QUOTE(Mov_freak @ Oct 21 2015, 12:12 PM)
I watched them in numerical sequence (1,2,3, 4...)
Interesting sequence, the way you had chosen to review the material
http://www.nomachetejuggling.com/2011/11/1...-viewing-order/Interesting sequence, the way you had chosen to review the material
Because back then, for audiences in 1980 who watched II (Empire Strikes Back) for the first time, the revelation of Vader was a big thing.
So to preserve the surprise factor, this alternate viewing order is proposed for new viewers.
A quote from the website:
"The prequel backstory comes at the perfect time, because Empire Strikes Back ends on a huge cliffhanger. Han is in carbonite, V is L's xxxxx, and the Empire has hit the rebellion hard. Delaying the resolution of this cliffhanger makes it all the more satisfying when Return of the Jedi is watched."
QUOTE(Mov_freak @ Oct 21 2015, 12:12 PM)
Just wanna say - I try very very hard to leave my brain at the door when approaching the I,II,III - and your analysis DOES NOT help hahaha This post has been edited by lyn_grayskale: Oct 23 2015, 10:21 AM
Oct 23 2015, 10:08 AM

Quote


0.0214sec
0.61
6 queries
GZIP Disabled