QUOTE(cherroy @ Jun 30 2008, 10:36 AM)
Errr.... I am confused now, it is Steven's Corner or Steven's Tea Garden that we are discussing on?
Please bare with me, as I don't follow this thread closely, just look at thread title (Steven's Corner) only.
QUOTE(SKY 1809 @ Jun 30 2008, 10:44 AM)
If the intention could confuse people ( like the moderator ), then we ( the less informed group ) should be cautious about it.
Frankly speaking, certain information like how the money collected, is treated in their accounting book needed to be disclosed, and whether creative accounting approach is adopted.
But the final decision would still be yours.
well...for ur infos....why not on the world could there be two seperate registered identity??? Now things get to be interesting when silicon mentioned the distinction between the 'family brand' name and the 'line brand' name...Frankly...After the end of the day...they are 2 different identity... Well...Don't know whether I am correct but based on the case of Kleinwort Benson v Malaysia Mining Corp (1989) ...Take note that....Unless the T&C was stated...Ther family brand will not be liable for its line brand... Well... in other words, the event can be organized by the family brand and not liable by the line brand when loss occured, u can simply draw an analogy with the topic above. So no offence but if i really got to comment on it....despite the results... Then Steven corner is actually using a few protection schemes by its own.
1) Family brand oragnized an event for the interest of line brand thus anything happend goes to the family brand. one might said it is plain stupid to damage the image of family brand...well...the golden rule is...if it is worth to do so... just do it. A damaged family brand can be abolished by the corporation and new brand can be build. Well...Really no offence but the worst possibility if u guys really wanna know... the group will registered under Steven tea corner and the money which collected by the event organized by steven corner will be transfered there....steven corner closed up and no body will get caught or being liable. When it is time for check up...mosty of the time...it is too late.
2)Exclusion clause. like all the other companies policy, i dunno whether this element was being used but predictably...positive.
3)The hidden of real intention- to use the name of promotion such as prepaid to eat for 5 years like u 20 years old eat until u married...

but the intention was actually creating a MLM scheme so either to
i)clear off current debts
ii)pay off current suppliers credits
iii)shortage of cash to purchase new technology or system
iv)etc....or
v)worse come to worst- as mentioned by chatwarrior- run off with the amount of money collected.
The comment above was based on the interest of party which oposed to Steven corner
So I tried to think of the positive side of steven's corner again despite the results
They are just doing an investment and avoid the prcedure to be registered to KLSE because they wanna remain in a family business dont wish to further expand their legal structure. So this is the way but unfortunately it is not allowed in malaysia.... so they'd decided to use a promotion namely prepaid to eat is used to:
i)develop further business expansion by using the money collected in the promotion campaign.
ii)get public's attention
iii)promote steven's tea garden which is the new line brand of steven's corner.
with the objective of bringing up steven's publicity so to get loan easier in the future, advantages of putting leverage on suppliers, increase profit margin and bring down it's industrial rivals such as BRj and Genting corner...etc.
_____
but no matter how i gotto explain for steven's corner....something keep bugging my mind...so i hope silicon can explain further question for me or us:
1)we are paying RM3000 for 5 years and steven is paying us RM6k in cash and Rm3k in foods. forget about the RM3k. 20k places of membership will pay steven RM60,000,000(rm60m) they plan to get 100 outlets. well...so the tricky part is here.
100 outlets and few outlets u mentioned -rental fee is about RM30k a month or maybe more. steven gotto pay out bout Rm3m to rental a month
the return which promised to pay off 20k memebrs (put it as RM120 instead of full Rm150 )- RM2.4million per month
so altogether steven actually gotto paid 324 million of ringgit malaysia for 5 years (excluded the fix cost, overheads, taxes, dividens, etc) if wanna add up everything i'd estimated Rm162 million for wages [30 (employees for 3 shifts of 20 hours a day to serve 50 tables there is 10 employees per shift ) X Rm900 (per employee) X 12 (months) X 5 (years) X 100 (outlets)]
fix cost is at elast 36 millions to 50 millions of ringgit malaysia. ( I estimated the lowest fix cost of Rm600 without added up the rental)
Altogether- RM324millions +RM 162 million + RM36 million= Rm522,000,000
despite maintainence fee, taxes, licenses, interest, purchase of new technology, bonus for workers( since my estimation is only Rm900 per worker to work 8 hours with 1 hour rest so incentives must be given e.g- foods and beverages)
RM60million collected from the public that is 11.5% of Rm522 million nia
_______________________________put that aside______________________________
well, silicon metioned a RM45million of revenue a month..wow that's alot. Rm45million gave steven RM540 million a years which is equlibrium of 300 mcdonald franchise steven can own a year if the mcdonald franchise can be negotiate till RM1.8 million. but with these money why not generate into someting more powerful.
QUOTE(wodenus @ Jun 30 2008, 06:53 PM)
So are you chrissolution ? and can you get their P&L statements ?
PS A handy tip for investing : "you don't make money" is always better than "you lose money". Opportunities will always be available, someone somewhere will always want your money, so for most of us, it's not like we'd die if we didn't invest. So do your due diligence, find out if they're making money, if they're a public listed company you can always get their annual reports. The way STG is trying to fund this is suspicious. Normally if you want to fund an expansion you'd take the company public, get it on the KLSE. There you can be sure everybody's interest is protected. If you can't get on there then you need to rely on private capital. The interests of the small-time investor should always be protected because as a percentage, they're investing more than the big-timers. Big-timers can afford to lose, small-timers can't.
So be mean to them, always ask for anything and everything. If they want you to invest, it's their job to tell you what you need to know. If they walk away, then well and good, you don't lose money. Better that they walk away in the beginning than in the middle. And you can
always find other places to invest.
Wow...u dam geng. The golden rule is getting nothing is better than losing something.
This post has been edited by liez: Jul 1 2008, 10:40 AM