Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
8 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 8 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Fund Investment Corner v2, A to Z about Fund

views
     
kparam77
post Jun 13 2012, 02:30 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
952 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(penew @ Jun 13 2012, 02:16 PM)
most likely due to 2:1 unit split for both KGF & KSGF, so NAV was adjusted to rm1 from rm3.
perhaps morningstar rating is based on NAV solely?
*
i think unit split nothing to do with rating.
kparam77
post Jun 14 2012, 11:06 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
952 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(Manufacture @ Jun 13 2012, 08:23 PM)
from what she explained at least 15% of the principal amount.. its some ING funds which could be switched every now and then. for now she placed all my funds into income funds. which from their website i still see raise most of the time? hmm.gif

about whether it is investment link or pure UT also m not quite sure. thats why m trying to get some clarification from /k members here. tongue.gif I only tried it because the returns seem to be better as compared to FD.

https://www.ing.com.my/IFBNet/2.0/ing.appli...lt/Default.aspx
*
if.....at least 15% of the principal amount...this could be the income, not the capital gain. for investment returns by capital gain is more important than income, if u want to grow ur money via investment.

example:

rm10k x 15% = RM1500.

if income, the value will be rm10k - rm1500 = rm8500

if capital gain, the value will rm10k + rm1500 = rm11500.

so, u hv decide, u want to go for income or capital gain or both. read the prospectus abt the fund objectives.


kparam77
post Jun 14 2012, 04:33 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
952 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(Manufacture @ Jun 14 2012, 12:20 PM)
dont quite understand. blink.gif
how come if it is income it reduces?  rclxub.gif

sorry quite new at this.
*
nice explanation frm pink spider.

to make it simple, whenever u get the income, your value will be reduce by the amount of income.

this is another one for u..... take note, income in UT call distribution.

Total return in UT = income distribution(if any) + Capital gain/loss.

Income Distribution VS capital gain.

The effect of income distributions if cash out.


Public SmallCap Fund.
Risk Factor : Aggressive.
Financial year : 31 August
Launch Date : 13/06/2000

If RM10,000 invested in this Fund on 13/06/2000. After the service charge, 20,000 units purchased at RM0.470 for the price RM9400.00

Current value/returns as at 01/12/2010:
Public Smallcap Fund = RM40,931.95 with market price RM0.8732 per unit.

Public SmallCap fund managed to give up to RM40,931.95 (309.31% in 11 years). with average simple return 28.12 annually.

Actual Profits = RM40,931.95 - RM10,000 = RM30,931.95

Total return = RM30,931.95 / RM10,000 X 100 = 309.31%

Average simple return 309.31% / 11 years = 28.12%

Since the distributions for RM10,000, re-invest back (Compounding interest) , Public Smallcap fund managed to give RM40,931.95 as at 01/12/2010.

tis is call capital gain over the time.



Let see what will happen if the distributions take out as CASH. (No Compounding interest to work for money)

2000 - No distribution given for Public Smallcap fund

2001 - No distribution given for Public Smallcap fund

2002 - RM0.040 given for per unit.
Total units purchased X Rm0.040
20,000 X Rm0.040 = RM800.00 (Taken out)

If the distributions taken out, the remaining units in investment are still 20,000 units.

2003 - RM0.035 given for per unit.
Remaining units X Rm0.035
20,000 X Rm0.035 = RM700.00 (Taken out)

If the distributions taken out, the remaining units in investment are still 20,000 units.

2004 - RM0.050 given for per unit.
Remaining units X Rm0.050
20,000 X Rm0.050 = RM1000.00 (Cash out)

If the distributions taken out, the remaining units in investment are still 20,000 units.

2005 - RM0.060 given for per unit.
Remaining units X Rm0.060
20,000 X Rm0.060 = RM1200.00 (Cash out)


If the distributions taken out, the remaining units in investment are still 20,000 units.

2006 - RM0.050 given for per unit.
Remaining units X Rm0.050
20,000 X Rm0.050 = RM1000.00 (Cash out)


If the distributions taken out, the remaining units in investment are still 20,000 units.

2007 - RM0.090 given for per unit.
Remaining units X Rm0.090
20,000 X Rm0.090 = RM1800.00 (Cash out)


If the distributions taken out, the remaining units in investment are still 20,000 units.


