Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
8 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 D40/x/D60 Thread V4, The saga continues...

views
     
darthbaboon
post Sep 3 2008, 01:20 PM

Dark Lord of the Sith
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Tatooine


QUOTE(zio @ Sep 3 2008, 01:13 PM)
At US$700, it is pricey. More than double the price of the current f1.4.

Might as well use the US$700 to secure a 2nd hand D80. tongue.gif More AF points, can use older lenses tongue.gif
*
Here's the link : http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/10/new-niko...-september.aspx

EURO 650 (Around 600 - 700 USD)

Unless the new lens is something revolutionary, otherwise just get a motor-in-body camera and buy the older but very much cheaper 50 f1.4. Btw, the Sigma version is RM 1,850.

So the Nikon would prolly cost the same as the Sigma... shakehead.gif

IMO, a stupid HSM/AF-S isn't worth the extra RM 1k.

darthbaboon
post Sep 3 2008, 01:25 PM

Dark Lord of the Sith
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Tatooine


QUOTE(zio @ Sep 3 2008, 01:24 PM)
If the Sigma is RM1850 then most likely the Nikkor version will burst the RM2k range.

Which means, expensive alert!

On an unrelated note, was shooting Hanoi with the 105mm and wow, shooting with a prime is so much more challenging and satisfying.
*
Pics or it didn't happen! tongue.gif

Oh yeah hor... you're back di!! How was it? Beautiful (Both gals and scenery)? tongue.gif

This post has been edited by darthbaboon: Sep 3 2008, 01:26 PM
darthbaboon
post Sep 3 2008, 01:30 PM

Dark Lord of the Sith
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Tatooine


QUOTE(zio @ Sep 3 2008, 01:28 PM)
Lol it was hot. Haven't even load the pics into the computer tongue.gif Then its going to be a long, long process of sorting, cropping, watermarking.. zzzz tongue.gif
*
*Hot* meaning temperature burning hand hot or *Hot* as in make you sweat and salivate hot? tongue.gif
darthbaboon
post Sep 3 2008, 01:40 PM

Dark Lord of the Sith
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Tatooine


QUOTE(pangping1510 @ Sep 3 2008, 01:38 PM)
d40 was released end of 2006..will there be any new model for nikon entry dslr similar to d40?
*
It's called the D60. ;p

The D40X has already stopped production I believe, and the D40 will too at the end of this year. I believe Nikon will move for the D60 to take over the D40's market.

It'll prolly look something like this :

D60 => D80 => D90 => D300 => D700 => D3 => D3X
darthbaboon
post Sep 3 2008, 10:06 PM

Dark Lord of the Sith
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Tatooine


QUOTE(mindkiller6610 @ Sep 3 2008, 09:34 PM)
zio, kenrockwell says the 105mm VR has some serious focus breathing issue,
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/105vr.htm#breathing

is it true ??
*
Man these technical terms.... doh.gif
darthbaboon
post Sep 3 2008, 10:30 PM

Dark Lord of the Sith
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Tatooine


I wonder what other new releases will we see from Third Party Lens manufacturers come Photokina... what with Nikon releasing so many new bodies, lenses, and Canon/Sony pretty much doing the same as well.
darthbaboon
post Sep 5 2008, 03:36 PM

Dark Lord of the Sith
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Tatooine


QUOTE(mizivincible @ Sep 5 2008, 03:28 PM)
Would like to know, what is the best bang for buck for all around AF-S lens for D40/D60 ?

Or budget Macro/Potrait lens ?
*
Swt.... to be honest, a prosumer camera with a super 18x zoom lets you do everything in one.

But since you ask, you can get the 18-200mm f3.5-5.6 VR... cover everything from wide angle to telephoto.

If you want a Macro lens that can be used for portrait as well, get the Tamron SP90, now released with built-in AF motor too.
darthbaboon
post Sep 5 2008, 03:44 PM

Dark Lord of the Sith
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Tatooine


QUOTE(zio @ Sep 5 2008, 03:38 PM)
bang for buck = 18-200mm. Everything you need in one neat lil package. Other than fixed aperture of course.

Macro/Portrait would be Tamron SP90 (since ada motor already) or save up for the Nikkor 105mm smile.gif
*
Today is beginning to get very weird for me.... seem to be posting along the same lines of what everyone else does... talk about ultra deja vu. hmm.gif
darthbaboon
post Sep 5 2008, 04:20 PM

Dark Lord of the Sith
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Tatooine


Just went through my collection and pulled out this one... fisheye effect to the ultraness... MF on the D40/X/60, but just set to focus infinity and shoot...

Kinda makes my head spin when I see it.... tongue.gif

user posted image

This post has been edited by darthbaboon: Sep 5 2008, 04:21 PM
darthbaboon
post Sep 6 2008, 09:37 AM

Dark Lord of the Sith
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Tatooine


QUOTE(FESEM @ Sep 6 2008, 09:32 AM)
boss, can share how u take those photos ar?
it seems very interesting~~~ thx smile.gif
*
Tilt-shift lens perhaps? Hmmm... not sure. Interesting shots though.
darthbaboon
post Sep 6 2008, 09:21 PM

Dark Lord of the Sith
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Tatooine


QUOTE(zio @ Sep 6 2008, 07:08 PM)
it moved after I took 3 shots I think. Guess he was stunned the first time I blinded it with the flash tongue.gif
*
LOL... very good explanation indeed!

Gone through your uploaded pics and very impressed with how you managed to use the 105 for scenic shots as well. For such a tele range, you definitely composed your shots very well.

As for the macro... dun need to say la... you are the macro sifu... keng as always! notworthy.gif
darthbaboon
post Sep 7 2008, 03:03 PM

Dark Lord of the Sith
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Tatooine


QUOTE(ebernie @ Sep 7 2008, 02:21 PM)
Aisey, both lenses serve different purpose. So I guess you tend to shoot portraits more?

