mayb u didnt apply the thermal paste correctly?or mounting din masuk habis?

wah cannot fit on p45 dk+

i was thinking to grab one..

lol..lucky i bought ocz vendetta 2

oh luckily i din overclock it yet...

the mounting i will take pics of it when my camera comes back.

i apply the thermal paste on the gap between the heatpipes, then put also put two thin lines on two sides of the cpu.... dunno wrong or not... noob here...

bro could be your push pin too.. try checking whether all 4 pins are inserted properly or not... press it down with a lil force to ensure its perfectly fitted in...

dont worry bro..... its normal for quaddies to get that temp on idle..... more likely if u are in non-aircondioned environment....refer to this thread if u want

http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/773477/+420

thanks bro...

had just noticed that my idle temp and load temp almost the same... load temp as in after playing crysis and during playing crysis also the temp is around 50 to 58 celcius... maybe the software is really buggy...

thanks for the info

actually to really see the load temp is it always better to use stressing software like prime95, OCCT, Intel burn test, etc...

yeaup...i second that...and btw, the temps in coretemp and realtemp isnt so accurate...compared to the ones in bios...rite?

wel...might get one for my tpower...hope it fits

tpower i45 fit it.

btw , happy birthday

ocz vendetta 2 got review at lowyat forum???

suppose to be almost the same... just make sure your coretemp or realtemp software is up to date

btw, happy birthday bro

yup... there is... here u go bro...

http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...991&hl=vendetta

So basically, the numbers for the C2D and C2Q reviewed here using Tjmax=100?

tot was different for each proc?

http://www.frostytech.com/permalink.cfm?NewsID=70921

according to newest frostytech Best CPU Cooler Performance - Q3 2008

ocz vendetta 2 pwned sb core-contact

erm....for my q9450 its done using 100tjmax.... the e6550 u have to ask bro ham revilo already

yup it is different....but for e8 series n q9xxx shud be 100tjmax except QX 9xxx iirc

lolz....u see terbalik liao... the one at the bottom is the winner

This post has been edited by tkh_1001: Oct 16 2008, 12:27 AM

actually im kinda confuse with the result ... from what i see is ccf is been beaten badly... kinda hard to believe

btw, i just found out that the result is from another website... http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.php?opti...d=203&Itemid=62

it seems like CCF is not even tested in that review... the test products includes:
*Cooler Master Geminii S (RR-CCH-PBJ1-GP)
*Cooler Master V8 (RR-UV8-XBU1-GP)
*Coolink Silentator
*Evercool Transformer 6 (HPI-12025)
*OCZ Gladiator Max (OCZTGLADM)
*Thermaltake V14 Pro (CL-P0471)
*Vantec AeroFlow FX 120 (VAF-1225)
*Xigmatek Apache XP-CD901
*Xigmatek HDT-S1284
*Zalman CNPS9300 AT
*Zaward Gyre (ZCJ010)

This post has been edited by ham_revilo: Oct 16 2008, 02:11 AM

That chart isn't it temperature rise over ambient? The lower the better right? I thought the Gyre is a good HSF? @@

:Dhaha
before that, frostl tech said CCF beat Xigmatek kau kau
now, it don't even can take the same thing down.
funny ey?

Something sounds fishy. let me wonder if this is a "paid review" site or what

Hmm, the reviews by LYN here also shows that CCF beats them. But in that review..different story pulak ._.