2008 - RM0.080 given for per unit.
Remaining units X Rm0.080
20,000 X Rm0.080 = RM1600.00 (Taken out)

If the distributions taken out, the remaining units in investment are still 20,000 units.

2009 - RM0.080 given for per unit.
Remaining units X Rm0.080
20,000 X Rm0.0850 = RM1600.00 (Cash out)


If the distributions taken out, the remaining units in investment are still 20,000 units.

2010 - RM0.090 given for per unit.
Remaining units X Rm0.090
20,000 X Rm0.090 = RM1800.00 (Cash out)


If the distributions taken out, the remaining units in investment are still 20,000 units.

Total incomes/distributions taken out (Cash out) are:
2002 -RM800.00 (No Compounding interest for next 8 years)
2003 - RM700.00 (No Compounding interest for next 7 years)
2004 - RM1000.00 (No Compounding interest for next 6 years)
2005 - RM1200.00 (No Compounding interest for next 5 years)
2006 - RM1000.00 (No Compounding interest for next 4 years)
2007 - RM1800.00 (No Compounding interest for next 3 years)
2008 - RM1600.00 (No Compounding interest for next 2 years)
2009 - RM1600.00 (No Compounding interest for next 1 years)
2010 - RM1800.00 (No Compounding interest for next 0 years)

Total - RM11,500.00.
If the remaining 20,000 units sell-back at RM0.8732 on 01/12/2010 = RM17,464.00
Total returns = RM11,500.00 + RM17,464.00 = RM28,964.00 only

So,
If the distributions NOT taken out and let the compounding interest work, As at 01/12/2010 the return is RM40,931.95.

If the distributions taken out, the return only = RM 28,964.00.

Diff = RM40,931.95 - RM 28,964.00 = RM11,967.95


If distributions re-invest back, the units will grow and more returns over the time if the fund perform well.

so, this is how to get high capital gain by re-invest the income over the time.


go to...... http://www.pk31-publicmutual.blogspot.com/ if u still rclxub.gif rclxub.gif


kparam77
post Jun 15 2012, 10:45 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
952 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(Manufacture @ Jun 14 2012, 10:19 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


thanks i think im starting to get better understanding on this. for now the fund which I have bought is ING income fund which i think it should be the one you guys said income distribution. my agent recommended that before election other funds seem to be unstable. so temporarily place it inside income fund first. after election will be switching to other funds which is deem suitable. anyway its only very small amount.  sweat.gif
*
normaly income funds will give income annualy. the distribution policy shud be annual income. and it will be low risk too for this fund profile.

waht is ur agent doing is lock the profit and switch to tis funds and swith back to equity fund later. i think u can trust ur agent. she is doing well. but not sure abt 15% returns as u mention before.
kparam77
post Jun 17 2012, 06:49 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
952 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(izzudrecoba @ Jun 17 2012, 11:45 AM)
High fees dampener for unit trust

By DALJIT DHESI
daljit@thestar.com.my
Unit trusts are gaining popularity among investors as an important source of investment and retirement savings. But are investors getting a fair deal from the high charges being imposed by the industry and will lower charges really mean better returns for investors?


http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?f...usiness/9729858
*
unit trust still not popular in malaysia. tis is due to no enuf education abt tis industry. ppls dont want to invest not because of high SC, its because the risk.

as an agent i hv many experiance ppls saying that, i dont know abt UT, even UT in malaysia since 1959.

yes, i agree with high SC, but who going to distribute the unit trust if SC abolise? if so, sure UTMC biz will effected. and many agent income will effect too.

kparam77
post Jun 18 2012, 12:36 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
952 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(cherroy @ Jun 17 2012, 09:52 PM)
Nobody insist no SC.
But to a more fairer system or more competitive rate.
Stock broker can survive and earn profit with earning less than 1% commission, while UT industry need >5% SC + 1~1.5 annual management fee?

Mind that stock broker won't earn a single cent when there is no transaction done aka no buying (no buy will lead to no sell, as here short is prohibited), while UT industry still earn decent 1~1.5% annual management fee even there is no new investor invested in the UT.

I believe investors do not mind to pay high SC fee for an UT that can outperform the benchmark and give a double digit return.
But the problem is, we had seen even a fund the make the investors loss 30-50%, the fund still charging the same amount of SC and annual management fee. No different with an outperform fund.
*
stock broker who managed funds still charge those fees. for direct retail and institutional sales, no those fees, brokerage good enuf profit already (buy and sales) even with 1% commision. even investor lost money need to pay the brokerage when sale back the share for lost..

is it fair for investors lost money and broker/remisiers/dealres made profits?brokerage?

if bursa malaysia daily trading volume min rm1bil. if 1 % com, how much brker made daily as brokerage? both buy and sales? is every investors take profits?

