Thanks Cergau for posting that newsclip, read it earlier today but was on the road. Heres one from the Star;
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=...5583&sec=nationFederation of Swiftlet Nest Merchants Association chairman Datuk Beh Heng Seong said the guideline would resolve the problem as owners of premises would have to agree with the conditions if they wanted to remain in business.
“It will become a standard for all local authorities,” he said.Now... if all i said was true from reading the 'draft' 1GP... quoting in BM;
6.1 Status Tanah
i. hendaklah dikategorikan sebagai bangunan perniagaan
ii. bagi bangunan 'free standing' di atas tanah pertanian, syarat nyata tanah ditukar kepada kategori bangunan perniagaan.
6.2 Jarak Bangunan
i. Mempunyai jarak 150m daripada mana-mana bangunan kediaman berdekatan
ii. Hendaklah tidak kurang dari 0.5km daripada kawasan perumahan dan bangunan komersial
6.10 is about Rakaman Bunyi, totally contradicting statements in item (6.10)i, ii, ii with iv and item 7.3 prohibits 'Penggunaan Alat Memanggil Burung'.
6.17 is about Kuasa Pegawai;
i. 'hendaklah membenarkan pegawai daripada Majlis serta mana-mana pegawai agensi kerajaan yang berkaitan untuk memasuki mana-mana rumah burung atau premis untuk menjalankan pemeriksaan pada bila-bila masa'.
ii. PBT bersama lain-lain pihak berkuasa boleh menutup/menyita, memindah, termasuk kuasa memecah masuk premis bagi melupuskan apa-apa peralatan yang dirampas.
6.19 item ii. Dicadangkan jumlah bangunan yang dibenarkan menjalankan industri ini pada satu deretan bangunan pada kadar 1:5
(meaning to say, only 1 out of 5 units are allowed to be used for SSP's... and even this is attached with other conditions).
So next week they will table the 1GP... with all the do's and dont's... must this and that... if the cabinet does approve of such policies... then there's not much we can do. One obviously good thing about it, commercial lots are safe, as long as they abide and follow the rules... which translates into recommendations by 5-7 relevant agencies before licensing approval. It would seem Datuk Beh has done his job... on the other hand it would also seem that instead of DVS being the 'peneraju'... most of the authority is held by PBT's (and we all know which agency is synonymous with CORRUPTION and ABUSE of power).
What i really disagree is the change of land status for stand alones. JPBD itself doesn't have a standard specification for standalones... whatmore PBT. Commercial lots of course have CF... but asking standalones to follow suit... dunno la... lost for words. I am tempted to ask JPBD or PBT do they have standard specs for kandang lembu, kambing as well (SSP's is categorized as industry asas tani). I am also tempted to ask them to issue CF's for kandang lembu feedlot in the middle of estates or kolam ikan canvas or greenhouses (by definition 'pembangunan' could mean a single tiang yang dinaikkan). Since most agriland are 'kawasan kawalan' and not 'kawasan operasi'... i tend to use this loophole. If they want to gazette agriland into 'kawasan operasi'... lets see the kampung folk riot and bring the ruling party down (in other words... from no taxes, to being taxed). Cergau, thanks for the definitions of the land code... i only had them in BM, which ended up making me more confused. Its good material for reference).
Despite all this said... i do understand why they are doing this. The DVS faced a similar issue years back with poultry, namely chicken farming (kandang terbuka/tertutup). However... it should not be compared with that industry since there is a marked difference. A very-very big difference. Whatever it is... i plan to oppose parts of the draft. Screw them... they should have offered the public to view the draft earlier on and get feed back from a wider range of audiences. Not all of us are members of associations. I think i'll become a cynic like bro Cergau la. ;p
Agri to bangunan land... nak pergi convert satu hal!!(Pejabat Tanah, another agency littered with corruption).
I'll be making some noise tomorrow. It seems Unit Walit (seksyen aneka haiwan) is moving by itself without considering input from state DVS. Don't know how true that is yet. They made the old GAHP in a rushed and messy way... repeating the same mistake is not favorable for the departments integrity. All i can say, this new guideline will be a haven for MACC... opening far more corruption opportunities! Horey 1Malaysia!!!
(my apologies to all forumers... i do not have a scanner available here... i bloody want to share and get feedback from others)
hackwire... the powerful dark force might even be amongst SSP's themselves. Someone posted in V1 a proposal to the Johor State government... whereby a state controlled company was to handle A to Z regarding swiftlets... even licensing!!! One special purpose vehicle to rule them all! Bloody politicians (thank God they revised the GAHP, if not i believe many other state gov's might follow such an example). about public opinion... we still need to educate the public in whatever capacity we can. they normally hate or fear things they do not understand (typical Malay attitude, call me a racist if you want).
Added on February 20, 2010, 11:09 amBro Cergau, can u post the link for the National Land Code? thx.
This post has been edited by dunsuntutmybuntut: Feb 20 2010, 11:09 AM