Anyway, I love all my lenses - 18-200mm, 10-20mm and 30mm.

Here's street shooting with all 3 lenses:
18-200mm
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
This one gets my vote. =D
darthbaboon
post Sep 8 2008, 02:44 PM

Dark Lord of the Sith
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Tatooine


QUOTE(zio @ Sep 8 2008, 02:32 PM)
For people wondering if D40 and 105mm is good enough for a trip:

*
Just an observation... Vietnam is always facing east so wouldn't the sun set behind ya towards the mountains instead of over the sea? hmm.gif
darthbaboon
post Sep 12 2008, 08:39 AM

Dark Lord of the Sith
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Tatooine


QUOTE(ebernie @ Sep 11 2008, 11:50 PM)
Well, yeah, they didn't have what we have today. But it still does not change the fact that the photos looks much better than what we churn out by the dozens everyday.

What's better? Frankly, I think it's the attention to detail, the thought that is put into each photo, the planning that goes into each of them. Sometimes it's the fact that they were brave enough to be there to take pictures (world war pictures for example). But ultimately I think it was because each photo had a story to tell, and they told the story really well. But really, I can't do justice explaining the pictures. Heck, I can't even remember the names of all the photographers I think highly off.
It's not really a fair comparison there.

Firstly, if you were a photographer *then*, it meant that your career somehow revolved around photography. Cameras were expensive and not widespread then. Cameras are so affordable *now* and having a DSLR camera in your hand *now* doesn't mean that you are a career photographer.

Secondly, you are comparing works of career photographers *then* to amaturish works that are all over *now*, for example to those posted in this forum. A right approach would be to compare what career photographers took *then* to what professional career photographers take *now*, not with LYN photographers. Who says career photographers *now* don't travel the world - to the furthest regions of the antartica, to the war torn African countries... you see those pictures still, just don't expect to find them here unless there's a Thom Hogan hiding among us somewhere. tongue.gif

Anyway, don't be so critical of LYN photogs. Even the photos we see in newspapers nowadays are crap, but they serve their purpose as an illustration. At the end of the day, everyone shoots what he/she enjoys.

Don't put a stigma that "shooting photos of models/girls are wrong"... look at shinchan and lotso's works - they shoot good model photos and are really out to improve their craft.


darthbaboon
post Sep 12 2008, 09:27 AM

Dark Lord of the Sith
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Tatooine


QUOTE(kanz1986 @ Sep 12 2008, 09:22 AM)
drool.gif  drool.gif  drool.gif  drool.gif  drool.gif

im soooo gonna get a sb800 ! ! ! btw guys, do ya think its better to get a sb800/sb900 ?..
*
If you have the budget and know how to fully utilize the functions and features of the SB-900, of course go for it! Just don't buy the SB-900 and use it as a self-defense weapon.

Hmmm... it actually might work... blinding the pursuers or potential burglars! tongue.gif
darthbaboon
post Sep 12 2008, 02:29 PM

Dark Lord of the Sith
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Tatooine


QUOTE(zio @ Sep 12 2008, 01:02 PM)
Thanks smile.gif
Woot i got a compliment. Terima kasih. I don't mind another 105mm lens wahahaha biggrin.gif
Ooo the motor apek? Hrmm true. Would this have been a better photo to express the motorcycle-cabs?
user posted image

Hrmm I notice that Flickr has been degrading my pics whenever they resize it to 800. Should I do it myself and then upload to Flickr?
*
You mean you actually upload the full 6mp photo on flickr? Or do you resize it?
darthbaboon
post Sep 12 2008, 02:34 PM

Dark Lord of the Sith
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Tatooine


QUOTE(zio @ Sep 12 2008, 02:30 PM)
@mindkiller I believe it is called Fractilius or something like that smile.gif There is also another Flood filter, where everything looks like its flooded. Quite cool.


Added on September 12, 2008, 2:31 pm

I upload the original file to Flickr but using the Flickr Uploader for PC, I can choose to resize it to 800 pixels. I noticed that I get some smearing at times. sad.gif
*
Hmmm... I usually resize and tag it myself before uploading. Can't trust those ragtag stuff. tongue.gif
darthbaboon
post Sep 12 2008, 08:17 PM

Dark Lord of the Sith
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Tatooine


QUOTE(Joseph Hahn @ Sep 12 2008, 06:44 PM)
p/s: Have you found out where D300 ISO button is ?
*
This what you're looking for? (Image from dpreview)

user posted image
darthbaboon
post Sep 13 2008, 05:21 PM

Dark Lord of the Sith
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Tatooine


QUOTE(zio @ Sep 13 2008, 04:54 PM)
18-105mm VR smile.gif
*
You forgot to add f3.5-5.6. tongue.gif

And yes I am seriously considering switching to the D90 (I'd still like the D300 though), although the priority right now is to provide for my upcoming baby and wife. Photography gear upgrades take second priority.
darthbaboon
post Sep 13 2008, 10:59 PM

Dark Lord of the Sith
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Tatooine


QUOTE(ebernie @ Sep 13 2008, 06:45 PM)
Yeah, it's the 18-105VR f3.5-5.6. It's a good starter lens (replacing the 18-135 methinks).

I've ignored the D40x and D60 and will continue to ignore this D60 special edition lol. But I bet their target buyers are new DSLR users, not us.

Oh, congrats on your baby, Darthbaboon. A good time to have a DSLR for you then.
*
Thanks mate... not out yet still waiting. tongue.gif

Are you considering upgrading too? What would be your motivation or reason for upgrading?

8 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0393sec    0.90    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 01:23 PM