Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V18, The Orange Legion
|
achew
|
 Dec 9 2008, 10:45 PM
|
|
QUOTE(soulfly @ Dec 9 2008, 07:39 PM) 16105 is Sony design. It was supposed to be an updated version of the CZ1680 but Carl Zeiss did not approve the design and forbid Sony from using the T* coating on the lens. Therefore it's sold as a normal lens. This means that this lens is as good as the Carl Zeiss 16-80 but without the Zeiss T* coating. As for 18250, it's just Tamron design. so can i say the quality is comparable btwn CZ1680 vs SAL16105?? omg..abit heartpained >.< btw...just a short survey...how many lenses do u guys usually bring..say for a trip?or normal outting?? i currently hving 50mm prime + cz1680.......might get a SAL70300G as a gift..but nt sure whether i would utiliz all the 3 lenses anot..coz my crumpler bag can only bring 2..lol..don wanna neglect any of my lens  |
|
|
|
|
|
joker_jr
|
Dec 9 2008, 10:46 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(Ahmike @ Dec 9 2008, 10:32 PM) Shootkk....try get a bigger bounce card. like davidnumbers and see if it helps also. As you recall i was using my demb flash panel that time also. Or you can get F58 also...MAUAHAHhaahahah. Shootkk kena bitten by cobra poison is spreading..yippee..  I also facing this kind of problem..... but thinking to get kitlens replacement first.  This post has been edited by joker_jr: Dec 9 2008, 10:46 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Ahmike
|
Dec 9 2008, 10:51 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(joker_jr @ Dec 9 2008, 10:46 PM) I also facing this kind of problem..... but thinking to get kitlens replacement first. What lens you aiming for ? if you seldom shoot dark area then go for lens. if you mostly shoot in dark area then better stanby a flash. |
|
|
|
|
|
joker_jr
|
Dec 9 2008, 11:00 PM
|
|
|
I already owned f42 n i think this flash was enuff at the moment.
I admit my skill sucks n still need to learn more about flash....
This post has been edited by joker_jr: Dec 9 2008, 11:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
signither
|
Dec 9 2008, 11:19 PM
|
|
|
newbie pic spam.. C&C welcome.. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
|
|
|
Ahmike
|
Dec 9 2008, 11:27 PM
|
|
|
sig : i like no.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
soulfly
|
Dec 9 2008, 11:33 PM
|
revving towards 10,000 rpm
|
QUOTE(achew @ Dec 9 2008, 10:45 PM) so can i say the quality is comparable btwn CZ1680 vs SAL16105?? omg..abit heartpained >.< btw...just a short survey...how many lenses do u guys usually bring..say for a trip?or normal outting?? i currently hving 50mm prime + cz1680.......might get a SAL70300G as a gift..but nt sure whether i would utiliz all the 3 lenses anot..coz my crumpler bag can only bring 2..lol..don wanna neglect any of my lens the 1680cz is better than 16105 in terms of contrast (awesome microcontrast from T* coating) and larger aperture. it's also slightly better in terms of corner sharpness. i guess you get what you paid for. i would get the zeiss if i have extra bucks... but for budget conscious people, 16105 is a wiser choice. it has better build quality than the zeiss. |
|
|
|
|
|
achew
|
Dec 9 2008, 11:52 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(soulfly @ Dec 9 2008, 11:33 PM) the 1680cz is better than 16105 in terms of contrast (awesome microcontrast from T* coating) and larger aperture. it's also slightly better in terms of corner sharpness. i guess you get what you paid for. i would get the zeiss if i have extra bucks... but for budget conscious people, 16105 is a wiser choice. it has better build quality than the zeiss. ohh..thanks for the clarification...lets hope im able to squiz the best out of my lens  |
|
|
|
|
|
signither
|
Dec 10 2008, 12:06 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(Ahmike @ Dec 9 2008, 11:27 PM) thanks bro  |
|
|
|
|
|
signither
|
Dec 10 2008, 01:02 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(kysham @ Oct 8 2008, 12:50 AM) hanafi: Any flash diffuser that can mount of the head of the Canon 580 EX II will fit the Sony F58. Why, because I tried the Lambency that was designed for the 580EX II and it fits nicely on the F58:  That is my hand holding the F58 attached with a Lambency that I detached from a 580EX II. sorry for quoting something old.. found this post while googling.. so, that's for F58.. how bout F42?? can use Canon 420 EX ka??  |
|
|
|
|
|
kysham
|
Dec 10 2008, 01:28 AM
|
|
|
Photo Spam!  This was shot in color, but was later converted to B&W in PC. Exif: A700 + SAL1118. F9.0, 1/500s, ISO200. More in my fllickr & photoblog pages. |
|
|
|
|
|
Ahmike
|
Dec 10 2008, 01:29 AM
|
|
|
wow kysham i love the mood.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kysham
|
Dec 10 2008, 01:32 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(Ahmike @ Dec 10 2008, 01:29 AM) wow kysham i love the mood. Thanks, Ahmike. Glad you liked it. |
|
|
|
|
|
vcxv
|
Dec 10 2008, 01:35 AM
|
|
|
kysham, do u have picture taken with f58 +lambency?
im thinking of getting gary fong universal lightsphere but couldnt decided yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kysham
|
Dec 10 2008, 01:40 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(vcxv @ Dec 10 2008, 01:35 AM) kysham, do u have picture taken with f58 +lambency? im thinking of getting gary fong universal lightsphere but couldnt decided yet. erm... you mean photo taken with the F58 + Lambency? Don't think so... Signither just quoted a photo where I was holding the F58 with Lambency attached. I was just playing around with it. Not really taking photos with it. So can't really judge if it is any good or not. Should be acceptable, I think? Any Lambency users here?  |
|
|
|
|
|
signither
|
Dec 10 2008, 01:45 AM
|
|
|
lambency diffuser vs omni-bounce.. which one is better ya??
|
|
|
|
|
|
vikingw2k
|
Dec 10 2008, 01:47 AM
|
LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
|
QUOTE(signither @ Dec 10 2008, 01:45 AM) lambency diffuser vs omni-bounce.. which one is better ya?? Omni-bounce you mean the "condom" like diffuser aka Stofen-Omnibounce? Lambency anytime for me, but sometimes I felt that it's pretty heavy and distracting. I'm using Demb now. Kinda like it due to its weight.  |
|
|
|
|
|
kysham
|
Dec 10 2008, 01:49 AM
|
|
|
Stofen Omnibounce for the compact & easy to carry, Lambency for the sheer additional surface area it offers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
vcxv
|
Dec 10 2008, 01:52 AM
|
|
|
@kysham - for your halloween pic last time? u did use the flash, rite? with internal bounce card?
|
|
|
|
|
|
signither
|
Dec 10 2008, 01:55 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Dec 10 2008, 01:47 AM) Omni-bounce you mean the "condom" like diffuser aka Stofen-Omnibounce? Lambency anytime for me, but sometimes I felt that it's pretty heavy and distracting. I'm using Demb now. Kinda like it due to its weight. QUOTE(kysham @ Dec 10 2008, 01:49 AM) Stofen Omnibounce for the compact & easy to carry, Lambency for the sheer additional surface area it offers. so i guess it means that Lambency is better that Omnibounce right? btw, i was asking, it's known that 580EX diffuser/bouncer can fit F58, how about F42 ya?? |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0261sec
0.30
6 queries
GZIP Disabled