Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

337 Pages « < 95 96 97 98 99 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Household [Home Appliances] Washing Machine

views
     
ozak
post Oct 8 2014, 09:46 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
17,018 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


QUOTE(JunJun04035 @ Oct 8 2014, 08:12 AM)
Used to think like that, yet in the end the SA tell me buy a normal sized one, so it's cheaper, yet run it more often.
Used to run WM every two days, now run everyday.
Still save on water usage tho  drool.gif
*
It is not just water usage. The most expensive is electric.

Everyday run cost more. Bigger capacity reduce frequency wash. And you can wash comforter and bigger item. This also help on ROI.
silver88
post Oct 8 2014, 10:01 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
201 posts

Joined: Jul 2014


QUOTE(halcyon27 @ Oct 7 2014, 09:58 AM)
You won't regret a Hitachi Big Drum front loader. Clothes washing wise, it fills the tub with water first to rinse then the it fills water into the soap dispenser. The wash comes out softer and dryer (lesser residual moisture). The added bonus is tub clean program.

The spin even at 67dB is not even a muffled air plane whine. It's more like low pitch 'mmmm' kind of sound that's not noticeable unless you're within 6ft in front. One of my favourite use is when coming back from overseas and then doing 3 loads in 45 mins using 15min quick wash and then drying everything up. All done within 1 hour.

If you use hot wash 60-90deg yes it will consume more energy for water heating. Most of my washes are at 40 degrees. But if cold wash then it avoids that but at the cost of a longer wash cycle. The inverter motor is quite up to task.
*
Thanks for ur info bro
halcyon27
post Oct 8 2014, 02:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,140 posts

Joined: Nov 2010


QUOTE(supersound @ Oct 8 2014, 09:15 AM)
Certain things we can control but certain things we can't. Like controlling what a family wearing is not possible but buying a "worker" is possible.
I won't let a worker control what I like to do.
*
Agree on principle. It has to suit to one household and not the other way round.

However the imbalanced spin issue is now a thing of the past with newer FL anti vibration and load balancing tech:
LG calls it TrueBalance Anti Vibration System
Hitachi calls it 4 or 5 ply Load Balancer
Samsung calls it Vibration Reduction Technology (VRT)

Panasonic is more of a load balance sensor and will avoid "destructive" types out of balance conditions. Some users may experience washer not spinning issues or spin at lower speeds. Bathmats are suspects.

This post has been edited by halcyon27: Oct 8 2014, 02:16 PM
SUSsupersound
post Oct 8 2014, 02:16 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(halcyon27 @ Oct 8 2014, 02:09 PM)
Agree on principle. It has to suit to one household and not the other way round.

However the imbalanced spin issue is now a thing of the past with newer FL anti vibration and load balancing tech:
LG calls it TrueBalance Anti Vibration System
Hitachi calls it 4 or 5 ply Load Balancer
Samsung calls it Vibration Reduction Technology (VRT)

Panasonic is more of a load balance sensor and will avoid "destructive" types out of balance. Some users may experience washer not spinning issues or spin at lower speeds. Bathmats are suspects.
*
Yesterday spent some extra time on looking at how a FL spin, with 1KG load, 3KG load.
It is dropping all the time at 10° from top, low load it is still ok.
But when on higher load, it is dropping to the bottom laundry. The load all the time at the bottom, which is a stress to the motor, this can explain why a top loader can last long even washing on max load all the time comparing to a front loader.
Noise level also changed from low load to high load.
halcyon27
post Oct 8 2014, 02:20 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,140 posts

Joined: Nov 2010


QUOTE(supersound @ Oct 8 2014, 02:16 PM)
Yesterday spent some extra time on looking at how a FL spin, with 1KG load, 3KG load.
It is dropping all the time at 10° from top, low load it is still ok.
But when on higher load, it is dropping to the bottom laundry. The load all the time at the bottom, which is a stress to the motor, this can explain why a top loader can last long even washing on max load all the time comparing to a front loader.
Noise level also changed from low load to high load.
*
That to me is a thing of the past with what I mentioned. On old front load washers yes the stress is there. Even in newer front load washer, the load will still imbalance but the destructive effect is negated by the load balancing tech built into it.
SUSsupersound
post Oct 8 2014, 02:25 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(halcyon27 @ Oct 8 2014, 02:20 PM)
That to me is a thing of the past with what I mentioned. On old front load washers yes the stress is there. Even in newer front load washer, the load will still imbalance but the destructive effect is negated by the load balancing tech built into it.
*
In some sense yes. But then those counter measures can help in the beginning but not after few years. Most of the time they are using rubber.
The only way is still make it stick to the tube for equal load.
When talk about equal load, my top loader already lost this, so when washing bedsheet it tends to stick on 1 side causing it to rinse and rinse only and can't spin. Again, this only happen to me after 8 years. rm1000-1100 used for 8 years consider very good already. I just need to spend another rm200-300 to change some parts and I can move on.
SUSkimsim
post Oct 8 2014, 02:30 PM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


QUOTE(supersound @ Oct 8 2014, 02:16 PM)
Yesterday spent some extra time on looking at how a FL spin, with 1KG load, 3KG load.
It is dropping all the time at 10° from top, low load it is still ok.
But when on higher load, it is dropping to the bottom laundry. The load all the time at the bottom, which is a stress to the motor, this can explain why a top loader can last long even washing on max load all the time comparing to a front loader.
Noise level also changed from low load to high load.
*
Which model do you had now?
halcyon27
post Oct 8 2014, 02:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,140 posts

Joined: Nov 2010


QUOTE(supersound @ Oct 8 2014, 02:25 PM)
In some sense yes. But then those counter measures can help in the beginning but not after few years. Most of the time they are using rubber.
The only way is still make it stick to the tube for equal load.
When talk about equal load, my top loader already lost this, so when washing bedsheet it tends to stick on 1 side causing it to rinse and rinse only and can't spin. Again, this only happen to me after 8 years. rm1000-1100 used for 8 years consider very good already. I just need to spend another rm200-300 to change some parts and I can move on.
*
Well, it's hard to configure any washing machine to spin counter to what the law of physics has decreed in terms centrifugal and centripetal force. I expect that on either top and front load. I think it would be useful to share how one even out the out of balance loads. For duvet or blankets, there's a technique illustrated in some Jap WM manuals.