UT management fees not relate to investors. its related the fund value and UIC which hold by any investors. it not matter new or existing unit holders.

both stck and UT hs pros and cons.


kparam77
post Jun 26 2012, 02:41 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
952 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(desmond_fantasy @ Jun 26 2012, 02:08 PM)
Just wana ask, can foreigner buy unit trust?
*
who says cannot?

as long as the foreigner has valid passport, sure can.
kparam77
post Jun 26 2012, 10:31 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
952 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(myclosetstuff @ Jun 26 2012, 07:30 PM)
mr accountant, even if i am an agent, i do care of my people. i do not bullshitting people of all the bluff stories.

of course  it will have something to do with the NAV and stuff. i do know about the price before dividend. i do know about the units. i do know about the NAV. if they invest it in a long run, and get dividend every year, doesn't it reduce the average cost per year? doesn't it making profit? doesn't it increase investor's wealth?

i'm not talking in short term. investment should be from medium to long term, which is in Malaysia 3-5 years.

it is making profit. but still depends on the FUND u invested in.

i don't want to argue with you. maybe what i'm trying to xplain and what u think i'm trying to say is different. sorry for any misunderstanding and tq.
*
i think u mis understand abt distribution vs capital gain.

UT total return = capital gain + distribution(if any).

normaly distribution declare from the NAV (unit price itself), so it wont increase the wealth. capital gain is increase the wealth.


let say the unit price is rm1.00
let say u hv 10,000 units with the value rm10,000 in fund A.
let say rm0.10 declare as disrtibution.
10,000 units x rm0.10 = rm1000
so the distrintuion = rm 1000

after the distribution the unit price will be adjusted as rm1.00 - rm0.10 = rm0.90

the value after the distribution = 10,000 x rm0.90 = rm9000

if u plus the distributiom rm1000 with the fund value after the disribution rm9000 = rm10,000

meaning = UT total return = capital gain + distribution(if any).
meaning = RM10,000 = rm9000 + rm1000

back to squre, before and after the fund value is the same. so, the distribution never increase the wealth.

if the distribution re-invest back, meaning u r buying additional units (top up) with ur own distribution. so, the number of units will increase, this will by auto will reduce the cost per units/average price.

take not distribution can be decalre if the fund not perform well or not perform too. for this case eventhough the average price looks cheaper, but it must be cheaper than market price to give profits.

so, why the distribution is given? its because the fund follow the policy and not all the investor re-invest the distributions. some seek for distribution to spend. thats why the distribution were declare and those seek for re-invest, it will be re-invest accordingly without any service charge. becaue its from own money, frm own fund and from own unit price.

do not mis understand that if a fund give distribution every year, meaning it will help create weatlh, its wrong. even if every year it give distribution the fund must hv capital gain or perform well.

a fund only can give profits if the fund has capital gain from NAV at any of time. its not because of the distribution. distribution (re-invest) only help to give better cost per unit after the NAV re-adjusted. and accumulate more units.

yes, if units are accumulates becaue of the disribution re-invested, yes the invstor will get more amount as distribution, but its still not help to create more wealth.

pls visit my siggy abt how to calculate unit trust. u can correct me if i wrong.


Added on June 26, 2012, 10:56 pm
QUOTE(hafiez @ Jun 26 2012, 07:46 PM)
u received the circulation letter in assist rite? did u read the important reminder below the letter? mind to paste it here?

if tan beng wah see this, u die u know...
pink, lets share a bit.. i think i need some lights about this.

alrite here we go.

information given: RM50,000 investment. current price per unit is RM1.2828. units received after 3% SC = 37,841.97 ...

dividend announce = 7.08sen/unit. after calculation, units credited is 2,302.68, total balance on unit is = 40,144.65 ... the price dropped to RM1.1413. (the price huge difference because of market price activity and price after dividend :: dividend was given out on RM1.21 mark iinm)

ok, now the units and value are 40,144.65 @ RM1.1413 = RM 45,817.09 (= before dividend, 37,841.97 units @ RM1.2107)

now let say the current price up to RM 1.2107 again, so 40,144.65 @ RM1.2107 = RM48603.13

so, isn't this show that the "dividend" actually helped the investor to gain different which is higher value at the same price before dividend?

