Errr.... are u sure ka?

Cannot beat 9600GSO lar... see this: http://www.gpureview.com/show_cards.php?card1=579&card2=563

Lose to 9600GSO on mem bandwidth, pixel fill rate and texture fill rate. Coz 9600GSO is 192 bit with faster shader.

Btw, I oso ATI fan but to be fair NV drivers more stable, and more games optimized for it.

4670 performance near to 9600GSO(8800GS rebadge), but on par/beats 9600GSO at some cases with AA/AF is on.

btw, HD4600 series was meant to compete 9500 series

This post has been edited by pikacu: Sep 11 2008, 10:52 AM

Yeah..9800GT,9600GT RV770 LE is ready to cut it off?

but hd3850 already countered 9500gt. The hd4670 is really good in performance as it's on par with 9600GT and HD3870(certain game). And it doesn't even need to draws power from the PSU(this is the BEST!!).

mayb 9600gso...

Any idea of the release date and price of this card in Malaysia?

seems to out perform 9600gso with AA..hmm..otherwise it is on par and cheaper..might consider changing...hmm..since consumes less power..

This post has been edited by dafreak: Sep 11 2008, 03:46 PM

4670 can cut cost ma
3850 256bit sure higher cost
AMD use low cost card to against 9500gt
more $$ earn

Consistently kills the HD 3000 series in Call of Duty 4.

darn, reli not bad for a mainstream card, COD4 at highest details with 16xAF !!! if it's priced below RM300, it is certainly a good buy. who cares about Hybrid CF anymore?
beat the crap out of HD3850 which was ATI's higher mid-range card in previous year.

asus 4670 cooler look cool..
look like Accelero L1

i wonder how it fare against HD3870

HD4670 still loses to HD3870 performance

but take note that :

HD4670 does not use any power connector from psu, which makes upgrade PSU is not necessary

but i thought most psu's already have the connector already. even mine.

if u're buying that card and your psu doesnt even come with that connector, u're definately gonna need a psu upgrade!

i just read the anandtech review, it couldn't beat HD3870 in term of performance, but HD3870 only wins by small margin. and with AA on, HD3870 still lose to HD4670. given the fact that HD4670 consumes much less power and cost lesser, it is really a good buy
edit: consume less power, do not need pci-e connector = cap ayam PSU will be sufficient, extreme cost saving here

This post has been edited by cyew86: Sep 11 2008, 06:55 PM

here some 4670 pic:


ASUS:


GIGABYTE:


GECUBE:


MSI:


POWERCOLOR:


GAINWARD:



source: http://www.tomshardware.com/cn/450,news-450.html

This post has been edited by cwk88: Sep 11 2008, 06:55 PM

damn those cards are nice

cap ayam psu dont come with those connectors ah?

what i mean is,

lets take HD4850 as example.

u need at least ~500w PSU for ur system to run stable with HD4850,

for those who have less than 500w psu need to upgrade..

but with HD4670,

just stick with ur current PSU will do

my old one does not, poor people PSU

asus 4650 box got some printing error =.=