The guys at Wilders found a few problems with the test and calculations.
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=77033
Official Anti-Virus Thread, General antivirus discussion
|
|
 Apr 25 2005, 12:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
VIP
16,825 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Siberia 
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
May 25 2005, 09:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
VIP
16,825 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Siberia
|
QUOTE(rufryder @ May 25 2005, 08:37 AM) where can i get the Nod32 beta v2.5? because the beta has expired, final version is out..nvm ive found it  but ive got a probem...whenever i want to update my nod32, it keeps on prompting me for my username and password. and i keep on typing it in. but it doesnt work. anybody knows what the problem is?  |
|
|
May 25 2005, 05:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
VIP
16,825 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Siberia
|
QUOTE(newbie2 @ May 25 2005, 04:20 PM) erm... today i switch on my com and TADA!!! double click task manager. wth is happening?? why the taskmanager liddat one? virus? i experience slow internet access leh... com abit laggy also... maybe i scaning com using AVG?? i need help |
|
|
Jun 6 2005, 09:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
VIP
16,825 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Siberia
|
If resource and memory are your main concern, do try F-Prot
|
|
|
Jul 11 2005, 12:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
VIP
16,825 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Siberia
|
read this for NOD32 extra setting, http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=37509
|
|
|
Dec 22 2005, 02:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
VIP
16,825 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Siberia
|
Symantec Antivirus Heap Overflow Advisory
Security researcher Alex Wheeler has released an advisory that could potentially affect a large portion of Symantec's antivirus products including gateway, server, and client versions on most platforms. The flaw occurs during the decompression process when scanning RAR files. During this process the affected systems can experience multiple heap overflows allowing attackers complete control of the system(s). This flaw can be exploited remotely and without any user interaction through protocols such as SMTP. Wheeler warns that in default configurations users are likely vulnerable regardless of whether they choose to open or read an infected e-mail. Wheeler also recommends disabling scanning of RAR files until this vulnerability is fixed. Symantec Antivirus Heap Overflow Advisory Ouch, bad flaw. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 11 2006, 09:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
VIP
16,825 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Siberia
|
QUOTE(norazwan79 @ Jan 8 2006, 11:41 PM) so what antivirus software acceptable for winxp64? avast!NOD32 Symantec Antivirus This post has been edited by fariz: Jan 11 2006, 11:39 AM |
|
|
Jan 29 2006, 06:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
VIP
16,825 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Siberia
|
QUOTE(ioriamd @ Jan 28 2006, 09:12 PM) i m uysing win ME.. which version of NOD or Kaspersky suits me? there's NOD32 for ME, you can try thator any av thats better for win ME.. http://www.nod32.com/download/trial.htm |
|
|
Mar 15 2006, 12:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
VIP
16,825 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Siberia
|
threads merged
|
|
|
Apr 17 2006, 01:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
VIP
16,825 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Siberia
|
QUOTE(badutman @ Apr 17 2006, 11:51 AM) my own study: you can change this.. mine is set to hourly1. kaspersky AV is updated "hourly" vs NOD32 "as needed". QUOTE NOD32 AV + kerio PF: only nod32kui + nod32krn are needed to run at the background.nod32kui 912 nod32krn 4962 nod32 20120 (kerio around 5xxx) total = ~31k QUOTE imho, its not how good is any AV/PF out there, but how good are u utilize+manipulate it to serve u. agreed.If I want a lean antivirus, I would use F-Prot. For now, I'm satisfied with NOD32 |
|
|
Apr 20 2006, 09:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
VIP
16,825 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Siberia
|
QUOTE(kerossac @ Apr 20 2006, 08:56 PM) why so many ppl said that symantec bad? i used norton antivirus 2005 SE before it does its works so far so good. NAV is not bad..but there're other better products.. even Symantec Antivirus; which is different product from the same company; is better..can download at pack.google.com |
|
|
Aug 11 2006, 03:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
VIP
16,825 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Siberia
|
QUOTE(GameSky @ Aug 11 2006, 03:41 PM) hmm o_O: http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=324245http://www.activevirusshield.com/antivirus/freeav/index.adp found it when surf the net  edit: powered by Kaspersky...free [from the text there...I havent try it] |
|
|
Oct 9 2006, 06:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
VIP
16,825 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Siberia
|
QUOTE(super macgyver @ Oct 9 2006, 06:25 PM) i still prefer kapersky but wat is proactive anyway? http://www.kaspersky.com/faq?chapter=186527672&qid=187204554http://www.kaspersky.com/faq?chapter=186527672&qid=186542913 |
| Change to: |  0.0241sec
 0.42
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 03:18 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.