» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
QUOTE(Kii @ Mar 30 2009, 08:46 PM)
You're theories and philosophy are very historical.
Caveman age, where the women took care of the babies, they will choose among the strongest man. Correct.
And a few centuries ago, a lot of women are still illiterate, stays at home and still mothers the man's child. They don't mind if their husband is polygamous, the more wives, the richer, the prouder, the stronger. Correct.
And now, this era, come on, woman, you still need to leech on a rich man in order to survive? In order to be happy? In order to be proud?
We have the right to fight for monogamous relationship. We have the right to earn our own cash. Do you still think woman should not work, and just taking what the man brought home? And be happy if the man brought home a loooot of money.
I don't think I can be proud, if my husband is filthy rich but doesn't loves me or treat me accordingly, or the other way round.
I don't think wealth can guarantee happiness.
QUOTE(Kii @ Mar 30 2009, 08:46 PM)
I back-read a few previous debate here and somewhere in between, I read that Moorish stressed on
financial stability. Yes, that's very very important.
But what I do not agree is your first post
"So girls, be proud when you choose a rich husband, and to those girl who insist love is more important, they're just immature and the mother instinct not kick in yet, after few years of marriage they'll regret of their choice."
I still insist love is more important. Love can sail the boat a loong loooong way. Yes, of course, money are important but still wealth doesn't guarantee happiness.
QUOTE(<3<3<3 @ Mar 30 2009, 09:26 PM)
No matter who u choose , as long as u are happy is ok but got money but not happy, will u choose that? u may have everything in this world that can get by money but not love and loyalty. can u stay by that? U have friends that only come to u because u have money , without money ur like a rubbish to them.
QUOTE(parsona @ Mar 30 2009, 10:03 PM)
Most of your posts in this thread is simply excuses for you to justify your 'money mindedness'. You seem to stress that love is eventually pointless in life. You are entitled to your opinion on love of course, so let me ask you this. Since you believe that women should go back to your 'thousands of years' ago period where they select men that give them security (money in this era), would you agree to your husband cheating on you, disrespecting you, etc since thats how women were treated back then? After all, you don't really believe in love, so why would you care if your husband cheats rite?
Another question for you. Since you always claim that the money that you are after is for your kids, and not for your Myvi driving self, why don't you put in the effort to be as rich as your hubby so you can provide for your kids? Why must it be the husband who does it? Why do you take the easy way in life by just choosing a rich husband to get rich, instead of getting rich by your own doing?
Like I said earlier, if you only mean to tell people that its ok to girls to choose men who are responsible and can manage to bring up your kids decently, thats totally agreeable with everyone I'm sure. But your posts says that girls should be proud to choose rich husbands... that justs points to you being a money grabber who prefers to get rich on someone else's effort.
Finally, to answer your question.
Yes, I would like to come home to that clean tidy house. Who wouldn't? But in no way will I demand or even ask that my wife be the one that ensures a clean tidy house. I acknowledge that a home and a family is a combined responsibility, chores at home will be shared equally among equals.
It is not up to us to decide if a man changes his heart, I do not agree with sharing my man if given a choice, but unfortunately I've seen too many man fooling outside. I've seen the poorer man and the richer man womanizing, the consequences of the both
The richer one can still provide for the wife and kids
The poorer one will sweet talk you to work and fend for yourself and the kids while he fend for the one outside.
How many times had I emphasize that the possibility of the rich or poor man womanize or fall out of love after 7 years tying the knots chances are equal ? what makes you think that just becoz you're lovey dovey with your bf and he will remain like that eternally?
If you;ve frens, or relative who had divorce, try to CSI her case, are they not so in love to the point that even parent object they still go ahead and then what happen?
And I'm sure you also have frens or relative who had married the richer or poorer and still going strong too. And so you know the chance are equal.
What makes you think those who are rich isnt enjoying their life? touring europe with their children on school holidays, getting a 1carat diamond ring for your birthday, enjoying your SPA and facial treatment at exclusive place, driving your BMW, having a maid to take care of choir, and shop like crazy with a 300sq/ft walk in wardrobe to fit in all your dress. And dont be fool into thinking that love doesnt exist for the rich man, he is afterall also a man.
Those woman that shed tears everynight are those with husband that are fooling around outside and has fallen out of love and definitely they dun cry because their husband is rich, because the poorer man's chances of this are equal.
Wealth doesnt guarantee happiness but love also do not guarantee happiness, you're again talking on extreme end here.
I'm not trying to change your perception or choice, obviously you can can choose love or whatever, but why insist those who do are wrong or hate them just because you disagree when they dont hate you for your choices? Am I spose to hate and not talk to my fren who had chosen love and got divorce and tell her dai sei?
if you look at the extreme end, you divorce a rich man you still able to get a house or a fat alimony for your kids, when you divorce a poor man you most probably have to even pay the divorce lawyer fee! or some cases haunt by ah long.