Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
119 Pages « < 21 22 23 24 25 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 CLOSED

views
     
huh
post Feb 22 2009, 03:57 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
994 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL


Looking around for a 42" full HD LCD TV.
Shortlisted:
1. Sharp LC42A65M - RM4,350
2. Toshiba 42RV500E - RM3,800
3. Panasonic TX-42LZ80MK - RM3,480
(all prices taken from forummers)

Let's put price aside first.

On paper, Toshiba looks to be the best performer (unless I'm missing something)
Contrast ratio: 4000:1 compared to Sharp's 2000:1 (unstated on Panny)
Response time: relatively decent 6.5ms (unstated on Sharp/Panny)
Colour processing: 10 bit vs Sharp's 8 bit (unstated on Panny)

The only one from this list I've seen in action is the Sharp today in Bangsar Village - employees played an SD source making it look disgusting.

Main usage: watching blu-rays with occasional gaming (PS3)

I'm inclined to go for the Toshiba - nice price and specs but would appreciate some recommendation/feedback from those who have any of the above sets or experience with those brands.

This post has been edited by huh: Feb 22 2009, 03:58 AM
ronaldjoe
post Feb 22 2009, 01:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
6.5ms kinda slow, 5ms would be decent
huh
post Feb 22 2009, 02:25 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
994 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL


Hmm I thought for TV 6.5ms is not too bad.
For monitor yeah it's a bit slow.
Jcsy
post Feb 22 2009, 07:41 PM

Frag First! Think Later?
*******
Senior Member
2,782 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: BANGSARian
QUOTE(huh @ Feb 22 2009, 03:57 AM)
Looking around for a 42" full HD LCD TV.
Shortlisted:
1. Sharp LC42A65M - RM4,350
2. Toshiba 42RV500E - RM3,800
3. Panasonic TX-42LZ80MK - RM3,480
(all prices taken from forummers)

Let's put price aside first.

On paper, Toshiba looks to be the best performer (unless I'm missing something)
Contrast ratio: 4000:1 compared to Sharp's 2000:1 (unstated on Panny)
Response time: relatively decent 6.5ms (unstated on Sharp/Panny)
Colour processing: 10 bit vs Sharp's 8 bit (unstated on Panny)

The only one from this list I've seen in action is the Sharp today in Bangsar Village - employees played an SD source making it look disgusting.

Main usage: watching blu-rays with occasional gaming (PS3)

I'm inclined to go for the Toshiba - nice price and specs but would appreciate some recommendation/feedback from those who have any of the above sets or experience with those brands.
*
at 42" above, i really suggest getting plasma loh

wonder why your choice is on LCD's
gyver
post Feb 22 2009, 07:50 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,067 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
QUOTE(Jcsy @ Feb 22 2009, 07:41 PM)
at 42" above, i really suggest getting plasma loh

wonder why your choice is on LCD's
*
Yup agreed. Also don't rush but better see all of them in action in accordance to your expected usage.
Jcsy
post Feb 22 2009, 07:54 PM

Frag First! Think Later?
*******
Senior Member
2,782 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: BANGSARian
so far after going for a 3 hour demo from another lowyat reseller on

Plasma vs LCD

Plasma just killed LCD in every situation possible

eg : Karaoke Text , Sports (blurring) , Underwater colour (over exposure) , Black demo , skin colour demo, refresh rate demo, gaming , PQ , brightness, lifetime, power consumption and many more =.=

of course, the wallet kills too but i think plasma is worth the investment , at least something that will last 5 - 10 years or so smile.gif

This post has been edited by Jcsy: Feb 22 2009, 07:55 PM
azbro
post Feb 22 2009, 08:32 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,403 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Johor Bahru


QUOTE(Jcsy @ Feb 22 2009, 07:54 PM)
so far after going for a 3 hour demo from another lowyat reseller on

Plasma vs LCD

Plasma just killed LCD in every situation possible

eg : Karaoke Text , Sports (blurring) , Underwater colour (over exposure) , Black demo , skin colour demo, refresh rate demo, gaming , PQ , brightness, lifetime, power consumption and many more =.=

of course, the wallet kills too but i think plasma is worth the investment , at least something that will last 5 - 10 years or so smile.gif
*
I would agree, but the latest models from Sony are getting better and better...but for only the high range ones...so, if wan a LCD comparable to Plasma be prepared with lotsa money.

huh
post Feb 22 2009, 09:00 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
994 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL


The two things holding me back from plasma:
1. 1024x768 resolution for a plasma below RM4k
Not sure how this fares when watching blu-rays or playing PS3

2. Pixel burn-in
Granted, this is less of an issue nowadays with new technology, but the fact that warranty does not cover this still seems a little...risky to me
mikapoh
post Feb 22 2009, 09:19 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,263 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Kuching, Sarawak.
QUOTE(huh @ Feb 22 2009, 09:00 PM)
The two things holding me back from plasma:
1. 1024x768 resolution for a plasma below RM4k
Not sure how this fares when watching blu-rays or playing PS3

2. Pixel burn-in
Granted, this is less of an issue nowadays with new technology, but the fact that warranty does not cover this still seems a little...risky to me
*
768, 720 compare to 1080p will not make a clear difference if your sitting position is over 6 feet. If you really want to enjoy full hd resolution, go grab a bigger size tv. Suggest over 50inch tv to really see its best.







