member
5,515 posts Joined: Jan 2006
|
QUOTE(pleasuresaurus @ Jun 30 2009, 12:37 PM) Thats a pretty old skool lens bro, u inherited it from parents or elder siblings? my dad got one... used to use it with his FM2  |
|
|
Jun 30 2009, 01:04 PM
|
Senior Member
2,955 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Perth Oz 
|
QUOTE(alpha_company @ Jun 30 2009, 01:57 AM) got one time need to shoot in rainy conditions..but as with any dslr, anybody will try to avoid that kind of situation right.. if u cant avoid...u terpaksa have to shoot also..if not ur client will be disappointed. But make sure u have weather sealed lens too..looked at canon lenses...most of nikon's lenses start at 18mm like 18-55, 18-105, 18-135, 18-70 whereas canon mostly starts at 24 or 28mm..not wide enough for me.. even the same mfd lenses, the canon starts at 24/28mm...so it wont be as wide as a 18mm, so lens wise canon's are not so versatile.. though 10mp 40D will have a wider view than 12mp d90 at the same focal length because of the 40d's lower resolution.. the mp doesnt affect ur focal length..juz the crop factor of ur sensor.tht 0.1 diff not a lot la..haha.. |
|
|
Jun 30 2009, 01:38 PM
|
|
Senior Member
3,997 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Why So Serious?
|
QUOTE(pleasuresaurus @ Jun 30 2009, 12:37 PM) Thats a pretty old skool lens bro, u inherited it from parents or elder siblings? My uncle has one!  |
|
|
Jun 30 2009, 04:15 PM
|
Senior Member
1,930 posts Joined: Nov 2006 From: The Grid 
|
D3000?
 D5000 without video?  |
|
|
Jun 30 2009, 04:45 PM
|
Junior Member
26 posts Joined: Sep 2008
|
QUOTE(jsc_tidus @ Jun 30 2009, 04:15 PM) D3000? Looks like the 'd3000' photoshoppedD5000 without video? |
|
|
Jun 30 2009, 04:52 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Nov 2005
|
There is a possiblilty that it is real. Anyway... if you look on the right side... it is smaller and narrower than the D5000. With the D60 and D40 being phased out a D3000 should be a good replacement... but I hope no more 3-point AF sensor.
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0180sec
 0.19
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 02:27 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.