not sure about the beta. The final version, u can download it and trial for 30 days(nod32).

anyone has a review on all antivirus regarding False Detection?

i hv seen reviews stating some False detection in Nod32 compared with other antivirus software in previous release(b4 ver 2.0)

are there any good free antivirus around?

which antiv would u reccomend me to use? Antivir, AVG, or AVAST?

This post has been edited by rufryder: May 25 2005, 02:47 PM

erm... today i switch on my com and TADA!!!



wth is happening?? why the taskmanager liddat one? virus? i experience slow internet access leh... com abit laggy also... maybe i scaning com using AVG?? i need help

avg would be a good choice for free antivirus

double click task manager.

thanks acedriver... i realise it wasnt a virus after all... lol... false alarm...

i tried both nod32 and kaspersky on a pc spec P3 550 with 384MB sd ram...

look like kaspersky taking more resource than nod32, but the detection kaspersky is better then nod32.

but now i still using nod32 in a P4 2800 with 512MB ddr ram, kaspersky in my pc still work very well, wonder which one is better... em...

eTrust is CA - Computer Association...It used to create alot of good software....

sama dengan inoculte IT kah?

same here, i am using nod32 on my office pc(P3with 192mb ram), and kaspersky on my P4.(1gb ram). Still wondering why nod32 can scan so fast than other antivirus.well, so far, nod32 2.5 works fine for me in my office.

i hv jst switch to kaspersky from Bitdeffender.(for my home pc)

Bitdeffender, in general is good, but sometimes its uses much resources to do the real time scan, for example, when double clicking My Computer, i can feel the lag. First i tot was my hardisk failing, after some test and removing bit defender, the lag was gone.

Install Kaspersky after that. Kaspersky looks fine, there is some lag, but not as lag as bitdeffender or Norton antivirus 2005(i used the trial version of Norton2005). But becareful of the detection rate, a detection rate of 100% doesnt mean the antivirus is good, we still hv to becareful about false detection(which the antivirus might be mistaken and deletes some of ur crucial files).

Bitdeffender has one of the best engine and thats why there is a software which combines both bitdeffender and kaspersky engines together.(well,bitdeffender maybe will lag my system, not sure about other user).

well, there might be a trade off between system resources and prevention+detection rates.

my question is, anyone try this b4?

(G Data AntiVirusKit 2005 (AVK)
http://antivirus.about.com/cs/beforeyoubuy/tp/aatpavwin.htm

System requirements:
Pentium, 64 MB RAM, Win 98SE, ME, XP or 2000, CD-ROM
An Internet connection is required for online updates and AVK InternetAmbulance.

never heard of G data before, wat country it dari?

http://www.antivirus-gold.com/
beware of this
the antivirus is the virus itself
my friend's pc was infected by it
can someone verify that?

This post has been edited by DeathWing: May 26 2005, 02:41 PM

nod32 2.5 should be very good comparing with kaspersky 5 personal pro...

nod32 2.5 can detect registry rickware or spyware that kaspersky cannot do... lolz! but kaspersky still the good anti virus that i check from other forum.

well, i am using nod32 2.5. Still evaluating it. Previous versions of nod32 is not very good at cleaning virus. I have some pcs keep poping out the virus alert and request for quaranttine or delete coz it cant clean it. Hope this 2.5 hv some inprovement.

nod32 2.5 can detech those memory riskware, not bad! and can detect riskware like kaspersky, so far so good lor.

Eh guys..wanna ask..why whenever i wanna update my avg , it goes to the C drive / D drive to find the update..? how do i change it to find the update on the internet?

no one talk about panda???

panda deleted all my FTP program
serv-U

panda sux!

well, i did install trial panda platinum edition 2005 on my P3 pc few months ago, uninstall it after few days. It claims to be very low in resources usage.

the main problem is not stable for my windows 98SE. It also slow down my pc performance.(using P3 with 192 ram + Windows 98SE)

Well, haven tested it on any WinXP based pc, maybe it will work fine on WinXP.