dont get me wrong, me too thinks that dividend cant help the investor to gain much. but for long term investor yes they can. but UT, purely about unit price appreciation gain.

i also would like to invite kparam77, MK and others to give opinions. @myclosetstuff, u too. icon_rolleyes.gif

edit: wrongly calculated amount
*
i dont do any calculation base on ur details.

waht i can C is, the gain is because the NAV gain. not becasue the distribution. u already give the gain price ( after the distribution) from rm1.1413 to rm1.2107. its a capital gain.

u cannot assume the accumulated units help u the gain, its wrong, because its ur own units/money from ur initial investment.

do you agree that if the NAV price drop more, and u agree u have more lost becasue u hv more accumulated units?



This post has been edited by kparam77: Jun 26 2012, 10:56 PM
kparam77
post Jun 27 2012, 03:03 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
952 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(transit @ Jun 26 2012, 09:10 PM)
Just my personal opinion, to me I would prefer to invest in a fund that persistently given me distribution compare to those no distribution at all.The distribution may not help in short term but it really help to lowering down the average cost per unit in LT (Long Term). I have a practical PRSF account that showing the average cost per unit has been down from RM1.0000 to RM0.2540 (Time frame is from 09/05/1994 to 01/04/2011). Most important, the accumulation of units have been increased from 1994 to 2011. Of course, you may not escape from TAX, Administrative Charges and etcs. Like what I commented before, no free lunch in this world. If a fund can given Capital Growth, why I should care about those costs? However for other example such as Public China Select Fund, it has been underwater (much behind baseline), and there is not even a single distribution given away since it's commencement. Do any one aware for PRSF in my example above, for the first commencement on 09 May 1994 to 15/04/1996 has not even have any single distribution declared for the past 3 years. From 30/04/1996 the PRSF began it's consistent distribution (annually until 2012, never missed one year in my practical records for the next 15 years) Hence if given a choice, I would still prefer to invest in those fund given distribution.
*
Let say is u hv 1kg of cake. Slice it.
500grm x 2 slices = 1 kg
250grm x 4 slices = 1kg
100grm x 10 slices = 1kg
50grm x 20 slices = 1 kg
25grm x 40 slices = 1 kg

if the cake not has been slice, 1kg remain 1 kg.

U got the point now?

kparam77
post Jun 27 2012, 05:18 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
952 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(transit @ Jun 27 2012, 04:15 PM)
kparam77, I never deny your point of view. But please respect my preference!! :-)
*
i'm sharig/trying to give better understanding only.

Let say is u hv 1kg of cake. Slice it. the price is RM1000.
1000kg = 1 slice = RM1000 , average price = RM1000
500grm x 2 slices = 1 kg , average price = RM1000 / 2 slices = RM500 per slice
250grm x 4 slices = 1kg , average price = RM1000 / 4 slices = RM250 per slice

100grm x 10 slices = 1kg , average price = RM1000 / 10 slices = RM100 per slice
50grm x 20 slices = 1 kg, average price = RM1000 / 20 slices = RM50 per slice

25grm x 40 slices = 1 kg, average price = RM1000 / 40 slices = RM25 per slice

the average price of slice get cheaper when the number of slices increase or accumulated within the limit.

let say the cake price increase rm100, meaning the value = rm1100.

rm100 / 40 slices = rm2.5,

so, every slices of cake price will increase by rm2.5, which is rm25 +rm2.5 = rm27.5 to give profits for all the slices.

sharing only.
kparam77
post Jun 28 2012, 12:07 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
952 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(Pink Spider @ Jun 27 2012, 05:22 PM)
an unit is just a DENOMINATION, it's not like more units = more "soldiers" to fight for u! laugh.gif
*
but the benefits of distribution cannot be deny also. the more units either from re-invest the distribution, top up, DDI............ can/may give more income.
http://www.pk31-tips.blogspot.com/2011/10/...unit-trust.html
kparam77
post Jun 29 2012, 10:25 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
952 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(hafiez @ Jun 29 2012, 07:11 PM)
Gua kena print 2,3 pages ni, rendam dlm sup, pastuh minum.

Makin lama makin complicated nak paham.

