I always wondered about Kurylenko's character (Camille) from the poster why she looked as if she just fell into a dumpster.

She will be back in Bond 23... yes !!

Agreed no more

Bit boring... talk too much, less action, censor a lot...

agreed

This is the post I'm looking forward to. Yes, it's supposed to be the first mission ( Casino Royale ) for Bond to be 007.

So, I think the gadgets, personality and presentation of the Bond character himself is on development. These are all excusable base on that fact. Hey at least there is the Car, the Phone, and the Girl.

Maybe in Bond23 may wrap it all up thus producing the true matured Bond.

IMHO, they trackback the Bond timeline same as Star Wars Saga trackback to episode 1 because of depletion of the attraction factor in the movie itself.

Its becoming of a ALIAS type of espionage (between organizations) from (weapons of mass destruction) type of movie.

how u know.

Bond's strength is a bit exaggerated.
Damn, he can brake the toilet's door handle just like that >_>

almost all action movie's character's strength is exaggerated...

Lol, I'm sure Bond23 will be the end of this physical bond.

Well, he doesn't have gadgets cause they dont have Q yet. That's the old mans name right? Q, the guy that supplies the gadgets.

For those who think Bond is incomplete with gadgets, you have to keep in mind that Casino Royale is considered a reboot of the Bond movie franchise, much like Batman Begins represented a new beginning for Batman movies. With this reboot, the producers wanted movies that are a little bit more grounded in reality. Fantastic gadgets will be kept to a minimum and when Bond fights, he gets cuts and bruises.

Until the producers consider another reboot, it is safe to assume that we won't see anything like the invisible car (Die Another Day) ever again.

After watching the movie, this is what i feel

Too many characters flying around, story left hanging, the end.

it's meant to be left hanging....

one way to look at the last 2 james bond movie is to understand why it is different from the rest of the james bond series:

i. it is a reboot. a reinvention and revitalization of the james bond character and its universe.

ii. QoS is the first ever sequel to another james bond movie (CR). i think i read somewhere it's supposed to be a trilogy or something (unconfirmed), but what i do know is that, QoS have already started preproduction even before CR finished filming. so it was supposed to be a tie-in.

Especially the Tamil movie. They can slap your face and you fly to Thailand from Malaysia

chinese kung fu movie also not bad wat, you can glide through from tree to tree and find your enemy...

watch it last night quite enjoying it

Watch it yesterday ... Seriously .. kinda sucks compared to Casino Royale ... The bond girl isn't as hot, no sex scene, less actions too.

Even if there are, you wont get to see shet in our cinemas..

Olga<Green..Juz to clarify sumthin here..

Truly Agreed! Bcos when I watch Casino Royale tat time...I realized there is no Q (weapons and gadgets inventer) yet.

now a days there are some movies seems like a "remake/restart" from old school movies in order to make it "new packaging" to attract youngsters/ new generation ppl.

some movies/series for example like:

Batman Begins
Kamen Rider First
Star Wars (revert back from those old school series)