Jcsy
post Feb 22 2009, 09:47 PM

Frag First! Think Later?
*******
Senior Member
2,782 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: BANGSARian
QUOTE(mikapoh @ Feb 22 2009, 09:19 PM)
768, 720 compare to 1080p will not make a clear difference if your sitting position is over 6 feet. If you really want to enjoy full hd resolution, go grab a bigger size tv. Suggest over 50inch tv to really see its best.
*
full hd = 1920 x 1080

which means the resolution is 1920 x 1080

hd would mean 1280 x 720

notice the back numbers

normally plasma are 42 above, which are also full hd liao meaning the resolution is much higher than wat u said =.=

if u go find 37 plasma then thats your choice, make sure its full hd for the resolution smile.gif

This post has been edited by Jcsy: Feb 22 2009, 09:47 PM
ic-klass
post Feb 22 2009, 10:12 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
959 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
QUOTE(Jcsy @ Feb 22 2009, 07:54 PM)
so far after going for a 3 hour demo from another lowyat reseller on

Plasma vs LCD

Plasma just killed LCD in every situation possible

eg : Karaoke Text , Sports (blurring) , Underwater colour (over exposure) , Black demo , skin colour demo, refresh rate demo, gaming , PQ , brightness, lifetime, power consumption and many more =.=

of course, the wallet kills too but i think plasma is worth the investment , at least something that will last 5 - 10 years or so smile.gif
*
Hope this honest review will help to decide future buyer of flat screen...
It's not just about resolution.... thumbup.gif
ar188
post Feb 22 2009, 11:19 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(ic-klass @ Feb 22 2009, 10:12 PM)
Hope this honest review will help to decide future buyer of flat screen...
It's not just about resolution....  thumbup.gif
*
wah you dun scared after LCD supporter come chase you.. biggrin.gif
Jcsy
post Feb 22 2009, 11:50 PM

Frag First! Think Later?
*******
Senior Member
2,782 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: BANGSARian
i am not scared of LCD supporter, lol its sometimes that obvious tongue.gif
edwintey
post Feb 23 2009, 12:38 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
I agree, go for Plasma, you won't regret. rclxms.gif
Jcsy
post Feb 23 2009, 01:30 AM

Frag First! Think Later?
*******
Senior Member
2,782 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: BANGSARian
if 32 37 u can fight lcd down there lor

but once come 42 above, u fight plasma

and anything bigger and richer, projector tongue.gif
myqd
post Feb 23 2009, 01:02 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


just got myself a PANA TH-42PV80HM,astro viewing i still leave it at 4:3 ( more or less like 29" CRT TV tongue.gif ),PQ not bad at all,quite satisfy smile.gif BD viewing from PS3 only tried few bds,no complaint for the price i paid. biggrin.gif
ar188
post Feb 23 2009, 01:39 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(myqd @ Feb 23 2009, 01:02 PM)
just got myself a PANA TH-42PV80HM,astro viewing i still leave it at 4:3 ( more or less like 29" CRT TV tongue.gif ),PQ not bad at all,quite satisfy  smile.gif BD viewing from PS3 only tried few bds,no complaint for the price i paid.  biggrin.gif
*
you leave it on for month with astro running few hours on 4:3 mode and see got any burn in or not on the left/right side black bars? wondering if they settle the issue yet..
Jcsy
post Feb 23 2009, 04:26 PM

Frag First! Think Later?
*******
Senior Member
2,782 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: BANGSARian
welcome to PV 42 club biggrin.gif

awesome plasma tv so far i would say.. defeats all its counterparts at similiar price range and more
DigitalTech
post Feb 23 2009, 04:33 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Petaling Jaya



PV80H Rocks!!!


myqd
post Feb 23 2009, 06:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


QUOTE(ar188 @ Feb 23 2009, 01:39 PM)
you leave it on for month with astro running few hours on 4:3 mode and see got any burn in or not on the left/right side black bars? wondering if they settle the issue yet..
*
Alamak,dun scare me la,really kah? shocking.gif I tot oni CRT got this kind of issue liao? anyone can confirm this,if so,i better switch it to 16:9 sad.gif


119 Pages « < 21 22 23 24 25 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0273sec    0.69    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 07:41 AM