Streamlines (not really regular, depends if the dart flies straight) up to 45ft

i want to lelong my RECON CS-6 (without Darts)
rarely used
complete with box..

RM65 (firm) TQ...

Just to hammer in a point.

what, still not convince by my graph? 

i didn't even see your counter argument on it. quite disappointed really. 

Your "graph" was likely drawn without even any target practise work, and i don't think anyone is taking your claims of Streamlines being accurate seriously.

Hi sis,
Sorry for the month delay, I had to actually go into town to get extra darts for this test since we all use stephans up here in Dandenong. I have decided to use a brand new Maverick for your request, so i got one as well.



For this test, I'm basically shooting at a NERF Tech-target.

The maverick is not modded, but has been broken in by firing it 120 times (should be more than enough right?) prior to the test.

A hit is a hit, and as long as the number on the tech-target moves, that's good enough to count as a "hit" to me.

I start at 2 meters, and I fire each type of dart 90 times before increasing the distance by one meter. (the chart is off by 1 meter by the way)

The darts are "test fired" so that they hit (as center as possible), and then the maverick is clamped to the side of a wall with two G-Clamps so that it is immovable, even while reloading.

I am also firing these darts in the dorm's ball, which is a large empty space, and most importantly there is no outside wind to skew results.

Results are rounded up to the nearest integer percentage.



As you can see, I spent 3 hours proving what is common knowledge. Taggers hit consistently, Micros just suck (although consistent), and Streamlines can't hit the blind side of a barn. I even recorded a 2 misses at 3 meters!

Let me know if you need anymore tests, and I'll probably record a video if i can borrow a camera.

...The Recon jammed 7 shots in a row with Taggers backstage, I wasn't about to use Taggers if the thing was going to jam.

I was basically doomed from that point on.

I'm sorry, your "chart" is an outright lie.

Zeroglyph is essentially talking rubbish.

is it modified in any way??

i direct your attention to the area within the red square.



checking at what i was arguing about, that was the whole point of my chart. shots within the minimal effective range. i'd say my chart isn't that far off. so my rubbish talk actually has validity in it.

streamline misses at 3 meters?  something seems wrong, 3 meters is just too short a range for a miss.

i must thank you though for providing a proper argument instead of just talks(although the test results is from someone else). i'd give you some respect if you were a tad polite, but i guess not.

We believe your attempts at bullshitting and saving face, oh "mister streamlines are the most accurate darts".