QUOTE(carlosandy @ Oct 6 2008, 10:52 AM)
So what to do? Since both CKF, Philip Woo and Parmindar also demand lecturer. They are also busy man, it is very difficult for them to open 2nd class. No choice lo, if want to study under them, then just follow lo.
Anyhow P3 is going to be the last paper i'm going to take at KSA. Although its easy to make friends there but I am seriously demotivated everytime i study there. I think the centre critical success factor lies on its low fees structure & veteran lecturer they possessed.Please correct me if i am wrong bcos after several sittings i have discovered a similar characteristics among majority of KSA lecturer :
1) They like to discuss about past year (how many sittings never came out, how many syllabus has not been tested)
This approach will keep the student focussed but it become too "exam orientated" : students normally pass with minimal marks.
2) They tend to be "off-focus" while teaching. I am sure most of you out there will be very familiar with the lecturer lifestyle, history, experience...etc. Its quite refreshing to hear some jokes occasionally but spend every 30 minutes of class time to do so.....sigh.
3) Since most are veteran lecturer, they tend to give out too much "practical example". This always happen in theory papers. They will spend >50% of the time giving too much emphasise on real life situation. Its perfectly fine but they tend to lose focus much on the core elements of the syllabus.
The centre itself can be considered the "air-asia" in ACCA provider. They provide "no frills" package to students (whree you only be given a chair, table & lecturer itself). Apart from that you only study,study,study....etc. In simple english, KSA is like a tuition centre. What KSA should do is to expand their centre to provide more comfortableness to students. The only reason i think they reluctant is like what happen to FTMS & Systematic (now SEGI) crumbling down without a trace.
Oct 6 2008, 12:39 PM

Quote
0.0327sec
0.46
6 queries
GZIP Disabled