QUOTE(cp7111269 @ Nov 2 2008, 09:07 AM)
Another round of price cut? So far LG is doing it, doesn't see any Samsungs
CLOSED
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 10:23 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,234 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 10:42 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
686 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(cybersonic23 @ Nov 1 2008, 09:56 PM) some people do multitasking like multiple word applications, multiple excel applications and multiple other apps... XD like my office, almost all pc in my office are dual monitor, as we need to view a lot of screens at the same time, not feasible to keep switching tabs... this is correct. I'm currently using dual 17" lcd with my C2D rig....been running this setup for the past 2 weeks or so...while waiting to get a 22" lcd...IMO, very good for multi-tasking....surfing LYN on 1 screen, surfing DCM on another.... |
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 11:05 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,234 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
Since the LG 226 is so cheap, has anyone seen it before? What is the colors like? I've been reading 30 pages at HardForum and 13 pages at Anandtech and most they talk about is where to get it as opposed to what colors it is producing. with 1000:1 typical Ratio, supposedly be better than the other LG 2252wtq with 700:1, from the specs no?
This post has been edited by kaiserreich: Nov 2 2008, 11:07 AM |
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 11:12 AM
|
|
Elite
8,711 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan |
QUOTE(kaiserreich @ Nov 2 2008, 11:05 AM) Since the LG 226 is so cheap, has anyone seen it before? What is the colors like? I've been reading 30 pages at HardForum and 13 pages at Anandtech and most they talk about is where to get it as opposed to what colors it is producing. with 1000:1 typical Ratio, supposedly be better than the other LGs with 700:1, from the specs no? ![]() Black frame with white stand, at the 1st look u might feel weird with that color mismatch, but after a while of usage u'll get to used with it. |
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 11:42 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,907 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Pahang |
QUOTE(michaelyii1988 @ Nov 2 2008, 02:22 AM) Mine only HD2600XT but can use 22". The problem is not about getting a good resolution but your pc performance when playing games. I have no problem playing DMV4 with my rig although I get lower fps ( 25~30) when playing at high resolution (1280x1024) and using dx10. So, I believe higher range of GC will have no problem.But if you just want to use for internet, or word and divx movie, lower end gc is enough. QUOTE(cp7111269 @ Nov 2 2008, 09:07 AM) Don't get wrong with LG W2242T with LG W2252TQ. W2242T priced at RM599 while W2252TQ prices at RM9++. The only place I heard selling W2252TQ for RM6++ is at Sunway Pyramid. Heard from one of forumer here. But may be those seller give him wrong model. Lucky him.This post has been edited by qwerty79: Nov 2 2008, 11:49 AM |
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 12:12 PM
|
|
Elite
8,711 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan |
QUOTE(qwerty79 @ Nov 2 2008, 11:42 AM) Mine only HD2600XT but can use 22". The problem is not about getting a good resolution but your pc performance when playing games. I have no problem playing DMV4 with my rig although I get lower fps ( 25~30) when playing at high resolution (1280x1024) and using dx10. So, I believe higher range of GC will have no problem. Prestige IT's selling W2252TQ for RM650.But if you just want to use for internet, or word and divx movie, lower end gc is enough. Don't get wrong with LG W2242T with LG W2252TQ. W2242T priced at RM599 while W2252TQ prices at RM9++. The only place I heard selling W2252TQ for RM6++ is at Sunway Pyramid. Heard from one of forumer here. But may be those seller give him wrong model. Lucky him. http://www.pitb.com.my/download/accessories.pdf |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 12:55 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,221 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Deneb star |
Why most people still suggest Samsung 2253LW even with LG 2252WTQ?Is it because the Samsung has better image quality?
|
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 01:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,907 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Pahang |
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Nov 2 2008, 12:12 PM) Really, that's cheap. If only I live in KL, will have lots of other choice. |
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 01:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,221 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Deneb star |
Hmm guys maybe last questions..Samsung 2253LW and LG2252WTQ which one has better in image quality?
|
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 01:24 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
49 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Kluang, Johor |
Don't get wrong with LG W2242T with LG W2252TQ. W2242T priced at RM599 while W2252TQ prices at RM9++. The only place I heard selling W2252TQ for RM6++ is at Sunway Pyramid. Heard from one of forumer here. But may be those seller give him wrong model. Lucky him. [/quote] i'm very sure that is lg2252wtq, lg2252wtq is so much different with lg2242, All it also got lg2252, but the price is RM699 |
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 01:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,907 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Pahang |
If compare the spec side by side, LG W2252TQ is much better from Samsung 2253LW.
LG have 22" screen size, 10,000 DC and lighter. But the typical contrast only 700. Never seen this model before, so can't give real life comparison. BTW, I think LG malaysia wrongly put the resolution size. Suppose to be 1680 x 1050, not 1440 x 900 right? This post has been edited by qwerty79: Nov 2 2008, 01:36 PM |
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 01:46 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
49 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Kluang, Johor |
what the different between dynamic contrast ratio and typical contrast ratio
|
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 02:03 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,221 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Deneb star |
Hmm IF the Samsung 2253LW is 22" Screen,LG still better or Samsung?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 02:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,907 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Pahang |
This is the answer I get from Yahoo! Answer
QUOTE Static contrast ratio is the better value to use for comparison because it describes the blacks and white more accurately. As you said, since most companies no longer use this value anymore, then we have to rely on comparing dynamic contrast ratio. The reason why companies use dynamic because it is a higher number. The general public tend to buy things with higher specs because they are uneducated about electronics. A good static number is above 1500:1. A good dynamic number is 7000:1 or higher. There isn't an exact formula to convert static to dynamic, as they are not directly related. Generally speaking, it's usually 4 to 5 times the static. For me, I only use typical contrast. When I set to dynamic contrast, sometimes the screen will be too bright and too dark. So far, as I'm still less than a week using my lcd monitor, I can't see any use of dynamic contrast. |
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 02:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,439 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kapit and Simanggang, S'wak |
wow... version 5 already
nice then... being reading since version 3 anyway... going to buy bigger lcd this year end at kuching town want to ask my sister to buy since she is in ukm but i scared she woould spoilt the new lcd on the way back here any forumer can suggest to me nice 22" lcd for gaming n movies??? my budget would be not more than rm800 now i am using samsung syncmaster 732n serve me for 1 year already my rig would be leadteck7800gt extreme on e8400 with 2gb ddr800 thanks in advance for all suggestion |
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 02:23 PM
|
|
Elite
8,711 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan |
QUOTE(AMDAthlon @ Nov 2 2008, 12:55 PM) Why most people still suggest Samsung 2253LW even with LG 2252WTQ?Is it because the Samsung has better image quality? QUOTE(AMDAthlon @ Nov 2 2008, 01:09 PM) QUOTE(AMDAthlon @ Nov 2 2008, 02:03 PM) Lolz.. pity u asked so many times liao. This question is kinda subjective from person to person.As mentioned earlier, go to shop & see them side by side. |
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 02:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,907 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Pahang |
Yahloo.. go compare side by side, then you know. This one really subjective.
|
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 04:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
843 posts Joined: May 2008 From: S'wak Kuching |
that also a reason no people dare to answer you. Maybe i like the Samsung design but you don't.
performance both are ok. just the difference function and design. |
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 05:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,752 posts Joined: May 2008 |
Any LCD have DVI+HDMI 24 inch below RM 800 ? or around when price reduce to RM800 ?
|
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 06:43 PM
|
|
Elite
8,711 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0154sec
0.36
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 05:07 AM |