|
huh
|
Feb 22 2009, 03:57 AM
|
|
Looking around for a 42" full HD LCD TV. Shortlisted: 1. Sharp LC42A65M - RM4,350 2. Toshiba 42RV500E - RM3,800 3. Panasonic TX-42LZ80MK - RM3,480 (all prices taken from forummers) Let's put price aside first. On paper, Toshiba looks to be the best performer (unless I'm missing something) Contrast ratio: 4000:1 compared to Sharp's 2000:1 (unstated on Panny) Response time: relatively decent 6.5ms (unstated on Sharp/Panny) Colour processing: 10 bit vs Sharp's 8 bit (unstated on Panny) The only one from this list I've seen in action is the Sharp today in Bangsar Village - employees played an SD source making it look disgusting. Main usage: watching blu-rays with occasional gaming (PS3) I'm inclined to go for the Toshiba - nice price and specs but would appreciate some recommendation/feedback from those who have any of the above sets or experience with those brands. This post has been edited by huh: Feb 22 2009, 03:58 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
ronaldjoe
|
Feb 22 2009, 01:42 PM
|
|
6.5ms kinda slow, 5ms would be decent
|
|
|
|
|
|
huh
|
Feb 22 2009, 02:25 PM
|
|
Hmm I thought for TV 6.5ms is not too bad. For monitor yeah it's a bit slow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jcsy
|
Feb 22 2009, 07:41 PM
|
|
QUOTE(huh @ Feb 22 2009, 03:57 AM) Looking around for a 42" full HD LCD TV. Shortlisted: 1. Sharp LC42A65M - RM4,350 2. Toshiba 42RV500E - RM3,800 3. Panasonic TX-42LZ80MK - RM3,480 (all prices taken from forummers) Let's put price aside first. On paper, Toshiba looks to be the best performer (unless I'm missing something) Contrast ratio: 4000:1 compared to Sharp's 2000:1 (unstated on Panny) Response time: relatively decent 6.5ms (unstated on Sharp/Panny) Colour processing: 10 bit vs Sharp's 8 bit (unstated on Panny) The only one from this list I've seen in action is the Sharp today in Bangsar Village - employees played an SD source making it look disgusting. Main usage: watching blu-rays with occasional gaming (PS3) I'm inclined to go for the Toshiba - nice price and specs but would appreciate some recommendation/feedback from those who have any of the above sets or experience with those brands. at 42" above, i really suggest getting plasma loh wonder why your choice is on LCD's
|
|
|
|
|
|
gyver
|
Feb 22 2009, 07:50 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Jcsy @ Feb 22 2009, 07:41 PM) at 42" above, i really suggest getting plasma loh wonder why your choice is on LCD's Yup agreed. Also don't rush but better see all of them in action in accordance to your expected usage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jcsy
|
Feb 22 2009, 07:54 PM
|
|
so far after going for a 3 hour demo from another lowyat reseller on Plasma vs LCD Plasma just killed LCD in every situation possible eg : Karaoke Text , Sports (blurring) , Underwater colour (over exposure) , Black demo , skin colour demo, refresh rate demo, gaming , PQ , brightness, lifetime, power consumption and many more =.= of course, the wallet kills too but i think plasma is worth the investment , at least something that will last 5 - 10 years or so This post has been edited by Jcsy: Feb 22 2009, 07:55 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
azbro
|
Feb 22 2009, 08:32 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Jcsy @ Feb 22 2009, 07:54 PM) so far after going for a 3 hour demo from another lowyat reseller on Plasma vs LCD Plasma just killed LCD in every situation possible eg : Karaoke Text , Sports (blurring) , Underwater colour (over exposure) , Black demo , skin colour demo, refresh rate demo, gaming , PQ , brightness, lifetime, power consumption and many more =.= of course, the wallet kills too but i think plasma is worth the investment , at least something that will last 5 - 10 years or so  I would agree, but the latest models from Sony are getting better and better...but for only the high range ones...so, if wan a LCD comparable to Plasma be prepared with lotsa money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
huh
|
Feb 22 2009, 09:00 PM
|
|
The two things holding me back from plasma: 1. 1024x768 resolution for a plasma below RM4k Not sure how this fares when watching blu-rays or playing PS3
