QUOTE(thesaufi @ Oct 30 2012, 12:54 PM)
yeah i guess there are 2 mentalities to watching bond. the newer fans might want to go for realism but the original bond up until pierce brosnans last film is all about escapism, a mans fantasies of being a spy, not really about being a spy. i mean, what kind of spy would everyone villain in the world knows about, and gladly telling people his real name, "Bond, James Bond".
the success of the bourne series prompted the producers to go younger, more direct, and brutal with craig and the bruising action scenes and camerawork. while lifelong fans of bond had no real sense of escapism.
while Casino Royale is a very fine movie when judged by today action movies standard, comparing it with older bond movies since the times of Sean Roger and Pierce feels like an awkward shift. anyway i would still go watch Skyfall just out of sheer fandom of James Bond.

well, there are tons of people who felt the bourne series came out (or other pretenders), not only were seem more brutal in the actions (realism) hence probably the pressure to the owners of 'bond' (EON productions & Broccoli). Skyfall continues from same type of what if "real world scenarios" like CR & QOS but in terms of story, it has a lot more bite. Here we too see more glimpse into bond's past &..
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
we too find out M's actual name and how she had some hand or in some ways in shaping Andrew Bond's son being who he is, though i think there is some disjointment for what we saw or know of from CR, i need to rewatch them back to back to find out what bugged me
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
In skyfall, we will also see & officially acknowledge in a film that Q, M, probably too other double 0's are just nick or codes & successors that replaces them will also adopt that designation.
This post has been edited by koolspyda: Oct 30 2012, 01:07 PM