Bring MPV and trolley there.
SVS subwoofer, How many users here? Just courious
SVS subwoofer, How many users here? Just courious
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 11:01 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,569 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
Of course cash n carry. That's taukeh's preferred deal method.
Bring MPV and trolley there. |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 11:07 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,353 posts Joined: Jun 2008 From: D'Pearl of d'Orient |
I tot u guys said sealed subs better? y everyone going for the ported PC12/13+??
Added on August 19, 2009, 11:07 amshouldn't u guys go for SB13+ ? This post has been edited by ronnt88: Aug 19 2009, 11:07 AM |
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 11:08 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,569 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
PC is cheap for peasant like me
Can not afford sealed sub. This post has been edited by ronaldjoe: Aug 19 2009, 11:09 AM |
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 11:09 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
14,193 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Sbn / KL |
What I can say as for now is that the stock might be limited. As the second shipment would be in October itself.
Cash and carry would be a good idea. Don't have to bring it back. As for anything 'special' on that 1 day, I would like to reserve my comment until things are finalised. By the way, the first shipment is almost sold out |
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 11:10 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,353 posts Joined: Jun 2008 From: D'Pearl of d'Orient |
htkaki... any news on SB13+ pricing?
|
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 11:28 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
882 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 11:29 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,989 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
QUOTE(ronnt88 @ Aug 19 2009, 11:07 AM) I tot u guys said sealed subs better? y everyone going for the ported PC12/13+?? It's always the price vs performance issue. US price for SB13+ is $1249 (piano black) vs $949 for PC12+. That's a 31% difference. Means the SB13+ would be about RM7.1k here. If you choose the oak/rosenut finish price would go down to 6.9k. These are my guesses.Added on August 19, 2009, 11:07 amshouldn't u guys go for SB13+ ? So it's more expensive, but you're meant to get more accurate bass at the expense of output (i.e. it might not have the max SPL of the PC12+). Some more the PC12+ can run in sealed mode, but whether that is as good as a true sealed sub I don't know. Of course the one advantage you cannot ignore is the SB13+ is much smaller. |
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 11:33 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
882 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
QUOTE(jchong @ Aug 19 2009, 11:29 AM) It's always the price vs performance issue. US price for SB13+ is $1249 (piano black) vs $949 for PC12+. That's a 31% difference. Means the SB13+ would be about RM7.1k here. If you choose the oak/rosenut finish price would go down to 6.9k. These are my guesses. i dont know the specs of sb13+ but i think normally small and sealed subs normally u r paying for the size than performance .. u need a monster amp to push your subby in a small sealed boxSo it's more expensive, but you're meant to get more accurate bass at the expense of output (i.e. it might not have the max SPL of the PC12+). Some more the PC12+ can run in sealed mode, but whether that is as good as a true sealed sub I don't know. Of course the one advantage you cannot ignore is the SB13+ is much smaller. |
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 11:34 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,989 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
QUOTE(mys_terious @ Aug 19 2009, 11:28 AM) All depends on how big is the room and how loud you play movies. If you play loud (like some fellas in US who play at reference level) then a sealed sub would not be able to keep up with a ported sub.Still waiting for the chance one day to hear one of the SVS subs at my usual listening levels. Anybody in Klang Valley side wanna invite me |
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 11:34 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,353 posts Joined: Jun 2008 From: D'Pearl of d'Orient |
ic... so sealed subs r more for tights in music & ported more for oomphs in movies...
|
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 11:40 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,569 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
QUOTE(jchong @ Aug 19 2009, 11:34 AM) All depends on how big is the room and how loud you play movies. If you play loud (like some fellas in US who play at reference level) then a sealed sub would not be able to keep up with a ported sub. We go visit taukeh... Still waiting for the chance one day to hear one of the SVS subs at my usual listening levels. Anybody in Klang Valley side wanna invite me |
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 11:41 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,989 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
QUOTE(mys_terious @ Aug 19 2009, 11:33 AM) i dont know the specs of sb13+ but i think normally small and sealed subs normally u r paying for the size than performance .. u need a monster amp to push your subby in a small sealed box What do you define as "performance"? If you're talking about output (i.e. quantity of bass) then yes, sealed subs fall behind. In terms of accuracy (i.e. quality of bass) sealed subs are supposed to be superior.As for amp, the SB13+ has a 1000W amp. However, it's not necessarily true that all sealed subs need a monster amp. If the driver is light and efficient a smaller amp could work too. |
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 11:42 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
882 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
QUOTE(ronnt88 @ Aug 19 2009, 11:34 AM) Yes .. there is a very general statement.. but there r sealed subs that can go respectively loud and ported subs that r tight yet loud (claimed by svs 13 ultra users.. but not sure how true r they)Added on August 19, 2009, 11:45 am QUOTE(jchong @ Aug 19 2009, 11:41 AM) As for amp, the SB13+ has a 1000W amp. However, it's not necessarily true that all sealed subs need a monster amp. If the driver is light and efficient a smaller amp could work too. This post has been edited by mys_terious: Aug 19 2009, 11:45 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 11:46 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,989 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
QUOTE(ronnt88 @ Aug 19 2009, 11:34 AM) In general this seems to be the thinking. But like I said there are other factors to take into account and it is possible for a sealed sub to be good in movies too (e.g. the Submersive).Added on August 19, 2009, 11:48 am QUOTE(mys_terious @ Aug 19 2009, 11:42 AM) 370W. Apparently it has a light and efficient driver.This post has been edited by jchong: Aug 19 2009, 11:48 AM |
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 11:49 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,353 posts Joined: Jun 2008 From: D'Pearl of d'Orient |
hmmph.. i'm more of a movie guy so... looks like PB13ultra is the best
but due to space limitation, PC13 ultra is the more practical wan |
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 11:50 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,858 posts Joined: Jan 2008 |
|
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 11:54 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,353 posts Joined: Jun 2008 From: D'Pearl of d'Orient |
|
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 11:55 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
882 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
QUOTE(jchong @ Aug 19 2009, 11:46 AM) In general this seems to be the thinking. But like I said there are other factors to take into account and it is possible for a sealed sub to be good in movies too (e.g. the Submersive). 370W? U got me there bro:) .... bro itu submersive 2 drivers in there right.. n that thing is not small.. the worst thing is the seller doesnt reply emails hahah.. just to let u guys know it is ok to spend on your sub cables but it is certainly not a must.. just get a well built 1.... read http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread....=759877&page=54 last post of that page... Mark Seaton uses only usd27 for 25' cableAdded on August 19, 2009, 11:48 am 370W. Apparently it has a light and efficient driver. |
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 11:57 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,989 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
QUOTE(ronnt88 @ Aug 19 2009, 11:49 AM) hmmph.. i'm more of a movie guy so... looks like PB13ultra is the best Wah, how you're gonna hide that PC13 Ultra? Your lounge now so nice and clean, then suddenly have this big black tube appearing but due to space limitation, PC13 ultra is the more practical wan |
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 11:58 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,353 posts Joined: Jun 2008 From: D'Pearl of d'Orient |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0364sec
0.38
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 08:02 AM |