I just find it sick,rather epic like the nuclear bomb detonation in MW1.It's cool in it's own way,but disturbing in some other way.The nuclear bomb isnt disturbing to the point till i dont even feel like playing it.

Im seriously just not a fan of this mission in MW2.

The snow mission was damn cool.The Brazilian one is decent too.Just not this one in a Russian Airport.

This post has been edited by Cheesenium: Oct 28 2009, 05:31 PM

---

Added on October 29, 2009, 9:06 amIm not stopping you from buying this.

Thats your money,not mine.

You just need to make the right decision.RM200 is overkill for a SP game and it's almost 2 games.

RM200 for a mediocre game is just not worth it at all.

CoD4 was great because of the MP,not just SP.

MW2 will be shit as there is no MP to keep the game going on after 6 months.How long will you spend your time playing the campaign? 2 years?

Dragon Age is a much better alternative,as it has a much longer gameplay and modding will add more stuff on top of what you have.Besides,it doesnt have a ridiculous price tag.

So,now,i cant have my own opinion on this game?

The shitty MP have already made me very disappointed with the game.Now,with the controversial campaign where you have a choice to gun down innocent people,is there anything wrong that i find it unacceptable and disturbing? Thats what i think and do i need to think in the same way as you?

Now,with a ridiculous price tag on it.Whats the point of getting this when you add about RM50,you can get 2 great games that is coming out at the same time?

This post has been edited by Cheesenium: Oct 29 2009, 09:06 AM

"OMG, you can shoot civvies, this game is shit"

I never said that.

The game is shit with all the nonsense that is in the game.

The civillian shooting is just sick.

Ok,the campaign is shit,along with the whole game.

Happy now?

Always love to pick out on every single thing i say.

TF2 is another bloody piece of crap movie.

Overeacting? Definitely,as they promised that "PC will always be the same".Now look at it,is it the same? The whole game is so different from MW1,especially on the MP side.

MW1 and the previous CoD got famous because of the MP,not the awesome SP that every CoD have.Now,they take away the crucial element of the game,why shouldnt people get pissed?

The SC community even get pissed over "little" things like MBS,no LAN or even the kissing Siege Tank.Should the CoD community that is playing on those 13000 servers out there should just shut up and spend 60USD for a game with no MP?

---

Added on October 29, 2009, 11:50 amIm walking the talk with not buying this piece of crap.90USD for this game.Hell no.I rather get DA + L4D2.

I have skipped the much better WaW.Dont see why i cant skip MW2.

The main reason im against IW and Activision is because of their greed,not the dedicated servers issue.They arent gonna give a shit on how you feel about the game,as as long as they get your money.Then,you people coming here and gonna give your money to those greedy people.RM200,seriously,thats a lot of money.


This post has been edited by Cheesenium: Oct 29 2009, 11:56 AM

I did not say MW1 campaign was crap.

Im pissed because of Activision and IW's attitude to the community,and their greed for money behind MW2.Why bother feeding them more money as they gonna treat their community like shit? I believe most people here will still end up buying this overpriced game.

I dont really like the civilian murdering level.Never expect that the part in the reveal trailer is actually a part of the main campaign.

Im not gonna play this at all.No point getting an overpriced game with no MP.Unless reviews proof otherwise.

deleted.

This post has been edited by Cheesenium: Oct 29 2009, 03:44 PM

How likely that a P2P system is better than a dedicated server?

None,as there are FPS that use P2P system.Their MP failed badly.

The only reasons im gonna buy is,dedicated servers is in MW2 or there are proof(ie: reviews) that IWNet indeed is a better replacement for dedicated servers.Other than that,hell no.

Seriously,do i need to explain every single thing i said? Or you just love to pick on people.

Do i really need to elaborate every single thing?



This post has been edited by Cheesenium: Oct 29 2009, 05:36 PM

I want this game,but it's screwed to the point that is not even worth buying.If they want to fix this sometime in the future,should i just still stop buying this? The game havent gone gold yet,and there is a very slim chance of it getting fixed.Or it's just wrong to be a bit optimistic on things in your book?

No doubt that i still hate Kotick for his greed,but not the CoD franchise.

Im still gonna avoid buying any Activision games now,until they fixed MW2 or changed in future titles.That doesnt mean forever,for gawd sakes.

To be honest,you does seem to pick on my every single post around here.Did i do anything bad to you before?

This post has been edited by Cheesenium: Oct 29 2009, 06:11 PM

Even if the SP is good,there is no reason for me to buy it as long as the MP is still P2P.

Everyone have saw it.

Aus might ban it again.

Nah,the sales frenzy havent start yet.

The boycott doesnt work at all.

Almost everyone seen the leaked trailer.

People havent started buying like crazy yet.IW still got time to hype it up.

Go get other games la.

MW2 is not worth paying for such a huge amount of money.

So,i expect you gonna buy too?

Thanks for making Kotick rich.

Thats nothing to wrong to enlighten people on how crap this game will be.

Whats wrong with spending 30USD for HoN?

They have what DotA offers,but they improve on whats lacking.It's DotA as a full priced game.

At least it's way better than MW2's crap.

Wow,so,you are willing to spend RM200 for a crap game that you'll throw away after 2-3 months?

Maybe you should buy me a copy so that i get to play the SP too and i get to spend my 60USD for L4D2 and Windows 7.

Thanks,mate.

Im not gonna buy this,until they put dedicated servers in.

Thats for sure.