Start to understand few posts, come other posts. Confuse again. Hahahaha...

Pink, where r u? Can meet aa? I blanja u teh. Wakakakakka...
*
aiyo-ohhhhhhhh tak faham lagi-kah?

lu beli tembikai 1 biji = rm10.00 (average price)
kalau u jual buah itu rm11.00, dapat rm1.00 popit. (capital gain)
kalau u jual rm0.90, dapat rm9.000. rugi rm1.00 (capital lost)

faham?

ok, sekaranngggg........
potong 10 keping, jual 1 keping rm1.00 (average price)

berapa u dapat sekarang? rm10.00 kan?
kalau u simpan 9 keping (rm9.00) dan disribute (distribution) 1 keping (rm1.00), sama juga jumlah RM10.00

kalau u jual 1 keping rm1.10 ( capital gain) dapat rm11.00. rm 1 popit.
kalau u simpan 9 keping (rm9.90) dan disribute (distribution) 1 keping (rm1.10), sama juga jumlah RM11.00


kalau u jual 1 keping rm0.90 ( capital lost) dapat rm9.00. rm 1 rugi.
kalau u simpan 9 keping(rm8.10) dan disribute (distribution) 1 keping (0.90), sama juga jumlah RM9.00



sudah faham sekarang-kah?
aiyo...aiyo....mana teh tarik-ku?


kparam77
post Jun 30 2012, 11:51 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
952 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(Pink Spider @ Jun 30 2012, 10:08 AM)
When doing biz in toilet nothing better to do, so thought of that example laugh.gif

I posted at 9AM...u mean u took 1 hour to write up your post? shocking.gif  sweat.gif  notworthy.gif
*
Pink and J,

u guys shud join with me as agent brows.gif brows.gif brows.gif
kparam77
post Jun 30 2012, 12:18 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
952 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(Pink Spider @ Jun 30 2012, 11:58 AM)
eee...ekor musang unker param sudah muncul brows.gif

I may be a good consultant but not a good salesman, I blush.gif when meeting ppl doh.gif

My insurance agents also always ask me to join them tongue.gif
*
u r welcome to join consultant team... not salesman team rclxms.gif rclxms.gif
kparam77
post Jun 30 2012, 12:39 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
952 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(Pink Spider @ Jun 30 2012, 12:22 PM)
Got such thing blink.gif

Do tell more notworthy.gif
*
if u care abt ur client.. u r a consultant......
if u care abt urself... u r a salesman......

join my team as consulant cum salesman rather than salesman cum consultant.
kparam77
post Jun 30 2012, 12:56 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
952 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(Pink Spider @ Jun 30 2012, 12:43 PM)
if u care about client but u dun even hv 1 client? laugh.gif
*
no worries, if ppls know abt u, they wil come after u by refferals.
kparam77
post Jun 30 2012, 11:14 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
952 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(Pink Spider @ Jun 30 2012, 01:37 PM)
thanks for the offer but I think I've got commitments making switch to commission-based job not practical sad.gif

thx for the offer though cheers.gif
*
do u think im full timer?
kparam77
post Jul 1 2012, 05:30 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
952 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(David83 @ Jul 1 2012, 04:10 PM)
Distribution is just marketing gimmick to make the fund looks generating good return and cheaper.

It doesn't really add value to the current unitholders.
*
cannot say gimmick too.........most of the funds objective is for capital gain and generate income, if any. so, distribuions is for income.

to make it cheaper, FM has option to split the units instead of distributions.

just sharing only.
kparam77
post Jul 7 2012, 12:18 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
952 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(alexkos @ Jul 6 2012, 10:34 PM)
@Pink

erm, I mean, opening a CSD and trade shares in my own pace and my own decision, aka trade in bursa malaysia?

too dangerous for 1st-time investor like me?

Thanks for the fundsupermart info.

How about Kenanga? Same position as FSM?
*
yes, u need to open a CDS acc with any broker to buy share directly. as other forumer says be aware of the risk too. u still need to go through a remisier. so u still need to pay brokerage if u not aware on that.
kparam77
post Jul 9 2012, 07:09 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
952 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(Rich_Lim @ Jul 9 2012, 07:06 PM)
Guys, where would you recommend to open CDS account ya? Any differences between them like significantly in charges & fees?  smile.gif
*
open CDS acc to buy share or unit trust funds?

8 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 8 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0685sec    0.31    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 03:30 AM