cant wait for it to appear in dvd so i can watch more and try to understand this sophisticatedmovie,next month maybe?

If you cant really understand the movie during and after ,it cant be a great movie..
The director is full of shit in this one seriously

Even there's some fresh idea in this one but Is still generally SUX when you not too sure wtf u are watching..

Good acting and good visual effect in this but still goes down as one of the worse movie ever.
Some sort of 'cloverfield' class where u feel want to leave the cinema half way in it.

If you cant really understand the movie during and after ,it cant be a great movie..
The director is full of shit in this one seriously

Even there's some fresh idea in this one but Is still generally SUX when you not too sure wtf u are watching..

Good acting and good visual effect in this but still goes down as one of the worse movie ever.
Some sort of 'cloverfield' class where u feel want to leave the cinema half way in it.

Nice troll.

The fact that viewers continue to discuss the movie long after it ended -> it's a good film.

By your logic, Mulholland Drive is bad, Oldboy is bad, Donnie Darko is bad? Oh but wait, all three films are confusing yet they feature in many top movies of the decade lists!

Nice troll.

The fact that viewers continue to discuss the movie long after it ended -> it's a good film.

By your logic, Mulholland Drive is bad, Oldboy is bad, Donnie Darko is bad? Oh but wait, all three films are confusing yet they feature in many top movies of the decade lists!

The fact is people discussing this becos are really not too sure what's with the movie and hope to get some review here..Juz like why i came here to see and realize alot dont understand every plot in it.

A great movie sends out clear and beautiful message that will leave value to your life.That is call a great movie.
Definitely not like this one..Bcos it piss you off from its draggy and meaning less plots during and after it.
What a smart arse director which make people wont watch his work ever again

The fact is people discussing this becos are really not too sure what's with the movie and hope to get some review here..Juz like why i came here to see and realize alot dont understand every plot in it.

A great movie sends out clear and beautiful message that will leave value to your life.That is call a great movie.
Definitely not like this one..Bcos it piss you off from its draggy and meaning less plots during and after it.
What a smart arse director which make people wont watch his work ever again

If you cant really understand the movie during and after ,it cant be a great movie..
The director is full of shit in this one seriously

Even there's some fresh idea in this one but Is still generally SUX when you not too sure wtf u are watching..

Good acting and good visual effect in this but still goes down as one of the worse movie ever.
Some sort of 'cloverfield' class where u feel want to leave the cinema half way in it.

many sci fi movie never reveal everything in they plot and thus allow viewer to work their brain and come out with their imagination, this is the good thing about sci fi that stimulate your mind instead of having the plot being explain to you in great detail.

for example

who is the space jockey in Alien

is deckard a replicant in blade runner

what is the monolith in 2001, and what the hell does the ending mean

why does the alien landed in district 9

The fact is people discussing this becos are really not too sure what's with the movie and hope to get some review here..Juz like why i came here to see and realize alot dont understand every plot in it.

A great movie sends out clear and beautiful message that will leave value to your life.That is call a great movie.
Definitely not like this one..Bcos it piss you off from its draggy and meaning less plots during and after it.
What a smart arse director which make people wont watch his work ever again

What a smart arse director which make me and me alone in the entire world wont watch his work ever again

I dont think Dileep is right about Fischer being the dreamer. He was the subject for all the levels; meaning it was his subconscious populating the dream levels that was created by various team members. The snow level was indeed Eames's dream but it was Fischer's subconscious populating the level. This help explains the various security inconsistencies in the film. When in level one, his military training didnt kick in until he was kidnapped. When he realizes he was in danger, his subconscious tries to set him free of the anxiety attack. Once he was knocked out in level one, his dream resets to level 2 which also resets the 'alarm' in level 2 (but not in level 1). Initially in level 2, his military training was kept in check due to him not being aware of what of what was going on. But as Cobb explains to him about what was was going on, his anxiety starts to creep once again and this sets off his military self defense mechanism. In level 3, he was fully aware that he was in a dream and this right away triggers his defense mechanism and it goes into search and destroy mode.

Funny how people always take fiction way too seriously, but of course, everyone has the right to ponder the meaning of a work.

But sometimes, really, a work of fiction doesn't usually contain any other meaning that what the author and the reader (or in this case, viewer) ascribes to it.

It might be the case that Nolan has it all figured out in his mind. It might be that he has just worked up a story he himself doesn't know the meaning of.

If you've played Shadow of the Colossus (perhaps the only VG that can truly be called "art") you'd know that it has a head-scratching ending and the director of that game himself admitted he doesn't know what the ending means, and that it was up to you to interpret it yourself.

I suspect Kubrick himself didn't know what the ending of 2001 was (perhaps he did, but more likely he left it to the viewer to determine for themselves. As such there is no "true" meaning to the ending) unless you follow Arthur Clarke's novel.

So chill dudes.

Funny how people always take fiction way too seriously, but of course, everyone has the right to ponder the meaning of a work.

Good explanation! 

But still, I want to know why didn't the van's impact act as a kick to wake Arthur up?