This post has been edited by halcyon27: Oct 8 2014, 02:37 PM
SUSsupersound
post Oct 8 2014, 03:33 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(halcyon27 @ Oct 8 2014, 02:37 PM)
Well, it's hard to configure any washing machine to spin counter to what the law of physics has decreed in terms centrifugal and centripetal force. I expect that on either top and front load. I think it would be useful to share how one even out the out of balance loads. For duvet or blankets, there's a technique illustrated in some Jap WM manuals.
*
Well, that's why a top loader can last very long compare to front loader, because TL follow physic's law while front loader going against it.
Spinning either vertically or horizontally with load well distributed having lesser stress.
halcyon27
post Oct 8 2014, 04:24 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,140 posts

Joined: Nov 2010


QUOTE(supersound @ Oct 8 2014, 03:33 PM)
Well, that's why a top loader can last very long compare to front loader, because TL follow physic's law while front loader going against it.
Spinning either vertically or horizontally with load well distributed having lesser stress.
*
Yes, for the front loader, the suspension will wear out first. Interesting read here.
SUSsupersound
post Oct 9 2014, 01:00 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(kimsim @ Oct 8 2014, 02:30 PM)
Which model do you had now?
*
wf-b1061
SUSsupersound
post Oct 9 2014, 01:00 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(kimsim @ Oct 8 2014, 02:30 PM)
Which model do you had now?
*
wf-b1061
SUSkimsim
post Oct 9 2014, 05:39 AM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


QUOTE(supersound @ Oct 9 2014, 01:00 AM)
wf-b1061
*
Look like Samsung is another durable brand. rclxms.gif
JunJun04035
post Oct 9 2014, 08:35 AM

Sir Kalahari, Duke of Autocorrect
******
Senior Member
1,167 posts

Joined: May 2009


QUOTE(ozak @ Oct 8 2014, 09:46 AM)
It is not just water usage. The most expensive is electric.

Everyday run cost more. Bigger capacity reduce frequency wash. And you can wash comforter and bigger item. This also help on ROI.
*
Doesnt effect much tho on running the WM, my guess is electric motor do have very great efficiency. (comparing full load two day once vs half load everyday)


SUSsupersound
post Oct 9 2014, 09:24 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(kimsim @ Oct 9 2014, 05:39 AM)
Look like Samsung is another durable brand. rclxms.gif
*
Indeed yes, 2 years of usage generating > 90dB of noise and dance every now and then.
SUSkimsim
post Oct 9 2014, 09:28 AM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


QUOTE(supersound @ Oct 9 2014, 09:24 AM)
Indeed yes, 2 years of usage generating > 90dB of noise and dance every now and then.
*
Around 6kg and without VRT & inverter motor as well.. Nothing much can be done in perfectly
SUSsupersound
post Oct 9 2014, 09:54 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(kimsim @ Oct 9 2014, 09:28 AM)
Around 6kg and without VRT & inverter motor as well.. Nothing much can be done in perfectly
*
Actual load only 5KG, over rated.
Kimchis never do some good, except making holes in our wallet with their low quality stuffs.
halcyon27
post Oct 9 2014, 10:56 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,140 posts

Joined: Nov 2010


QUOTE(supersound @ Oct 9 2014, 09:54 AM)
Actual load only 5KG, over rated.
Kimchis never do some good, except making holes in our wallet with their low quality stuffs.
*
Is this the one you mentioned used in the villa? If it is I think it's very very well utilized. Based on that post, if I read it correctly, it's doing 8 years use in 1 year due to the amount of washes.
SUSkimsim
post Oct 9 2014, 11:43 AM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


QUOTE(halcyon27 @ Oct 9 2014, 10:56 AM)
Is this the one you mentioned used in the villa? If it is I think it's very very well utilized. Based on that post, if I read it correctly, it's doing 8 years use in 1 year due to the amount of washes.
*
But he done everyday on 3 times per day, also 5kg sometime may over load we can't measure each time when for washed.

Lower end meant like also entry level of car specs wise very simple and basic only... Nothing much can be aspected.

This post has been edited by kimsim: Oct 9 2014, 11:45 AM
SUSsupersound
post Oct 9 2014, 11:45 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(halcyon27 @ Oct 9 2014, 10:56 AM)
Is this the one you mentioned used in the villa? If it is I think it's very very well utilized. Based on that post, if I read it correctly, it's doing 8 years use in 1 year due to the amount of washes.
*
Sorry, 8 years is my Hitachi top loader, this front loader only used for 2 years. Well utilized? Reliable? For kimchi brand, I think it is very good already. But when comparing together with the brand that designed by people which made Pearl Harbor as scrap yard, it is rubbish whistling.gif

337 Pages « < 95 96 97 98 99 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0227sec    0.36    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 09:06 AM