2. Pixel burn-in Granted, this is less of an issue nowadays with new technology, but the fact that warranty does not cover this still seems a little...risky to me
|
|
|
|
|
|
mikapoh
|
Feb 22 2009, 09:19 PM
|
|
QUOTE(huh @ Feb 22 2009, 09:00 PM) The two things holding me back from plasma: 1. 1024x768 resolution for a plasma below RM4k Not sure how this fares when watching blu-rays or playing PS3 2. Pixel burn-in Granted, this is less of an issue nowadays with new technology, but the fact that warranty does not cover this still seems a little...risky to me 768, 720 compare to 1080p will not make a clear difference if your sitting position is over 6 feet. If you really want to enjoy full hd resolution, go grab a bigger size tv. Suggest over 50inch tv to really see its best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jcsy
|
Feb 22 2009, 09:47 PM
|
|
QUOTE(mikapoh @ Feb 22 2009, 09:19 PM) 768, 720 compare to 1080p will not make a clear difference if your sitting position is over 6 feet. If you really want to enjoy full hd resolution, go grab a bigger size tv. Suggest over 50inch tv to really see its best. full hd = 1920 x 1080 which means the resolution is 1920 x 1080 hd would mean 1280 x 720 notice the back numbers normally plasma are 42 above, which are also full hd liao meaning the resolution is much higher than wat u said =.= if u go find 37 plasma then thats your choice, make sure its full hd for the resolution This post has been edited by Jcsy: Feb 22 2009, 09:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
ic-klass
|
Feb 22 2009, 10:12 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Jcsy @ Feb 22 2009, 07:54 PM) so far after going for a 3 hour demo from another lowyat reseller on Plasma vs LCD Plasma just killed LCD in every situation possible
eg : Karaoke Text , Sports (blurring) , Underwater colour (over exposure) , Black demo , skin colour demo, refresh rate demo, gaming , PQ , brightness, lifetime, power consumption and many more =.= of course, the wallet kills too but i think plasma is worth the investment , at least something that will last 5 - 10 years or so  Hope this honest review will help to decide future buyer of flat screen... It's not just about resolution....
|
|
|
|
|
|
ar188
|
Feb 22 2009, 11:19 PM
|
|
QUOTE(ic-klass @ Feb 22 2009, 10:12 PM) Hope this honest review will help to decide future buyer of flat screen... It's not just about resolution....  wah you dun scared after LCD supporter come chase you..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jcsy
|
Feb 22 2009, 11:50 PM
|
|
i am not scared of LCD supporter, lol its sometimes that obvious
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jcsy
|
Feb 23 2009, 01:30 AM
|
|
if 32 37 u can fight lcd down there lor but once come 42 above, u fight plasma and anything bigger and richer, projector
|
|
|
|
|
|
myqd
|
Feb 23 2009, 01:02 PM
|
|
just got myself a PANA TH-42PV80HM,astro viewing i still leave it at 4:3 ( more or less like 29" CRT TV  ),PQ not bad at all,quite satisfy  BD viewing from PS3 only tried few bds,no complaint for the price i paid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ar188
|
Feb 23 2009, 01:39 PM
|
|
QUOTE(myqd @ Feb 23 2009, 01:02 PM) just got myself a PANA TH-42PV80HM,astro viewing i still leave it at 4:3 ( more or less like 29" CRT TV  ),PQ not bad at all,quite satisfy  BD viewing from PS3 only tried few bds,no complaint for the price i paid.  you leave it on for month with astro running few hours on 4:3 mode and see got any burn in or not on the left/right side black bars? wondering if they settle the issue yet..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jcsy
|
Feb 23 2009, 04:26 PM
|
|
welcome to PV 42 club  awesome plasma tv so far i would say.. defeats all its counterparts at similiar price range and more
|
|
|
|
|
|
DigitalTech
|
Feb 23 2009, 04:33 PM
|
|
PV80H Rocks!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
myqd
|
Feb 23 2009, 06:05 PM
|
|
QUOTE(ar188 @ Feb 23 2009, 01:39 PM) you leave it on for month with astro running few hours on 4:3 mode and see got any burn in or not on the left/right side black bars? wondering if they settle the issue yet.. Alamak,dun scare me la,really kah?  I tot oni CRT got this kind of issue liao? anyone can confirm this,if so,i better switch it to 16:9
|
|
|
|
|